Division of Labor - Assignment Example

This division of labor according to Durkheim is not a downfall of society; instead, it actually is a pillar that would create an orderly society.  This is what is termed as “Organic Solidarity” in his own words. This division of labor according to Durkheim is not a downfall of society; instead, it actually is a pillar that would create an orderly society.  This is what is termed as “Organic Solidarity” in his own words. "Social harmony comes essentially from the division of labor.

It is characterized by cooperation which is automatically produced through the pursuit by each individual of his own interests. It suffices that each individual consecrates himself to a special function in order, by the force of events, to make himself solidary with others."The idea of labor separation among people, in reality, helps our society to run smoothly without interrupting one another and maintains proper order. We can clearly understand this from the following hypothesis by Durkheim: “The division of labor serves to create social solidarity”.

 Solidarity is actually a fruitful relationship with one another giving rise to personal, economic and social growth according to my view. This can be understood from his own words below: “Solidarity attracts men strongly to one another, ensures frequent contacts between them, and multiples the opportunities available to enter into mutual relationships."Thus, it is clear that the division of labor is a positive one for development and to preserve social order. We all survive because of the division of labor and it can be well explained with a simple example like this, “While shoemakers and carpenters may be functioning fine if farmers stop working, everyone starves.

If the carpenters quit, no one has any shelter. If the garbage haulers don't show up, the streets become dumps and diseases spread. Durkheim saw that without one another in a highly specialized society, no one can survive. This interdependence is why the division of labor does not destroy social order”.