Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the various ethical theories - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The 2012 Penn State Scandal and Ethical Thinking and Ethical Theories Name: Institution: The 2012 Penn State scandal involved the Pennsylvania State University, which was accused of covering up the university football assistant coach’s sexual assault activities on boys…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the various ethical theories
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the various ethical theories"

Download file to see previous pages A majority of high-level university officials were charged with perjury, dismissed or suspended for covering up the activities by failing to report to the authorities. The sexual assault charges were brought onto Jerry Sandusky for sexual assaulting at least eight underage boys near or on the university property with the full knowledge of some university officials who failed to intervene or report to the appropriate authorities. The grand jury trial dropped four of the 52 charges against Jerry Sandusky who was found guilty of 45 of the 48 counts of sex assault charges, and he was sentenced to 30-60 years in prison. This paper seeks to discuss ethical thinking and ethical theories involved in the above-mentioned case. The 2012 Penn State scandal raises some very important and crucial ethical questions regarding the incident that saw top ranking university officials cover up sex assault activities of a member of staff. On their part, the members of staff who did not report Jerry Sandusky’s activities to the authorities or take pre-emptive measures to intervene illustrate negligence. It was the responsibility and it still is for every individual in society to report sex abuse crimes to the authorities. ...
Revelations that brought Jerry Sandusky’s sex abuse charges cast Joe’s ethical responsibility in a different light that negates his role as coach and protector of his charges. Many ethical issues abound regarding this case because of its multifaceted nature in terms of rationale and perspectives. It can be construed that the university’s officials failed to report on the sex abuse cases for fear of damaging the university’s reputation. On the other hand, the plight of the abused underage boys comes into sharp focus as to what was more important between the university’s reputation and their wellbeing. According to Gigerenzer, bounded rationality is an idea in decision making that stipulates the rationality behind decision making. It states that decision making in individuals is limited by the amount of information available to them with regard to the subject in question. The finite expanse of time available to them in making the decision and their cognitive limitations are also considered in this approach towards decision-making (Gigerenzer, 2010). The theory of bonded rationality terms rationality as an optimization tool that facilitates decision making in finding an optimal solution concerning the information available. Bounded rationality provides the decision makers with the option of arriving at decisions that are viable under their presenting circumstances. In essence, this means that due to limited resources like sufficient information and time, an individual is applies their rationality only after simplifying their choices (Hinman, 2011). This means that the arrival at a decision that ensures an optimal solution is not critically considered as paramount compared to the available simplified choices. In the case of the Penn State scandal, the officials ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Analyze the 2012 Penn State Scandal Using Ethical Thinking and the Essay)
“Analyze the 2012 Penn State Scandal Using Ethical Thinking and the Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the various ethical theories

Ethical Theories

...valuable actions of our society. We can override rules and laws in an attempt to save someone’s life. For example, there is a building set on fire. We need to save people inside that building though they are a murderer or criminal. In this report, I have assessed 4 theories, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Social Contract Theory. Three out of four theories have confirmed that Jean is not a criminal. It is assessed that she has performed a good job, even she used her authority in a wrong way but she still saved a life. This is perfectly according to a natural human code of law and ethics so it is concluded that Jean has performed...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Ethical Theories

... was to do something horrorific such as killing, then killing would be a universally applicable morally good thing to do. Natural Law Theory is the use of reasoning to analyze human nature and the set of universal laws which determine human behavior. Aristotle was given credit for this theory, however many after him have expounded on it, including early Stoics and religious philosophers. It postulates that moral propositions can be either true or false, and, that the core beliefs of natural law are derived from human nature and the nature of creation. That it proceeds through time, government and culture as a set of universal standards inherent in everyone, that we can know and apply to a system of just government. It provides us... is that...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Ethical Dilemma: Using Ethical Theories have his retirement soon. On the other hand, Rachel is a minority women who is in dire need of a promotion. She is hardworking and has good working experience too. In addition, throughout her service, her performance was appreciable. My friend was more than puzzled and confused. Even after prolonged discussion, there was no solution to the issue. Ignoring Bob would be considered as a wrong step. However, discriminating Rachel too seemed wrong as she possessed even better records of performance. In addition, her personal and financial situations were in dire need of improvement. Finally, my friend decided to go for Bob, though he could not justify why he ignored Rachel. Now analyzing the decision in the light of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Penn State University Scandal

...). Another concepts closely related to what has been discussed above is expectation confirmation. Jerry was a well performing coach guiding his team in bringing home many awards. From all public appearances, he looked like a good man. In expectation confirmation, we analyze the people around us and overlook their negative attribute because we already have formed a public image in our minds about them. This is very evident from the scandal. This situation can also be explained in terms of reflected appraisal process where people take time to think about how other people will think of us if we act in a certain way. This implies that the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Penn State Scandal the relatives who do not even want him to be near their children (Brumfield). The main man behind the scandal has some questionable background with the association alongside children. This has tempted him to commit a sex crime as outlined. Work cited Brumfield, Ben. Sandusky attempts to discredit witness from prison. 26 March 2013. 20 November 2013 . Frank, Fitzpatrick. “After decades of success, coach's career came to sad end.” The Philadelphia Inquirer 23 January 2012: Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC Jenkins, Sally. “PENN STATE SCANDAL -Frail Paterno tells why he backed away.” Washington post 15 January...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Ethical Theories

... is also significant in the maintenance of a balance of trade (Tone 1991). This is because if a country liberalizes its market for foreign investors, which is the case in the United States, it also needs to find market for its domestic products, which helps in increasing exports so that the imports do not exceed the exports. It would therefore not be a good decision to restrict businesses from exporting capital for production abroad. In regard to issues of exporting commodities which have been banned from sale in the United States, it is important to understand the reason behind them being banned. Kants theory of ethics focuses on observing the rights of each individual in regard to the purpose of engaging in a particular action... . If the...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Ethical Theories

...insulin pen injection product from country X to avoid financial losses and put lives of diabetes patients at stake. The second main ethical issue is whether governments of other nations (other than southern-European country) would use 25% price cut as a basis for setting drug prices and force Star Alpha to reduce the prices in all nations as well to provide relief to customers. Consequentialist (Utilitarian) Theory and Analysis It is worthwhile to point out that Utilitarian theory is actually developed by Consequential school of thought. This theory, in fact, talks the consequences / outcomes of various solutions and alternatives...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Ethical theories

..., 2010). Simply put, the theory requires that “do to others as would have them do to you.” Found in many religious doctrines it’s the best and most concise general principle of ethics. On the other hand, teleological theory is an outcome based theory. The theory states that an action is not motivated by the motive, but the end that is either good or bad (Pollock, 2010). Therefore, if an action causes a satisfactory good result, it is considered to be ethical in this theory, and the motive of such an action is considered independent of the end result. The two theories are similar in that...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

Penn State Child Abuse Scandal

.... A person engaging in any form of crime should be punished to prevent the recurrence of the crime in future. According to Chappell, failing to act on a crime in time complicates sentencing in a court of law. Additionally, a person is not always guilty of all the counts that he is accused of by the plaintiffs. This is the reason why the jury conducts investigation to ensure fairness in the delivery of justice. Work Cited Chappell, Bill. Penn State Abuse Scandal: A Guide and Timeline. NPR. 2012. Web. 17 July 2012. Task: Penn Child Abuse Scandal Summary of The Penn abuse sandal “Penn...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

Ethical thinking

...Ethical thinking Baby Theresa was born in Florida in the year 1992 with anencephaly. Her parents knew that she only had few days to live and wished to donate her organs like the liver, kidney, eyes, and heart to other needy children. However, Florida law prohibited organ transplant from live donors. At the time when baby Theresa died, her organs were in a bad state. In this context with Florida law prohibiting organ transplant from living donors, a number of professional ethicists adhered to traditional demands. The ethicists argued from different ethical theoretical viewpoints: Baby Theresa was being used as a way to meet other people’s ends; it is...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the various ethical theories for FREE!

Contact Us