The 2012 Penn State Scandal and Ethical Thinking and Ethical Theories Name: Institution: The 2012 Penn State scandal involved the Pennsylvania State University, which was accused of covering up the university football assistant coach’s sexual assault activities on boys…
Download file to see previous pages...
A majority of high-level university officials were charged with perjury, dismissed or suspended for covering up the activities by failing to report to the authorities. The sexual assault charges were brought onto Jerry Sandusky for sexual assaulting at least eight underage boys near or on the university property with the full knowledge of some university officials who failed to intervene or report to the appropriate authorities. The grand jury trial dropped four of the 52 charges against Jerry Sandusky who was found guilty of 45 of the 48 counts of sex assault charges, and he was sentenced to 30-60 years in prison. This paper seeks to discuss ethical thinking and ethical theories involved in the above-mentioned case. The 2012 Penn State scandal raises some very important and crucial ethical questions regarding the incident that saw top ranking university officials cover up sex assault activities of a member of staff. On their part, the members of staff who did not report Jerry Sandusky’s activities to the authorities or take pre-emptive measures to intervene illustrate negligence. It was the responsibility and it still is for every individual in society to report sex abuse crimes to the authorities. ...
Revelations that brought Jerry Sandusky’s sex abuse charges cast Joe’s ethical responsibility in a different light that negates his role as coach and protector of his charges. Many ethical issues abound regarding this case because of its multifaceted nature in terms of rationale and perspectives. It can be construed that the university’s officials failed to report on the sex abuse cases for fear of damaging the university’s reputation. On the other hand, the plight of the abused underage boys comes into sharp focus as to what was more important between the university’s reputation and their wellbeing. According to Gigerenzer, bounded rationality is an idea in decision making that stipulates the rationality behind decision making. It states that decision making in individuals is limited by the amount of information available to them with regard to the subject in question. The finite expanse of time available to them in making the decision and their cognitive limitations are also considered in this approach towards decision-making (Gigerenzer, 2010). The theory of bonded rationality terms rationality as an optimization tool that facilitates decision making in finding an optimal solution concerning the information available. Bounded rationality provides the decision makers with the option of arriving at decisions that are viable under their presenting circumstances. In essence, this means that due to limited resources like sufficient information and time, an individual is applies their rationality only after simplifying their choices (Hinman, 2011). This means that the arrival at a decision that ensures an optimal solution is not critically considered as paramount compared to the available simplified choices. In the case of the Penn State scandal, the officials
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1485671-analyze-the
(Analyze the 2012 Penn State Scandal Using Ethical Thinking and the Essay)
“Analyze the 2012 Penn State Scandal Using Ethical Thinking and the Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/human-resources/1485671-analyze-the.
Briefly if we explain Act Utilitarianism it necessitates that we look to non-moral outcomes of actions as simply a suitable method to put together moral decisions. In fact, act utilitarianism can spotlight on some sort of non-moral good like a suitable objective, the most leading appearance of utilitarian theory guides us to perform in an attempt to achieve the maximum contentment possible (LawAndBioEthics; Utilitarianism; Utilitarianism2).
It’s a quantitative and reductionist view of life as related to the greatest happiness for the largest number of people. It came to be associated with the liberty versus harm principle where as a person’s happiness is subject to whatever doesn’t cause harm for most people.
Though his sales records show mediocre performance, many people working under him have set sales records. In addition, he is considered as a hardworking and loyal employee, and as he is nearing retirement, many people think he deserves the promotion. Another candidate was Rachel, 37, an African-American divorcee mother of two children, who is struggling to make her both ends meet.
There are arguments that an organization has no right to interfere in personal affairs (Losey, 1993). This will be dealt with later in the arguments. However, the complaint from the female staff members on sexual harassment is a matter of concern for the organization which affects several stakeholders.
Dealing without such a system would be virtually impossible. Throughout the years crime and justice have become vital parts in today’s society; they are seen as necessary factors for the functioning of human society. Crime has become part of people’s human behaviour which brings in justice to stop the crime and protect society.
Later sections will focus on utilitarian and libertarian point of view in chosen case, its positives and negatives. These will be later compared to virtue and veil of ignorance concept. Finally, it will be outlined whether any of those theories could be applied in order to make a decision in presented scenario.
All paying attribute to attachment, commitment and involvement. In each person’s beliefs, relationships and values encourages them to desist from the wrong side of the law. The commitment to the social norms, family attachments, and institutional employments are a point to consider.
In this case there are various alternatives that the Deputy Director of Administrative Services- Manuel Thomas Lopez would have chosen among them being; remain in office and face the law, wait to get fired and/or resign as she did as a gesture for taking
Physicians are thus accorded the responsibility to advise family members on the way forward in enhancing the quality of life of the patient; either under treatment or palliative care.
Medical practitioners have an ethical duty to
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Analyze the 2012 Penn State scandal using ethical thinking and the various ethical theories for FREE!