The author, identifying visions in The Communist Manifesto, explores how Berman views modernity as merely an act of “progress,” or an art predicated on continuous transformation and exigency of modern life…
Download file to see previous pages...
This paper illustrates that through an inspiration gathered from The Communist Manifesto, Berman refers to the social and political aspects of modernity as “a unity of disunity”. Therefore, Berman tends to illustrate that modernity makes individual to be in a constant state of constant struggle and incongruity, disintegration and renewal, as well as uncertainty and anguish. Equally, this can be identified whereby Marx uses the phrase “all that is solid melts into air”, to describe the concept of modernity. As such, Berman tries to use the perpetual experiences of ‘disintegration and renewal’ to point out both the advantages and dangers associated with the modern social life. As such, not only does Berman tries to demonstrate how the structure of domination and power have taken over modernity, but he also describes the existence of prevailing political changes that are essential in the attainment of an effective modern life. Despite the fact that Berman solely relies on The Communist Manifesto as his main theoretic manuscript to illustrate modernity, there are several important inferences that his work presents that should not be overlooked. Notably important, Berman outlines an important factor for modernity by presenting an all-encompassing and dialectical understanding of the efforts and impulses by acting as ‘the developer.’ As the developer, Berman anticipates discovering both the most creative and destructive possibilities of the modern social life. Thus, for Berman, there are several factors such as demographic transformations, scientific discoveries, mass movements, and industrial upheavals among others that generate modernity. As such, Berman tends to use these socioeconomic factors, together with the changing capitalistic markets as the factors that are responsible for driving change and bringing modernity.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In such conditions all reasoning is lost and the people react in a violent way to uproot the existing system. The other name for such a type of reaction is revolution. Just because a country is ruled by a capitalist system of government, it doesn’t mean one finds perfect governance and all sections of the society are happy and live with contentment.
Identifying the way how American economic surpluses and liberties required a sacrifice rooted in labor by a large number of people who were not American at the time we should mention that this major policy document provides a holistic and systematic exposition of the basic principles of Marxism, the main core of which is the doctrine of a world, and a historic role of the proletariat as a class that is considered to be the founder of the communist society.
This acts as the motivating force behind the development of the ideas. The relationship between classes is classified as an era of the means of production. However, this relationship does not exist as it becomes incompatible with the developing forces of production.
Due to this need for labor, the capitalists then have to succumb to the demands of the working class, if only to survive. Thus, the determination of the salary of the working class rests on the way the laborers and their organizations defend their position during their negotiations with the capitalists.
This occurred, or, rather, is unraveling itself from the current era, and is on the rise by a procedure unusual to itself and thus in a way that is essential and expected, whatever may be the vicissitudes and the consecutive phases which cannot yet be
st Manifesto, Engels and Marx believed that the impact of industrialization to the world economy would be so immense that it would bring about a rapid development to different spheres of life. They argued that modern industry was the impetus behind the founding of the world