Fishing Rights Controversy - Essay Example

In many countries, cross-border conflicts have often resulted in the death of people, as well as the destruction of resources meant for use and exploitation. In addition, it fuels feelings of animosity and hatred among people that are to co-exist mutually, helping each other in times of need. The right to fishing The fish existing in the Walleye Valley are meant for economic and social use by the natives of this place.

These people are meant to be the custodians of the river and the resources in it and ensure that they exploit them for their welfare. In this case, they are mandated to use them for food, as well as important products in the market in order to improve their economic welfare. As a native Ojibwe resident, it is important to note that this valley exist when from time immemorial when our ancestors used it for their economic lives. They would fish in this river to get food for their stomachs as well as sell some to advance their economic welfare.

During this time, the ancestors did not have to get petrol authorities to use and manage these resources; they were motivated by their conscience to take good care of these reses for the welfare of future generations. The conservation and management practices used by ancestors have been passed on to the succeeding generations. This is something that should prompt the Wisconsin authorities to understand that the native canons can conserve and manage the fishing grounds and exploit them for their economic and social gains.

In this case, they should be allowed to go on with spearfishing in the valley without having to worry that the resource will be misused. Another important consideration in allowing the Ojibwe people to spearfish in their traditional way does this fishing style does not fish to deplete the fish in the river (Osawa). Traditional fishing only targets the big mature fish, giving room for the small ones to grow and mature. In this case, the native Ojibwe people will be better placed to exploit the resources in the valley, while preserving others for future generations.

The Wisconsin authorities should therefore allow the native people to go on with their fishing without having to worry that the fish they are mis permit them to allow other people to fish in the valley if only the methods they use will lead to conservation and management of the fishing grounds and not just the misuse and overexploitation of such resources (Osawa). The natives, the Ojibwe people should determine the right management and conservation systems for the fish in the valley, by advocating spear fishing.2. Conclusion Resources are essential elements that enhance the quality of human life, in their social, economic, and other dimensions.

In this case, people are expected to use resources in the most effective ways, taking measures to conserve and manage them for future generations. One of the best ways to conserve and manage natural resources is the use of the bicultural approach; in this method, the natives of the regions deemed to have the resources are allowed to use the resources while creating systems of proper management and conservation. In this case, the Ojibwe people should be given the right to use their spearfishing methods to fish in the valley, while taking care of the fishing resources to avoid overuse and exploitation for future generations.

Wisconsin authorities should teach the native Ojibwe people the best ways of controlling the fishing practices in the valley, including using spearfishing methods, which do not lead to overfishing or poisoning the fish. By doing so, the natives will have a good chance to enjoy the fishing resources that have existed in this place since time immemorial and were passed on to them by their ancestors.