StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Coercive Power in the Middle East - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Coercive Power in the Middle East" focuses on the way countries in the Middle East have tried to maintain control over political discourse, how they tried to promote economic development and the way they continue to respond to the popular opposition and demand for change…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.3% of users find it useful
Coercive Power in the Middle East
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Coercive Power in the Middle East"

History Coercive Power in the Middle East Leadership style is the Middle East is an issue that has drawn a lot of attentionfrom all over the world. Middle East is one of the regions in the world that have had a history of authoritarian leadership for a long time. Most Middle East leaders have dominated over the public by designing a coercive apparatus that suppresses the voice of the public and oppose any internal dissent. However, it is clear that this is altogether a challenge and many countries have come to develop some semblance for legitimacy in the form of a ruling bargain to win the popular populations. At a time of political democracy, Middle East has stood out as the most resistive to reforms and the government has yet to develop democracy to support economic development. This essay focuses on the way countries in Middle East have tried to maintain control over political discourse, how they tried to promote economic development and the way they continue to respond to the popular opposition and demand for change. In addition, it will focus on how countries have been successful in maintaining a ruling bargain. Middle East is one of the regions that have developed robust coercive apparatus to dominate in power. Kamrava (272-273) stated, “regardless of the robustness of its effective coercive apparatus, no state can rule through sheer repression alone, and it must carve out some semblance for legitimacy, not matter how narrow and contrived, with some sectors of the population. In the Middle East, this effort crystallized in the form of state-imposed ruling bargain” Kamrava seems to refer to well-shaped coercive apparatus that many Middle East countries have used to suppress the rights of the people. In authoritarian government, the people submits their rights to a central government, which uses these absolute powers to remain in control while pursuing economic development. The authoritarian government remains in power by opposing political discourse and fighting against reformists. The purpose of such government is to remain in power without necessarily meeting the demands of the nation. In countries such as Iran, the president has always developed mechanisms against any internal dissent. For instance, the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has used his political power to win election against the will of the people. His re-election in 2009 was a political manipulation, in spite of the internal dissent raised by the public against his election. This shows the effects of coercive power that authoritarian government uses to suppress the will of the people. Although Middle East countries have shown efforts to develop the country’s economy, it is clear that they have been inefficient due to misdirected priorities. Since the government gives priority to the welfare of the leaders and those close to leadership, they fail to focus on the shaping on the nation (Kamrava 213). Economists have criticized heavy economic spending of most Middle East countries on issues such as security and developing international networks that support their leadership. For instance, in Egypt, the government has spent a lot of money on security leading to bankruptcy of its economy. Egypt spends over $2 billion on security, of which the money is the foreign aid that the government gets for United States. Iran spends over 30 billion that it earns from its government from oil sales to cover for its security framework. Therefore, while such countries have the potential to develop economically, their focus on maintaining the robust coercive apparatus while ignoring social needs such as health. On this note, it has become a great challenge for these countries to develop economically. Successful countries such as Qatar have shifted to democratic governance that puts the needs of the people as a priority. Most states in the Middle East have suppressed any opposition to governance and change in the political structure. Most of the Middle East rulers have not received public election but have maintained power for many years. In Iran, the government has always been resistant to change the constitution, especially the section defining the responsibilities of government and the rights of the people. Consequently, bad leaders have remained within leadership to manipulate the will of the people and to suppress any political activism. Ahmadinejad has remained in power since the year 1979 and has been opposed to activists who have come to define new political structures. He was particularly opposed to the public’s assertion to limit the number of the years that a president should rule a country. In addition, the government in Middle East opposes change by imposing strict laws featuring loyalty and terming those who speak ill of the government as unloyal. This kind of governance underpins the underdevelopment of most Middle East countries (Kamrava 148). Countries such as Such as Iraq that have large oil wells are still within the bracket of developing countries. On this note, the resistance to change in the Middle East countries has resulted to slow growth and development. ‘Ruling Bargain’ is a strategy that most Middle East countries have used to show legitimacy to specific populations within their countries. A ruling bargain is one of the examples of forms of legitimacy that authoritarian government uses to formulate stable governments. In a ruling bargain, the governing body and the people come into an agreement on how to form a stable political structure. As Kamrava (172), it is impossible for any government to rule by mere repression, as they must have some form of legitimacy no matter how narrow this may be. This is the reason why the autocratic governments of the Middle East are being compelled to revise their charters and review the collective ruling bargain. For instance, Kuwait has been forced to revise its charter due to public pressure. Although this does not result to an ideal ruling bargain, it is clear that part of the citizen population benefit from these changes. In Egypt, there has been great public unrest ending in coup due to the government inability to satisfy the ruling bargain. The failure of the government in these countries to establish an efficient bargain is linked to the abuse of leadership power. While the public expects to obtain economic and social benefits after surrendering their power to the government, it is clear that government has failed to satisfy the demands of this bond. As a result, the people have lost their confidence with government and this is the reason why the instances of public unrest and government criticism have become more common in the country. Kamrava (214) conceptualizes the ruling bargain as the struggle that has ensued between the advocates of democracy and the autocratic elites. There has been a fierce war between those who for a long time stood for democracy and the autocratic leaders. In countries such as Iran, there have been domestic struggles as the government fails to achieve their democratic autocrats, which Kamrava feels are not democratic substance. The leaders abuse the ruling bargain by promising liberalization while they remain static to the changes in political spheres. However, there stands hopes for a fair ruling bargain as democratic institutions such as the parliament and the election bodies emerged to control the politics in the Middle East countries. Notably, changes are inevitable in these countries as the democrats pursue a liberal government in an effort to establish a favourable ruling bargain. In conclusion, the Middle East is one of the regions in the world that maintains autocratic leadership and whose leaders have resisted change. The rulers hold powers in their hands and use a lot of economic worth of the country to protect it and to enrich themselves, while ignoring the public interests. The government suppresses the public activism and uses its power to dominate in the social politics. It is evident that the re-election of the leaders in most Middle East countries has been irregular. The result of autocratic leadership is that the economies of these countries are constrained and there is a long way to go if they have to achieve development. The government uses its political mechanisms to oppose democratization or any activist against the government structure. However, as Kamrava points out, it is impossible to rule by mere repression and this is the reason why there has been a wave of change in these countries. Political unrests have pushed many Middle East countries to form a review their ruling bargains to satisfy the needs of the people. On this note, it is recommendable that the Middle East countries change their political structure to pave way for new approaches to political and economic development. Works Cited Kamrava, Mehran. The Modern Middle East: A Political History Since the First World War. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. Internet resource. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Coercive Power in the Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Coercive Power in the Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1645944-coercive-power-in-the-middle-east
(Coercive Power in the Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Coercive Power in the Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1645944-coercive-power-in-the-middle-east.
“Coercive Power in the Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1645944-coercive-power-in-the-middle-east.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Coercive Power in the Middle East

Power, Authority, and Force as Aspects of the Life of Individual

power, Authority and Force are Distinct A teacher enters a classroom full of young minds; some eager to learn, and others waiting for recess or even the time to go back home.... At the same time, the teacher wields power, however he cannot force a child to do his homework or run some errands if the child does not want to - thus, the distinction between power, authority and force.... power, authority and force are three different aspects of an individual's or society's life....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Democratization among Challenges

For example in middle east, what hinders democracy is the strong authoritarianism systematically helped by the military (Bellin, 2004).... The powerful military has the illegitimate will to resist democratic transition in middle east.... It results in providing humans with the due share in the towers of power and authority.... Because of the principle of human equity which democracy establishes, there has always been strong opposition by the coercive apparatus of the states....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

American Foreign Policy

government has been criticized on many occasions for meddling with the middle east, yet, it does so little to solve underlying problems.... government used raw power in an effort to crush the outlawed group.... hellip; These forms of power are known as hard and soft power respectively.... Hard power is a concept that illustrates use of coercive and aggressive means to influence interests and behaviors of other countries....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

How involved should the U.S. be

Involvement in the middle east America's involvement in the middle east has long been rooted in the history of American foreign policy.... hellip; With the present situation occurring in the middle east, the U.... Meanwhile, the isolationist policy promotes the cessation of US involvement in the middle east, which is to some extent, an advantage for the U.... government may adopt different approaches in its policy stance toward the middle east, this paper seeks to focus on the policy of realpolitik as its general stance vis-a-vis with its political affairs and involvement in the region....
3 Pages (750 words) Coursework

Script for Talk Show: Talking Points

First of all, I would like to ask the two of you: what are your concepts of imperialism Hassad: Well, imperialism is one dominant state exercising power over a weaker state, with no other motive but to forward its own agenda and make the weaker state subservient.... Host: Good afternoon, everyone....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

How communication flows, Organizational diversity and Conflict management

The first communication… It ensures that the instructions are easily made comprehensible for all and sundry who are within the middle and lower cadres and The second form could be the one that starts from the lower or middle management and goes up towards the top management....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Multilateralism and the International Organizations

hellip; The main proponents of multilateralism have traditionally been the middle powers such as Canada, Australia and the Nordic countries.... Larger states often act unilaterally, while the smaller ones may have little direct power at all in international affairs aside from participation in the United Nations (by consolidating their U.... Conferences such as the Conference of Berlin in 1884 helped reduce great power conflicts during this period, and the nineteenth century was one of the Europes most peaceful....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

To What Extent Has the USA Been Successful In Creating a Durable Liberal World Order

America has had war all over middle east and has changed their ruler and also intimidated people to fight for their lives.... This paper talks that United State is the super power nation and on an international level it has a position which no other country has.... America is a great power and has an authoritative power.... They decide the trade of oil and have technological power over other nations.... America has the interest of being the super power of the world and they had done many atrocities and tactics to remain on top....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us