Download file to see previous pages...
The concept of “Third World” was applied as an expression similar to that of the “Third Force,” which described and referred to the Non-aligned Asian and African nations’ groups psychologically unified in common resistance to colonialism and imperialism. The Nonaligned Asian and African nations’ groups inevitably occupied a political gap amid the capitalists (First World) and the socialists (Second World). Through this non-alignment, the group of nations tried to maintain their independence and distance themselves from the two rival superpowers, purposely to benefit from the rivalry. In addition, the “Third World” materialized as an element of the three world’s categorization scheme that, while it maintained currency, appeared to be compelling since it served a double fraction, known as “the globe’s hegemonic conceptualization, and of fight against that domination” (Ninkovich 23). Moreover, immediately after the formulation of the phrase “Third World”, the word was actively approved by radical liberation advocates from Euro-American hegemony and colonialism who supposed it as both an amassing notion to achieve the decolonization missions, and as a mechanism through which to adjust global relationships.
An evident fact is that most of the violent and dangerous Cold War moments were often in the “Third World” region. Both USA and USSR were ready to apply force where they would do without undesirable war risk with their rival superpower. At that time, Europe was amazingly stable; therefore, crises only arose in regions where no equally shared agreement on the region’s status in the superpower confrontation context existed. “Third World” nations like Cuba in the early 1960s, Afghanistan in 1979, Vietnam in the 1960s and Korea in 1950 are major instances (Ninkovich 31). In three of these situations, USA and USSR fought hot battles by proxy. Both USA and USSR considered
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Many pundits believe that globalization is a relatively new phenomenon but if we travel down to the history of humankind, we can see that globalization already happened to some extent even in the olden
changing time of political and economic experiences in America, the American population had to deal with direct control of important socioeconomic decision making processes for the general public by the government. The principle of Laissez-Faire emerged in the 17th century with
between big business, government, and American working class during the late 19th and early 20th century was one where the government and businesses worked together in exploiting the American working class, through programs, policies, and activities that concentrated wealth and
The paper explores the use of similar communications and relationship building strategies in cricket; a game that suffers from an image problem. One of the objectives of the paper is to find out the reasons why
Low pay jobs and low status jobs were left for the African American among other minority groups because the immigrants were typically unskilled, illiterate and very poor (Viault 67). White Americans could
The shift brought about ‘disturbing’ changes among the middle-class society. Large corporations represented greed and materialism, while part bosses took advantage of the desperation and political ignorance of
This attitude fueled the displacement of Native Americans from their ancestral lands and escalated tension between Mexico and the US, which led to a war that resulted in many fatalities and destruction of property.
The American exceptionalism theory alludes to the uniqueness of
1 Pages(250 words)Admission/Application Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Admission/Application Essay on topic US FOREIGN RELATIONS SINCE 1900: A GLOBAL HISTORY for FREE!