Nobody downloaded yet

U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
A filibuster in the great United State Senate, basically refers to an obstruction or dilatory measures used to prevent or block certain assess from being voted for (Abegg, 2013, p. 219). The common type of a filibuster comes after a certain senator tries to delay or completely…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today"

Download file to see previous pages In the United States, the senate voted for the change of rules that enabled the republican to prevent the president Barack Obama nominees for the top administrative posts (Abegg, 2013 p. 219).
The senators approved the partisan measures that were to ban the filibuster so as to prevent the nominated personnel from being confirmed (Ford, 2013, p. 214). Harry Reid in his speech about supporting the measure, he accused the Republicans of preventing the nominees in the pursuit of unrelated legislative expectations or goal. Reid argued that the republicans used the filibuster laws weapon for preventing president Obama from choosing and appointing an executive representative and also, appointing the judges. The blocking of the filibuster law does seem constitutionally because, on the other hand, the filibuster acted as the weapon barrier to prevent the president from passing many bills, but they had a right to their opinion (Steffen, p. 202). After the law was blocked, the senator’s power was deducted from the senate to the president. The president was enacted with so much power than before the bill was changed in 2013. This law was mostly used by the republicans more than three times in November to block president Obama from confirming votes on the judges nominated to fill the vacancies on the United States for the Washington DC (The Guardian). Reid also argued that the Republicans objected the bills not because they do not have the qualifications, but just because they wanted just to undermine the government, they were elected to work for (Kenneth, 2013, p. 129).
Senator Dan Coates reacted by saying he change of the rule was an idea of weakening the founding fathers of the democracy, and he said it was yet another power grabbing from the republicans. Senator Kelly Ayotte reacted to the rule by saying that the grab of the power is so much disappointing to all the republicans in the United State government, she said ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today Research Paper”, n.d.)
U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today Research Paper. Retrieved from
(U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today Research Paper)
U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today Research Paper.
“U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic U.S. Constitution In 1787 and Today for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us