Date: Constitution Some Americans today claim that our Constitution should not be "interpreted"; instead, it should be applied according to the founders' original intent. In fact, one of our Supreme Court justices, Antonin Scalia, has stated that he is a textualist; an originalist…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The criticisms arise from not only the common law people like lawyers but even judges who are the custodians of the laws in the constitution. There are mainly three groups of people where the constitution is involved. The first group subscribes to the theory that the constitution should be based on original intent, the others insist that it should be based on textualism and the rest insist that the constitution is a living document and hence subject to changes and other amendments (Isaacs 5). Textualists hold the belief that the constitution should not be based on intent where judges and others using the constitution make their own interpretations of it. Instead, they should use it according to the way the original drafters of the constitution wrote it. The same views are held by those subscribing to the originalism theory who insist that the original meaning of the constitution should be maintained and if any amendments are to be made whatsoever, they should be in line with the original ideas of those who drafted it and diverse further. These two groups of people go parallel with those arguing that the constitution is a living document which should be dynamic and hence flexible to have as many amendments as necessarily required. This last group therefore insists that the constitution should be interpreted according to the situation at hand and in accordance to other laws and also in order for the rest of the citizens who are not legal technocrats to understand it better. These differing ideologies about the constitution were also experienced initially when it was being drafted as not all those congressmen present voted in support of it in the constitutional convention of 1787. The differences were also experienced later on in the late 1700s and early 1800s hence the various amendments that were made among them being the 1st to the 12th amendment all which were made during this period. The founding fathers of the constitution therefore disagreed and finally made changes and hence were not supporters of textualism. Textualism is a good thing since it helps to ensure that the original meaning of the constitution is maintained. However the original intent of the constitution should be present because times are changing and since even the original drafters of the constitution made changes to the document, then there is no need of fully committing to textualism. Based on the above facts and even the evidence that has been seen through the twenty seven (27) amendments made since it was drafted, my views are that the constitution is and remains to be a living document and hence will keep on allowing for amendments to be made but at the same time ensure that the original ideas and meaning is not lost during the changes and interpretation. We fought a revolution for "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" because "all men are created equal." Yet the United States remained a slave nation for over 80 years after this revolution even though some founders disapproved and some states abolished the institution. So was this great country of ours founded on hypocrisy? The founders of this nation had the best interest of the rest of the US citizens at heart. It is this love and passion for their country that made them draft the constitution which was not only a declaration of law but also the way forward for the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Nothing such happened that could bring about positive change in the lives of Canadian women; feminists’ expectations that a new period of economic freedom would herald with the development gained through speedier sophistication in work environment failed in materializing.
In essence, advertisements are driven by different goals and objectives; some to improve purchase of products or services, others for wide viewership like in the case of TV stations, or for convincing consumers of an organization’s superiority within a field of production and so on.
The Alien and Sedition Acts were signed into law by President John Adams in 1798. The Alien Act was approved July 6, 1798. The Alien Act which was an Act Respecting Alien Enemies had three sections while the Sedition Act also known as An Act in Addition to the Act, Entitled "An Act for the Punishment of Certain Crimes against the United States had four sections.
nd other American colonies have heavily influenced him and he began writing pamphlets and circulating them among fellow Americans, hoping to free the colonies from the grip of British royal tyranny.
Paine’s major arguments centre around the fallibility of the concept of the
It is also the period that has seen America grow rapidly in terms of economic growth and become the worlds dominant economic, industrial and agricultural power (Capozzoli, 45). This period is also called the period of
The author states that several factors led to European exploration and overseas expansion in this period. Firstly, the Europeans had desire for wealth and power. At the onset of exploration, many of these countries were weak economically. Those in authority felt there were vast opportunities for wealth generation in the New World.
The essay tries to hide the truth about the US during the war with their counterparts. The images are of great concern since they show a negative attitude towards what happened during the war of the Americans and the Vietnam country at
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
with a personal 20% discount.