Analyzing Monarchy in the Middle East - Essay Example

Rulers have their ways of leadership procedures. Istibdad advocates for working along the ruler's way in a monarchy. Religious constitutions are important to these leaders because they act as their guide. They view themselves as leaders chosen by God.

Monarchy could relate its way of leadership to the supreme authority. The leadership is hereditary and remains within the family. Family members are the top organ of the country. These two types of monarchy still exist but differ in their structure. The Arabs drew a common definition to balance these Monarchies. A situation like this could use the word ‘Malik’ to balance. People say; the king and Malik are both equal and are both important (Gause 96).

Arabs have evidence of their royal titles. A person could trace the background of the title by studying the evidence, for example, studying the coins (Gause, 95). In ancient Arab, people did not like the Kings. Arabs did not want any form of the central government. Lilah is the word used to describe people who abide by every rule of the king.

Islam draws their hate of kings from the bible. They give the example of the monarchy of Israel, in the book of Hebrews. The case is not the same for all Kings. The Quran depicts David and Solomon as good kings. The only difference in determining which kingdom is good is when one contrasts kingdoms with caliph and caliphate (Gause, 79).

Malik depicted military leaders. Their authority was secular, where religion had no place (Gause, 90). The rule had no laws from the ruler, but rather the use of personal thoughts. King, as a title, was improved in terms of imperialism. After improvements, the name king improves and becomes sultan or Persian. Pedicabs self-declare themselves as emperors. They make their rights and rules. Examples of padishans are the sultan of Turkey and the Shah of Persia. They consider them great (Gause, 95).

Kings were coordinators of the Padishans. The title of the king became so small and less influential in Muslim countries. Foreign leaders in the country were kings. Harun al-Rashid was a caliph who emperor Nicephorus addressed as king of Arabs (Gause, 87). This was an insult because it depicted him as only the king of the Arab world only.

Titles define territories. An example is Malik king of two lands and two seas. It showed the areas the king rules. The Islamic world did not have titles defining territories. It was only in Europe. The Muslims learned about it in the 20th century (Gause, 99).

The Mohamed Ali dynasty ruled Egypt and Sudan. The rulers of this dynasty used the title of Khedive. With this, the kingdom adopted the name the Khedival dynasty. People attribute the modernization of Egypt to these Khedives. The change of their name to Khedive was due to their wish of autonomists against Ottoman pushers. It was like a declaration of independence. This order became trending, and many dynasties followed the trend. They did this to declare independence from European powers (Gause, 100).