Discrepancies between the Poor and the Rich - Essay Example

The majority who were the poor people showed displeasure through numerous sporadic uprisings though the then regime despite its failings contended to have put more effort towards meant to improve the economy. The poor felt they were only working hard and long hours without anything to show for their efforts but acting as mechanisms intended to cushion the lives of the elite the majority were in the government and resided in posh regions. This is evident in the quote, which was a sentiment raised by a young labourer claiming despite how hard they toiled to make their lives better and bearable, employers were the sole determiners of their fate. Since they mercilessly used policies to compel them in operating machines in their factories for long hours while in return offering extremely low wages that could not sustain them well where they lived. Based on this scenario, I tend to think most of them lost their jobs at a very high rate because employers had a big selection of choosing what they want and wished to pay in terms of labour.

I wanted also to show the then lack of workers’ authority to influence the determination of their salaries and wages. Employers especially the then manufacturing moguls enjoyed big margins due to cheap and easily available labour by willing people working long hours to earn more. This is to cater for numerous and even costly medical costs in their shanty residential areas. Therefore, employers, in this case, used meagre earnings as a hook to retain poor labourers in their industries because they had no other options for earning the money they desperately needed for their daily sustenance.

However, workers despite being exploited by these moguls dared to voice their grievances. This is evident in the young man’s sentiments who without fear stood out to protest what he deemed was the then moguls’ state of exploiting poor laborers. Keen analysis of this sentiment brings out much-untold exploitation despite being a short quote. For instance, the young lad contends of “oppressed on every hand” thus summarizing utter oppression and neglect even in the congested regions where they resided with their families.

In this article, “We find ourselves oppressed on every hand-we labour hard in producing all the comforts of life for the enjoyment of others” based on my opinion is the only line that bears core information regarding the main grievance aired by the speaker, which is exploitation. Without other remaining lines or sentences, the first section adequately gives the gist of the speaker’s argument, which is due to its structure and further description part denoted by the use of a hyphen. Since, the rest only act as extension lines meant to expound the first section.

By keen evaluation of these sentences, I do not think there are any meaningless parts to the extent of challenging its implication or further expounding the main theme of exploitation.