Waltzs Systematic Theory - Case Study Example

Consequently, Waltz’s systemic theory is only generating partial explanations. This Waltz’s systematic theory indicates how behaviour is affected by the structure. However, it does not indicate how other variables interact with the structure to produce exact behavioural outcomes. This paper, therefore, draws on the theoretical writing of Waltz and his theory of applications to empirical subjects (the role of NATO after the Cold War, superpower relations that occurred during the war and soviet socialization in the international society), and on the theoretical literature. The paper explores the tension implications in the approach that Waltz took for his theory of explanatory in international relations. This is an indication that the earlier theories by Waltz offer no substantive argument and therefore a misunderstanding between the realists and the conservatives in attempting to offer a casual generalization in a complex system (Waltz 78-9).

According to Waltz’s theory, international relations in a complex system or structure are not adequately addressed using explanatory theory since there is no mutual agreement that is consistent with all parties. Out of all realism theories advanced to explain international relations and conflicts, Waltz’s neorealism approach to international relations is generally accepted by many scholars as an intellectual hegemony because this theory is the most influential and uncontroversial. Ruggie and Brown react to this Waltz’s theory by saying that it 'is, justly, the most influential book on International Relations theory of its generation' and they allude that international relations are founded on the realism theory as described by Waltz. According to Keohane, the effectiveness of realism theory as proposed by Waltz lies in the power of the international community to be autonomous and remain active if there exist any causal autonomous force. This theory further asserts that as opposed to inductive international theory on politics, a systematic political realism, as the case of Waltz is defined by independence. He argues the value of Waltz’s theory on international relationships: 'lies less in his initiation of a new line of theoretical inquiry or speculation than in his attempt to systematize political realism into a rigorous, deductive theory of international politics (Waltz 34-5).

Germany is bestowed with the richest account on Jewish antecedent among European countries. The Jews are said to have arrived in Germany as early as the fifth century and influenced German tradition to a great extent especially in trade and commerce. Their status would however take a turn on the onset of the enlightened absolutist’s ideology of statehood and the supremacy of states. This led to the identification and segregation of the Jewish community with some rejecting them while others embraced their value to their society. This led to the capitalist approach to the Jews which ensured that their lifestyles were highly regulated to ensure that their stay was on a value basis (De Lange 71). This saw them rise to a sizable professional class that controlled and thrived in the urban population. It stimulated the anti-Semitic movement that found its way into politics. The equal rights for the Jews in Germany went unquestioned up until the rise of Adolph Hitler in 1933. He brought to the surface the ensuing discrimination of the Jews and pushed it further to legal discrimination and violence.

From then on the Jewish lifestyle was torn between assimilation and nationalization. The assimilation ideology bears its origins in the early 19th century as an eschatological message. The idea was a result of the desire for emancipation alongside the will for religious revolution as well as fervour for re-evaluation of the political paradigm. The conflict and coexistence between the nationalist society and the romanticist movement allowed the Jews to reside among the Germans and assimilate. Unlike the previous administrations that had opted to either assimilate or nationalize the Jews, Hitler enacted laws that officially denounced Judaism as a race and terminated the citizenship of all the Jews including those who had been nationalized.

This led to the unification and agitation of the German Jewry who came together to promote immigration and provision of basic services to those that had been deprived of them subject to the new laws and policies. The implementation of the final solution in 1941 was considered as the epitome of German policy on the eradication of the Jews where they were forced to wear a yellow star for identification and transfer slums and reserves. These were used as corners for forced labour and murder through gas chambers. It culminated from a series of other racist laws such as the law for the restoration of the professional civil service that was enacted to deny the sticking Jewish professionals from being employed in the government. Other policies would later be formulated to restrict the Jews from joining the army. Subsequently, the enactment of the policy saw the majority of the Jewish population move from Germany up until the fall and end of the Nazi reign. The German Jewry thereafter consists of those who fled Germany and returned after the end of the Nazi government, those who stayed and were not discovered and those who took refuge in Germany after the war (De Lange 45).