Download file to see previous pages...
Another similarity that emerged out of the writings of these four authors is their consideration paid to the importance of early biblical scripts. It has been found that both humanists and reformists used earlier Greek and Latin bibles as a source of understating the early doctrines of Jesus Christ and attempted to promulgate the teachings of earlier scripts along with special attention paid to removal of unjust acts and corrupt people from higher clergy of Christianity. Another striking similarity is their attempt of investigating the core meanings of earlier biblical scripts and their reference to the practices of 16th century instead of simply bringing a reform by questioning church’s authority. Other attributes such as references to practices of early church, criticism on scholastic theological approach and problems in church i.e. simony, pluralism, favoritism and illiteracy in clergymen, also show further similarities (“The Reformations” 4). Reformism has been considered as an ultimate outcome of humanism due these resemblances (Patrick n.d).
Where humanists like Erasmus and More are accused of laying down the foundation of Protestantism, both sects are often found criticizing each other due to some major differences. Erasmus’s and More’s writings have been found more convincing for the elite class with an understanding of Latin. On the other hand, reformists like Luther and Calvin addressed the concerns of every social class when it came to church and its way of functioning as a nucleus of society i.e. authority of religion and society’s civil law. Humanists also showed their adherence to the higher offices of church and did not question the authority of pope as the leader of the church and its proceedings whereas reformers considered only faith as a source of acquiring salvation by following bible. In extension to that,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
A closer look into reformation reveals that national identity is something constructed rather than natural. Nationality was created as particular types of social and cultural interactions encouraged people to imagine a national community where previously there had been only unrelated groups or individuals.
Why did Progressive reformers believe it essential to curb the power of American capitalism? Were they right? The rise of Progressive Reformers during the onset of 20Th century as the state was preparing itself for WW1 significantly brought changes in American’s economical, political and social sectors.
The Renaissance or the period of rebirth was a cultural movement that covered roughly during the 14th to the 17th century starting in Italy and spread to the rest of Europe. This period of more than two centuries was marked by a revival of interest in the art of ancient classic.
The period of "Renaissance" began in Italy and then spread to Europe by the 16th century. "Renaissance" characteristics, such as individualism, love of nature, and secularism or the concentration of human interest upon the affairs of this world, are to be found in broad reaches of the Middle Ages.
Temperance, religion, class, and agriculture also became issues of fairness as the citizenry attempted to forge a new country with a myriad of ideas and attitudes. One may view these differing opinions as to leading to a civil war and an uncertain future of further oppression.
Indeed, what began as a religious struggle, soon after generated considerable influence in society and politics. The Reformation, instituted by the brilliant theologians of their day such as Luther, Calvin and Zwingli, bore hints of revolutionary ideals which called for transformations not only within the church but also within political and social bounds.
The work of one specific reformer, Sojourner Truth, will be discussed in depth.
It is important to recognize that many of the social reformers were strongly against the idea of the political machine, which might best be