Download file to see previous pages...
Finally, the paper will take a neutral stance based on their arguments.
Arguably, there is noticeable indifference in Martin’s way of leadership especially in cases where he talked about Civil Rights. In his quest for Equal rights to all people, Martin deliberated for a non-violent protest, passive resistance, and use of what he termed as the “Weapons of love”. With reference to these protesting means, it is seeable that Martin’s fight for Civil Rights involved simple and friendly methods. On the other end, Malcolm X was a great leader, but unfortunately, his means of fighting for Civil Rights were rather outrageous than those of Martin Luther King. At some point, analysts point out that Malcolm X was suspicious of the whites and was ready to apply “any methods necessary” in order to achieve equality (Keith and Anissa 48). Additionally, the debate between these two great leaders is very substantial as it gives the best understanding of weapons used by leaders during activism. The video of King and Malcolm shows that, as long as he strove to achieve what he felt best for his people, Malcolm was a segregationist up until his renowned pilgrimage to Mecca since he was a Muslim.
In the video, Martin’s reasoning was rather rationale unlike that of X whose arguments depicted uncertainty in various occasions. For instance, before his highly spoken departure to Mecca, X’s attitude towards racial discrimination against blacks depicted rather uneven correspondence with that Martin. As such, his Black Muslim brothers, under the royalty of Elijah Mohammed, revolted and started viewing X as a threat to the Black Muslim Movement. Specifically, the debate between Martin and X shown profound disagreements with regard to the arguments, reasoning and quotes brought about by both leaders. In the case of Martin, struggle for
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In my opinion, the Andrea Yates case and some other cases prove how justice and law provisions can be interpreted in favor of whomever necessary. For me, a simple observer, it is obvious that, in spite of her mental disorders, Yates knew what she was doing and she planned it carefully, waiting for the right moment to occur.
Malcolm X was born in 1925 as Malcolm Little, a farmer in the rural region of Michigan and the founder of Universal Negro Improvement Association. One of his early memories comprise of waking up in the midst of fire in his house. (Lewin) He had a very troubled childhood and young adulthood.
and Malcolm X. Both fought very hard for what they symbolize but in distinct ways. Their most beliefs may have bloomed from the houses they came from and grew up. King Jr. was well educated and matured in a middle class family. On the other side, Malcolm X grew up in an underclass environment that was very unfavorable with hardly any schooling.
Despite the fact they both lived and operated during the same period of history they hardly ever worked together; nevertheless, they both played a pivotal role eliminating racism and promoting equality across the racial divide. It is largely because of their efforts that Americas can vote for a black president who only 50 years ago would not have been allowed a seat on a bus.
On the surface, there seem some commonalities between the two titans of the civil rights era: to start with, the most striking similarity, of course, is that both believed in Black liberation. Secondly, apart from being contemporaries, they both lived an exactly identical lifespan –39 years.
Yet, while a number of politicians and economists sharply changed their outlook after such major events, Keynes thoroughly analyzed the new experience.
In his monumental work The Economic Consequences of the Peace Keynes critically analyzed the effects of Versailles Pease and particularly the effects of the Treaty on Germany.
It has often been written that while Malcolm X was impatient and stressed a sense of urgency in the civil rights fight, King took a more deliberate attitude and argued that equality would be a slow and difficult road. King's legacy has been portrayed by a belief in a future of racial equality while Malcolm X has been characterized as insisting that white America could not offer equality and demanded black separatism.
and manages to write “A homemade education.” The article focuses on Malcolm X and Martin Luther King because they represent two different approaches to attaining a common goal. Their different approaches of violence and nonviolence seem to stem from their initial opinions
For example, the march on Washington and the Montgomery bus boycott was his most influential. Conversely, Malcolm X had a different background, thus, used different methods to fight against racism. Malcolm X
The author presents King’s and X’s relationship with the civil rights movement beyond the usual simple dualism.
One of the main points of the introduction is that the popular idea that the two men were
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Martin Luther King vs. Malcom X Debate for FREE!