Critique of Aristotle's Politics - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The paper will examine the applicability of his ideas in the world today. It will analyze the ethics of Aristotle against the way today’s governance. This paper will offer an informed critique…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Critique of Aristotles Politics
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Critique of Aristotle's Politics"

Download file to see previous pages In each of these types of governance, he gives the sound and the bad. According to Aristotle, the philosopher king is the ideal governance. In this form, the kings’ interest is in the welfare of his people (Tacitus & Benario 18).
The highest form of governance is the monarchy. It is hereditary in nature, and people can associate freely with the royal family. In a monarchy, the interests of the nation take priority above all other matters. When the respectable leadership of a monarchy becomes rogue, Aristotle terms it as tyranny. When leadership becomes self seeking the citizens of this state, suffers thus; cannot achieve happiness (Chuska 277).
Aristotle considers aristocracy of philosophers to be the second best leadership. When this form of leadership gets crooked, it becomes oligarchy. Further, he views democracy as the worst form of leadership. In his opinion, the third best form of leadership is one whose polity would combine all the noble forms of leadership. According to Aristotle, a polity is a constitution. Aristotle is of the opinion that, for a polity to be viable, it has to consider the stability and security of its people.
The aristocracy as Aristotle puts it is the rule of several. When a virtuous rule of law prevails the society enjoys solidity. In this rule, the needs of the wealthy get priority while the rest of the population gets neglected. This brings about class division, and discrimination on the basis of riches. The elite in the society protect and guard their status making it difficult to join the elite group from low class people. According to Aristotle, who was advocating for fairness, elitism in the society is wrong (Chuska 278).
Polity is the rule of the majority. This is what Aristotle refers to as the rule of many. In the better form, it concerns with the needy. The leaders take office through an election. It is the citizens of the state who decide the person ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Critique of Aristotle's Politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1605650-critique-of-aristotles-politics
(Critique of Aristotle'S Politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1)
https://studentshare.org/history/1605650-critique-of-aristotles-politics.
“Critique of Aristotle'S Politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1605650-critique-of-aristotles-politics.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Aristotle
...are Magna Moralia and the Eudemian ethics. Of all of the above, Necomachean ethics is considered as one of the most popular and widely applied in different and almost all situations (Tannsjo, 97). This works is thought to have impacted a lot on the people of Europe of the middle ages since it became the core of philosophy by that time. It is also considered to one of the Aristotle’s ethical works that was very critical with reference to the development of both the European theology and law as well as all modern philosophy. Others have also argued that some of the Aristotelian traditional ethical ideas became very important in practical political thinking. One of the major principles that...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
Critique of Aristotle's Politics
...? [Module] Aristotle’s Politics Introduction The notion of government is a prominent consideration in the Greek and Roman philosophy. In the development of his work, Aristotle makes a comparison of different government structures by introducing criteria. These include the number of rulers such as one, few or many as well as the nature of the political regime, namely, good or corrupt. As a result, six different types of empires were developed – including monarchy, aristocracy and polis – that are considered good types of government. Other types include tyranny, oligarchy and democracy, which are considered bad ones. It has been argued that there are a number of advantages...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Politics 1920's
...The advancement and development of government operations during the WW1 reversed in 1920 political era.The attempts of the government to end trusts and control business operations resulted to a new focus on unity between business and government. During this period, Harry Daugherty speculated about the Republican presidential convention of appointment of the year. He predicted that the convention will be impasse and after some other candidates have reached their peak, a certain group of 12-15 men tired and exhausted, will take over and carry out the nomination. Harding rose to power during this era. The prediction was right; this is because, in the 1920, the fragmented Republican convention appointed Warren, a United...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Aristotle
...will entertain towards his friend, as toward another self.’ (Aristotle Book 9). In short, Aristotle is worth to be called “The Philosopher” for the extensive studies he initiated on a wide variety of subjects all with exceptional input that had profound influence on the world for centuries. His concepts have paved way for new dimensions of studies and many of them are still bone of contention among scholars today. Works Cited Aristotle, Browne, Robert William & Bohn, Henry G. The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle, Henry G. Bohn, 1853. Google Books. Aristotle. Butcher, S. H. Poetics. Cosimo, Inc, 2008. Print. Aristotle....
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Aristotle
.... However, it is when they are paired together for comparison that Aristotle's arguments seem frail. These are essentially two different systems believing and advocating in values that are quite different. They are not absolute systems, and hence might have their share of problems. Yet, Aristotle insists on comparing the voids between both theories as the same, by exemplifying that "all existing things do not have the same elements", thereby propagating the fact, that these two theorists may not have explained the concept in entirety. Precisely this last criticism by Aristotle also ironically becomes a criticism for his own critique. He questions in the book, "If forms...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Aristotle
...Epagoge is Greek for argument from induction. .... By extension, in Aristotle's Poetics, the character projected by a speaker, artist, etc. Thus in Aristotle's logic, the process of establishing a general proposition by induction (seeing the univers.il in the particular) or deductive reasoning in which a conclusion is derived from two premises is syllogism or Epagoge. In traditional logic, a syllogism is an inference in which one proposition (the conclusion) follows of necessity from two others (known as premises). In his Posterior Analytics, Aristotle sets out what seems to be a rather stringent method of acquiring scientific knowledge and understanding (episteme)....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The politics by Aristotle
...The Politics by Aristotle In discussing the concept of the slave, Aristotle makes a clear distinction between those individuals who are considered slaves as a result of one nation conquering another and those who ‘natural slaves.’ Physically, Aristotle says the slave is constructed in such a way as to make him suitable for the tasks required by manual labor while the master is given a more upright carriage suitable for military life, other civic duties and managerial occupations. However, Aristotle recognizes many intellectual and spiritual differences between the master and the slave as well, making it possible for those naturally built to be slaves...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Aristotle
...Of what procedure are nous and epagogē parts? What is the function of that procedure? What is the role of nous and epagogē within that process? What is nous? What is epagogē? (You do not have to answer the last two questions in that order.) How does epagogē work—that is, what is the process by which it produces its results? What are its results? What is distinctive and problematic in what Aristotle has to say about nous? Aristotle introduced nous and epagoge as parts of the scientific procedure and, thus vital components in obtaining scientific knowledge. Particularly, they figured in area of rhetorical reasoning and inquiry. Epagoge, in Aristotle’s theoretical inquiry, is the inductive procedure, which leads to the establishment... of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Ancient Political Thinkers - Socrates/Aristotle/Republic, Politics
...Ancient Political Thinkers - Socrates/Aristotle/"Republic", "Politics What is the final concept of ‘justice’ that Socrates explains in the Republic? Plato’s celebrated philosophical work The Republic (c. 380 BCE) provides the Socratic dialogue concerning the order and character of the City-State and the dialogues in the book, among Socrates and various Athenians and foreigners, are noted for the discussion about the meaning of justice. Significantly, the first book of The Republic offers proposes different definitions of justice such as returning debts owed and helping friends and Socrates finds these definitions as inadequate in certain contexts, because they lack rigidity. Socrates...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Aristotle's Theory
... Aristotle against Epiphenomenalism In the modern scientific knowledge, epiphenomenalism is a teaching, considering the mind and consciousness as phenomena, which only accompany physiological processes (Robinson). Epiphenomenalism suggests that mental processes do not play an active role in a causal link defining various physiological states. The mind-body problem is being examined through the denial of the significance of mental processes in the physiological functioning of the body. Analyzing the philosophy of Aristotle, one can argue that he does not support epiphenomenalism. Despite the fact that Aristotle believes that the soul exists until there is a body, the philosopher recognizes activity of the mental processes... and their...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Critique of Aristotle's Politics for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us