Download file to see previous pages...
Even though money is an inevitable factor, one cannot support the attitude of political parties in accepting campaign contribution from corporate lobbyists. Corporate lobbyists always acts against democracy and they stands only for their material benefits. Therefore, it should not allow political parties to accept campaign contributions from corporate lobbyists or it needs sufficient law making.
It is significant to mention that these financial dealings lack transparency and people cannot get reliable information. Researchers and experts mention that one cannot ignore the fact that it is hard to understand where the soft money is spent. Congress published Congressional Record, V. 148, Pt. 1, January 23, 2002 to February 13, 2002 and it notices that “When voters cannot discern where elected officials are getting the money to finance their campaign efforts, there is no accountability” (Congress 1304). Through contributing huge finance, corporate lobbyists and other pressure groups easily engage in political process and they often force to commit programs for their favor. The presence of unlimited and unregulated possessions can be constant to these kinds of expenditures.
One can find relevant examples which mention the negative impact of campaign contribution from corporate lobbyists in recent American politics. The way in which the Minnesota tribes defeat the Wiscosin Indian Tribes from starting a new casino near Minnesotta boarder can consider a perfect example. These Minnesotta tribes gave a huge amount of soft money for their safety (Congress 1305). At this juncture, it is clear for a reader that corporate lobbyists use elected officials for the successive implementation of their propaganda. All these activate promote chaos in administrative system and also create conflicts in law and order.
Another significant problem which underlines the disadvantage of campaign contribution from corporate
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The construction of a political character constitutes a combination of various elements making the individual’s personality. While some may be attributes of being associated with other people, the most image damaging characteristics in American politics remain to be, personal traits of political personalities.
Australia is among the several Western countries with the highest number of refugees for the past several years. In fact, they have humanitarian programs for refugees. However, most Australians do not agree with the entry of refugees in their country. Reasons for this are varied.
Tax incentives for charities actually reduce the amount of tax revenue for government, which, the government uses for social projects. There are some rules by IRS; one must abide by them if one wants to acquire the tax benefit of charitable donations. Some examples of people in the world who made huge charitable contributions are Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Oprah Winfrey.
This disclosure however from its definition leaves out the activities that falls under the Wood stock principles like the congressional testimony, the general public relations work and even the advocacy on behalf of the churches. This definition also conflicts with other words like consultant, this comes most so in the case where a person is called to consult on behalf of a group with an interest in the policy being debated.
The First Amendment did extend free speech rights to the citizens. However, the framers of the Constitution were simply not aware as to what extent the ramifications of the First Amendment will be interpreted in the future to extend free speech rights to the institutions like corporations.
It also gives information about the strengths and weaknesses of lobbyists and the process of being a certified lobbyist.
Another good source of information regarding lobbyists is the book written by Jeffrey M. Berry known as "The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups".
A careful examination of Enron and its political involvement through the mechanism of political contributions would appear to suggest a number of fairly reliable conclusions. First, Enron expected a variety of favors and preferences, both domestically and internationally, and these favors ranged from the deregulation of energy to political appointments.
Herein, the campaign that has been selected for the purpose of meeting the goal of this paper is the “Gabby Gifford Anti-Gun Campaign for Women”. The elements that would be evaluated in specific include
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Should politicians be allowed to accept campaign contributions from corporate lobbyists for FREE!