In the wake of the 20th century, the United States has undergone several advancements both in their industries and technology. Aside from these, the United States also has become the prime military force in the world. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
In the wake of the 20th century, the United States has undergone several advancements both in their industries and technology. Aside from these, the United States also has become the prime military force in the world. For decades, the United States has often played a part of being a policeman to the world; always to the rescue of oppressed countries and people, highlighted in events such as the World Wars and the various minor wars that occurred throughout the century. In the dawn of the new millennium, an infamous event happened that will forever be recorded in the chronicles of modern history. The attack on the towers of the World Trade Center and on the Pentagon has brought shattering headlines around the world. After this event, the globe witnessed how the United States, dubbed as the new Roman Empire, took on hand the actions that it believes to be against terrorism.The main purpose of this paper is to state and present the various allegations of Griffin and Scott in their book. Also, this paper is intended to scrutinize the allegations and provide some insight to the other side of the story and present some evidence that in turn will help in defending the government. This paper does not side with any of the opposing ideas since all the evidence provided by the authors are still not acknowledged by many.In the wake of the events that spawned a trail of wars in western and south Asia, a book that claims a conspiracy between the political and military leaders of the country has caused reverberations. The said book is the one that David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott wrote, entitled 9/11 and the American Empire. In this book, the two authors presented various arguments that claims that while the world watched in terror the September 11, 2001 attacks, little did they know that it was orchestrated by none other than the Bush administration. The claim is cited below:
"According to a fourth view of 9/11, the attacks were not merely foreknown by the Bush administration; they were orchestrated by it. Although thus far no poll has tried to find out how many Americans hold this view, polls in Canada and Germany some time back indicated that this view was then held by 15 to 20 percent of their people." (Griffin 2005)
In relation to the aforementioned claim, we are now presented with questions: Are the facts existing in the article enough to cement a conclusion in favor of the allegations Are the people really deceived into believing that this was a surprise attack to our country Was there really a conspiracy between the leaders of our country
In their claim, Griffin and Scott also mentioned that the attacks may be made by terrorists but was perceived by the Bush administration as an opportunity of expanding there so-called empire. This kind of issue is not new actually. During the Gulf War, Iraq laid claim to Kuwait. The United States decided to intervene and in the process liberated Kuwait. After the war, various issues claimed that the U.S. exploited Iraq and the only reason why the U.S. interceded is due to its interest on the rich oil fields.
Although the evidence presented by the authors are thoroughly detailed, so far, nothing of the allegations are proven. In addition to the primary allegations are questions that have surfaced in relation to the events that happened that fateful day. The first one is if the government knew what was going to happen. "They asked Schippers to use his influence to get the government to take action to prevent the attacks. Schippers was highly respected in Republican circles, especially because of his role in the impeachment of Clinton. And yet, he reported, Attorney General Ashcroft repeatedly failed to return his calls." (Griffin 2005). This statement is supposed to emphasize that yes, the government did know what was going to happen but did not do anything to stop it which in turn points out to the allegation that the government really did want the disaster to happen.
Another question that surfaced is why didn't the government stop the attacks since they have
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This paper mainly focuses on identifying the strategies that must be employed by the governing bodies to scale down the rate of economic decline. These strategies include trade liberalization, sound monetary policy and application of economic theory, based on empirical studies. The government should oversee specific training programs for managers.
The title of this chapter attempts to equate the anti-rent movement to the civil war. Primarily the anti-rent movement was a conflict mainly between farmers and landowners. Poor farmers were against the taking of their lands by their landlords citing their poor status.
It is the fifth part of a series of such compilations which have been done over a number of years. The articles compiled as part of the book were all published by academic specialists who are well versed about the topic on hand. Other than one piece done by a retired British diplomat which addresses the Massadik era that took place in Iran, all the other contributions are by academic experts.
While a great amount of research has been written on the various political events surrounding the attack, there are a few notable features that are recurrent among research texts. This essay considers findings from a number of these texts, reporting on elements that are thematic throughout them.
This essay discusses the controversy and effects behind massive immigration in to the United States. The rise to power of Fidel Castrol brought a shift in the foreign policy of his government. In 1965 president Fidel Castro allowed people seeking exile permit to leave the country through the Port of Camarioca.
Their dreams and the way in which they define themselves and their relationship with the world is extremely ordinary, usual and, indeed, there is nothing to distinguish them as unusual, as out of the ordinary, except white America's insistence on defining them as such.
Gordon is of the opinion that what is in practice at the moment is a tactical tit-for-tat that is not evoking the best of results. On the contrary, it is only exacerbating the present situation in the Middle East, where the whole idea of peace is fragile, to say the least.
At present America is a developed country and it expanded from small piece of lands along the Atlantic regions, and it includes all the land between Atlantic and Pacific oceans across the big North American continent. When analyzing the pages of history one can understand the dramatic changes that America has gone through in terms of population, economy and technology.
His book is a great insight into the Peurto Rican people both in their home and in Diaspora.
The writer clearly states in his introduction that he has two main themes that run throughout the book. The first is the strong mental state of nationhood that
Water managers in the arid regions of the Southwest have felt and equal measure of the fury of the changing climate. In the midst of all concerns, the National Climate Assessment body concludes that there is evidence of artificial
2 Pages(500 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the book report/review on your topic
"United States in XXI century"
with a personal 20% discount.