We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

How can we understand power in politics - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
Name Instructor Date How Can we Understand Power in Politics? Politics is one of the most influential aspects in the lives of the people. It carries some power that has very much influence on the way people perceive things and react to various situations…
Download full paper
How can we understand power in politics
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
How can we understand power in politics

Download file to see previous pages... This brings a sharp contention between those who try to understand the sociology behind these behaviours and the political scientists who do not believe and recognize that power can be held. Power in politics is viewed as either held or diffuse and unpredictable. Power is something that is beyond just an aspect of being violent. It has a lot to do with the influence over the people compared to being violent and aggressive despite the two components prevailing in politics. According to Hannah Arendt in her essay ‘On Violence’, there is a clear distinction between the concept of power and violence. Most of the modern theorists have developed arguments that have linked violence with excessive demonstration of power, but Arendt dispels this notion by pointing out that two aspects are not comparable. In fact, she points out that they are directly opposed. The first point that comes out clearly from the arguments raised is that power emanates from the will of the majority and cannot be coerced or influenced by violence in achieving its results. What happens is that the voluntary decision by the people prevails. In case violence is used to capture power, the same shall prevail in losing the power. Bureaucratic regimes are potential sources of violence because they attempt to distance themselves from the people that placed them in the powerful dockets. The missing links with the people stirs up a revolution and the ultimate result is violence (Arendt 42- 46). Another point of view is that power is pervasive and dispersed. It has been argued by some quarters of theorists that the people or groups hold power. Contrary to this view, Michael Foucault, a postmodern theorist observes that power cannot be localized, it can come from anywhere and it is everywhere. He continues to argue that power in politics is constituted through certain aspects of knowledge that is obtained in some scientific truth. It is apparent that every society comes with its version of truth that is shaped by the political and economic ideologies, the media and the education system that is in place. This means that despite the perception that some have taken power as oppressive, coercive and with negativity, there is positivity and productivity thereof. Foucault’s view agrees with that of Arendt by demonstrating that generalizing power in politics in the bad light of negativity, oppression, violence and coerciveness is not right (Foucault 777-790). Power is capable of presenting social discipline among the individuals and adherence to set regulations. It is not true that a subject will adhere to what is required of them just because power is exercised over them. At times, use of power demonstrates rebellion among the subjects. People have learnt how to behave rightly not because they are forced or coerced to do so. Power transcends politics and is more of a social issue; Foucault states that this is the reason why when revolutions occur they do not significantly influence the social order. Politics have several closely related factors; these are power, influence, control and authority. These aspects are often confused but power presents a lot of ambiguity in its understanding. According to Andreas Hillgruber power has a lot to do with influence over people, he notes ‘ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Vietnam: How We Got There
Washington continued its tradition of regarding Indochina as a particularly minor region. Formally the United States declared that the concern of Indochina’s future involved France, but eventually, top American officers started to pay more involved attention on Southeast Asia’s future (Gurtov 1967, 82).
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
Politics and media
Without the establishment of these common grounds, communication cannot take place (Darwish, 2008). Hence intersubjectivity is both a contributor and a vital product of communication. In order to achieve this sharing of cognitions, one needs to understand the other’s frame of reference.
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Progressive Politics and the Society
Communities are seen as collections of persons and households living together within a geographical; set up and in most cases, they share common links. They can be interpreted as groups of people living in the same environment while sharing common values through the organization is larger than a small village.
16 Pages(4000 words)Research Paper
Nuclear Power: Russia
that emerged to be world superpowers. The position that was acquired by the two nations soon after World War II pitched them into a bitter rivalry in all aspects, nuclear power possession not excluded. Thus, it is interesting to know more about Russia, how they got the information about US and Britain involvement in the secret plan of Manhattan project, their response to the implementation of the project and how they initiated their own projects to spearhead nuclear power establishment in their land (Hardesty, Eisman, and Sergei 19).
20 Pages(5000 words)Research Paper
Social Media Impact on How We Interact
ia as means of communication. Many activities for example running of businesses nowadays use digital media because of simplicity brought out by rising information technology. The use of digital technology brings about advantages as well as disadvantages to the using community.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
How Do We Select Our Life Mates
Abstract Social researchers study numerous human behaviors. One of them is the selection of ideal life mate. Both researchers and ordinary people pay paramount importance to this issue. The reason is obvious. Social sciences have put forward many theories and concepts in order to explain how one selects his or her life partner.
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper
How americans learn about politics
They do not care much about the political manifestations which are being handled within the country and hence they have little to do with it. They feel
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
From Modernisation Theory perspective, what are the advantages and disadvantages of using Edward Saids understanding of the relationship between knowledge, power and modes of representation in relation to the contemporary politics
His book Orientalism is a masterpiece in which he wrote about the Euro-Centric prejudice of the West against Islamic-Arab East. His work revolves around
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper
Power & Politics
The author states that coercive power often takes place when a person is forced to do any work or activity against his/her will. Reward power means to offer others with the necessary requirements and therefore to ask them to do certain tasks in exchange. The power which is invested in a role is called legitimate power.
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
People understand and sublimate lives value and happiness in work
These are the basic needs to avail a warm and comfortable life. However, these fundamental needs require substantial amount of money that should be logically
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic How can we understand power in politics for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us