To: THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. From: (Close trusted friend of the president) RE: IRAN and the Nuclear Question ISSUE There is no formal relationship between us [United States] and Iran all the way from 1980. The first diplomatic relationship between the US and Iran was established in the year 1883…
Download file to see previous pages...
As a result of all these occurrences, a group of revolutionary Iranian students apprehended the US Embassy in Iran (Tehran) and took 52 Americans as hostages. In response to this act, the United States broke the diplomatic relation with Iran in 1980. It is a fact that the US has, for a long time, been against Iran’s nuclear program. The nuclear program in Iran possesses a threat to both the US and the international community. In conjunction with the International community, the US has applied several methods to coerce Iran into engaging in discussions and addressing concerns over its nuclear program. One of the methods that have been applied to have Iran’s attention is sanctions that up to now, has proved futile. The Iran’s nuclear program is a bridge to weapons of mass destruction on both the US and the International community soils. The reality to the issue is that Iran’s nuclear program was launched by the help of the US in 1950s as part of the ‘’Atoms for Peace’’ program. The participation of the US and the Western European countries ended in 1979 after the Iranian revolution that overthrew the Iran’s Shah. In November 2011, the cooperation between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) significantly reduced after an IAEA report stated that Iran had undertaken research geared at nuclear weapons developments before 2003. The report alleged that Iran had conducted nuclear – related studies on nuclear weapons design, detonator developments, and multi-point initiation of explosives, and nuclear payload integration into a missile delivery vehicle. As per now, we [the US] and the international community believe in the credence of the IAEA 2011 report, and the main issue on the table is to compel Iran into discussions regarding its nuclear program. The International community’s sabotage operation on Iran’s nuclear program is active. According to an Iranian Fars News Agency, the Saudi Arabia and Israel’s Mossad intelligence division are co-inspiring to develop a computer worm which is worse than the Stuxnet malware that sabotaged Iran’s Uranium enrichment in 2010. This computer worm could be used to halt the functionality of Iran’s nuclear program in a matter of seconds. The Iranian Fars source mentioned that the recent agreement between Iran and the P5+1 (the US, Russia, China, France, and Britain plus Germany) made it difficult for the Saudi officials’ sabotage operations with the Saudi leader (Bandar) terming the move as the ‘’West’s treachery’’. According to the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, the November 23 agreement between the P5+1 and Iran was a historic mistake. From the November 17 Sunday Times report, Saudi officials and Israeli Mossad are working together to develop a contingency plan in case the Iran’s nuclear program is not adequately curtailed. The governments of Israel and Saudi Arabia both believe that negotiations with Iran could result in concessions being made to Iran, which according to them, is not an effective move in terminating Iran’s nuclear program. U.S. NATIONAL INTERESTS The United States’ sole interest in the Iran’s nuclear program is to prevent the development of a nuclear weapon. The US fears what the fate of its citizens and the international community would be, if Iran is powered with nuclear weapons. Your government knows that it is unrealistic to force Iran to abandon every part of its multibillion-dollar nuclear infrastructure.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Iran and Nuclear Question (Policy Brief/Diplomatic Cable/Memo) Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1497007-iran-and-nuclear-question-policy-brief-diplomatic
(Iran and Nuclear Question (Policy Brief/Diplomatic Cable/Memo) Essay)
“Iran and Nuclear Question (Policy Brief/Diplomatic Cable/Memo) Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1497007-iran-and-nuclear-question-policy-brief-diplomatic.
These are the world’s most deadly arsenal, and its effects have led to strict laws being passed to limit its spread. Iran has witnessed participation in these conventions to promote global peace through signing treaties that limit its activities in the creation of dangerous weapons.
US Policy Towards Iran
The issue of U.S sanctions imposed on Iran has existed for the last 30 years. Since 1979, the two countries have had minimal economic cooperation. The U.S government has been trying to influence the Iranian economy by altering its interaction with the international community.
Iran joined hands with America and other developed countries to establish power plants and to improve the existing nuclear power to help them in the future. The paper focuses on the nuclear power of Iran and to emphasize on the importance of nuclear power.
Today, five nations – the U.S., United Kingdom, Russia, China and France – are officially recognised as possessing nuclear weapons. Pakistan and India have tested nuclear weapons and it is not known if Israel possesses nuclear weapon capability. Recently, North
The number of nations seeking nuclear weapons today suggests that a nuclear arsenal may be considered a strategic asset as discussed by Paulikas (2006).
However, for many analysts, the existence of such weapons also comes with a responsibility to not to use them to
3). The economy itself is a mixed transition economy. In this way 50% of the economy is centrally planned, with its own stock exchange. This stock exchange represents over 40 industries.
In understanding Iran one of the central considerations is the nature of
the case, the court was deemed appropriate, in its function of regulating the fees paid to investment advisers; especially those within the mutual fund sector, as regulated in the aforementioned Act. In context, the investors viewed the fees as being not only excessive, but also
The Iran nuclear deal framework was an agreement reached between the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany (P5+1), the European Union and Iran. Negotiations that resulted in the development of the nuclear deal was carried out between foreign ministers of the countries in series of meetings.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Iran and Nuclear Question (Policy Brief/Diplomatic Cable/Memo) for FREE!