CA BUDGET ANALYSIS PAPER - Essay Example

However, following the 2007 – 2009 global recession that affected all economies including the United States, the education funding programs were slightly affected. For instance, some schools in different states are getting to the New Year with less state funding that it used to be in other years. Most of the sectors are worried with the declining trend in education funding programs (Oliff, Mai, and Palacios 01). There are claims that as the state and nation need new skills to master and adopt new and complex technologies to help in curbing the complex economy, the government shows a decline in state educational investment.

Naturally, lack or decline in funding most of the known state funded programs usually leads to gap in running and managing such programs; thus, threatening poor quality in services produced and rendered in such programs. Challenges Facing California on State Funded Programs Following the recession and global economic crisis, nearly all states’ funded programs are affected in one way or the other. In the case of California, the education has since received less funding per student compared to other years (A Parent's Guide to Charter School Funding Challenges 01).

These changes in the amount of fund per student affect the education services in the affected school. These effects are feared that may interfere with quality of education in California. Additionally, the changes in funding from states make schools to spend on large facility budgets towards chartering schools. Notably, it is these charters that now pay bills accrued by school including rents. These challenges in the state funded programs cause uncertainty in management that may largely interview with quality of services offered in such programs.

Pros and Cons of State Funded Programs The most dangerous part of the state funded programs is that such programs usually operate at the mercies of the state budget. In cases where the state gets broke such programs are usually affected and the same usually leads to changes in services delivery in such programs (Leachman and Ma 01). Notably, changes in the service delivery may affect the quality offered following the changes. For instance, following the reduction of the funds remitted to the schools, schools have reacted by reducing numbers of teacher so they may adjust to their budget.

It should be noted that as the number of teachers changes, the numbers of students usually remain constant or increases; therefore, burdening the remaining teachers. Few teachers working on many students or pupils will usually lead to poor quality of service delivery. Nonetheless, the state funded programs are usually monitored closely by the funding organ; therefore, such funding usually lead to quality service delivery. Additionally, funding state programs usually easy or reduces burden on other stakeholders.

For instance, funding education programs will reduce burden on parents especially those who are unable to pay for their children’s education comfortably. Effects of Funding or Not Funding State Funded Programs If state programs are not funded; for instance, if the education is not funded, both the parents and pupils will be affected; however, pupils will be affected immensely since these funded services are directly related to them. As had been mentioned, if education id not funded fully or completely, the affected schools will opt to reducing the number of staff and this will impact greatly on