Arguing About War by Michael Walzer - Essay Example

Humanitarian intervention has in the society with different results. Some countries have enjoyed success while others have sunk deeper into the challenge of governance. The ethics of war and the involvement of the various organizations will influence the nature of operations in a country. The theory holds that any action is by the extent of benefits or harms it is within the society.

According to the theory, the greater good means greater happiness, and the moral duty of the individual is to maximize human happiness. The problem with the theory is; the development of individuality, and encouraging the use of immoral actions to achieve success. According to Walzer, the humanitarian approach employed in the world has not been successful due to the several challenges associated with human behavior. In fact, society is into the right-wing and the liberal as recorded in the book Arguing About War. The 20th century is with a simple lesson on politics, which focuses on the motivation for political action.

The most lethal concept in the era is the ideology which is different from the accepted or focuses on the interests of the nation. The desire for wealth or money, power ignoble, and devotees to the criminal excess are the product of shifting ideologies. In fact, the challenge in society is the war between values and values against social pressures and the desire for wealth and money. The development of the concept of international security is a product of the war study and its effect on society. The book by Walzer covers the contemporary issues associated with war the impact of the various issues and the role of humanitarian intervention. It describes accurately, the challenges faced by countries and organizations seeking to help or support society and the impact of global politics in the whole process.

Humanitarian intervention is an armed intervention without the agreement of the other state to which the invasion occurs. In fact, it focuses on combating humanitarian disasters rather than invasion based on the country’s interest. The focus of the humanitarian intervention is to capture or reduce large-scale violation of human rights with the focus being on stopping the violation of human rights. The challenge posed by the process is massive. However, Michael Walzer states that human intervention is when it responds to the need of the citizens or acts that shock the moral conscience of mankind. In other words, states cannot kill or attack citizens from other states legitimately, not even within their borders are they allowed to do the same. Despite the existence of a justifiable ground for humanitarian intervention, the level or point at which human intervention occurs is an issue of great debate. In fact, the agreement has never been reached on whether to have a standard approach or evaluate the situations independently. However, according to Walzer human intervention has improved the level of security and protection of human rights within the society. The first obligation of the government is to offer security, but it may become unattainable leading to the need for humanitarian intervention.

After the world war, the world plunged into a state of uncertainty. Instead of peace, there were minor conflicts within the states leading to genocide and ethnic cleansing. However, the challenge of the new threats led to the development of various approaches to security and protection of human rights within the state via an international outlook. In fact, the major challenge of the country was the shifting ideologies and the existence of external aggression. In the 1990s, the major issue raised was the level or at which point the international community should intervene in the process which led to improved awareness. Walzer focuses on the ideologies associated with war and humanitarian intervention by evaluating the values and standards of operations. In fact, the humanitarian intervention witnessed in the world is a product of the international community engaging in the protection of the rights of the people. However, the challenge of humanitarian intervention is the level of intervention.