Was World War Two a Good War - Essay Example

Was World War II (WWII) a “good war?” Why or why Political world to utilizes combat where possible in its quest to resolve differences and bring peace. However, this intention to some influential icons whose ambitions politically is to maintain power and humiliate fellow regions does not have any significant implication meant for good. Hence, prompt to waging of intense retaliations not only by those affected but also from allies of the humiliated whereby the latter their core intention is to induce order as well as bringing to end bad political ideals. This is because applications of these ideals in the world or regions dominated by influential persons in question only lead to immense human suffering and detrimental effects on the affected states’ economies. This is evident with the commencement of WWII, which historically despite cited as a “good war” in terms of ending repressive regimes, is far from it due to then its associated mass extermination of human life and crippling of allies’ economies. Contrary to numerous scholars’ works not citing detrimental effects of the war, it yielded to immense loss of lives to both civilians and those who engaged autocratic or “evil forces” as commonly preferred. As Mooney states, “roughly 6 million Jews and approximately 4 million others were murdered in the “Holocaust” (Mooney, 110).” Hence, revealing the utter retaliations of autocratic forces after realizing their victims of the day had support from external world, which was ready for engagements. However, numerous history scholars despite noticing this utter humiliation tend to incline towards adopting political perspective while ignoring scars the war left in people’s hearts. Most of the retaliations made by the then “evil forces/powers” of the day encompassed unleashing terror on those who could not defend themselves. The core reason was to irritate other global blocs who through their actions of inducing peace seemed to defend victims despite most of them being not their citizens. However, these efforts by sympathizing blocs instead of bringing relieve to the suffering continued to worsen while trying to eliminate totalitarian regimes. According to Mooney’s sentiments, “100,000 more eventually died from burns and radiation sickness… On 9 August a second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing 80,000 more Japanese (Mooney, 119).” This was more than what opposing peaceful blocs together with their allies of the then campaigned while in the quest of inducing peace and saving life. It is irrefutable WWII despite attributed with overthrowing and containing the then tyrannical powers, it yielded to the destruction and stagnation of numerous global economies. This is in terms of numerous resources that went into supporting the military forces against their autocratic enemies, which was not an easy task. According to Ernie, “For a mile out from the beach there were scores of tanks and trucks and boats that you could no longer see, for they were at the bottom of the water - swamped by overloading, or hit by shells, or sunk by mines (Ernie, “The Horrible Waste of War”).” This was one of the numerous destructions evidenced on both sides as each pioneering state solicited monetary and weaponry support from respective allies. Hence, rendering the war as the most expensive the world has ever had, which somehow crippled entire global economy. It also led to the disruption of family structure whose effect is still evident to date. The female gender ended up assuming male’s occupations where they worked in industries to support the then ongoing combat. During then, almost all men comprising the energetic gap ganged together compelled by their respective states to wage war against tyrannical powers. This is evident in Sauer’s confession citing, “I worked seven days a week” (Sauer, “The War Changed My Life Completely”). Hence, revealing utter situation she had to undergo due to the lack of labor force in industrial firms where the male’s gender used to work. Based on her confession, this was not an easy task for women due to the fact there was no time off thereby claiming, “That was a hard thing to do” (Sauer, “The War Changed My Life Completely”). The war after its commencement, the pioneering side thought it would only take a short duration then come to a complete end but this proved otherwise thus leading to extreme termination of human life. According to lecture notes, “In the mid 1930, Japan launched a bloody, all-out assault on China, and 300,000 Chinese were killed in the Nanking Holocaust (Lecture notes, Nov 6 2013).” To date some of the then mass killings in quest of attaining peace have never found their equal. This is makes the entire combat’s intentions being ironical because instead of saving life the action resulted not only to mass extermination of humanity but also somehow crippling economies. According to lecture notes, “in July 1944 allied bombing of Hamburg estimate 40,000 people killed (Lecture notes, Nov 6 2013).” Comprising this big numbers were civilians whom the “good forces” then were intending to safe but due to unavoidable situations attacking them together with their militia who were afflicting them. Comparing death tolls for militia and civilians, the latter were the ones who experienced immense loss not only bodily but also psychological, emotional and loosing their people. The former in their quest to attain peace or cause more disorder from both sides, were implementing ideas of their pioneering top commanders. Unfortunately, civilians found themselves in between where they acted as the two sides’ respective “battlefields”. As Heilbrunn explains, there were “extermination of two million people, most of whom were Jewish, in the General Government of Poland by the end of 1943 (Heilbrunn). This is also evident in Kirsch stating Davies’ expression concerning mass extermination saying, “America lost 143,000 soldiers in the fight against Germany - while the Soviet Union lost 11 million (Kirsch, “Is World War II Still ‘the Good War’?”). In conclusion, WWII despite numerous scholars currently only focusing on its political benefits, immensely contributed to the extermination of numerous people. Most of those affected were civilians whom the two sides took to be their “battle fields” despite pioneering “good forces” waging war to ensure peace. In addition, the war yielded to the disruption of family structure where the female gender ended up assuming roles, which their male counterparts used to do due to lack of labor force; evident even to date. Destruction also encompassed crippling respective states’ economies as most of them then channeled resources to the war with the intention of crashing completely “evil forces”. Work Cited Adam, Kirsch. Is World War II Still ‘the Good War’? Ernie, Pyle. The Horrible Waste of War. 16 June 1944. Lecture notes. 6 November 2013. Mooney, Matthew. History of the U.S. To 1865; Researched and written especially for SBCC History 101. 2013 Fall. Print.  Sauer, Inez. The War Changed My Life Completely (c. 1943). Read More