We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Comparing Rawls and Hayek - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Name: Instructor: University: Course: Date: Comparing Rawls and Hayek Friedrich Hayek was a philosopher who was from Britain. Majority of his writings were from the experience of his world war one, since he had served as a soldier during the war. Hayek developed the theory of freedom from his need to control the mistakes he did and witnessed during the First World War…
Download full paper
Comparing Rawls and Hayek
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Comparing Rawls and Hayek

Download file to see previous pages... Hayek highlights that freedom entailed acting on an individual’s own free will and not on the will or command of others or situations. He covers all the types of freedom that he experienced in the First World War that is political freedom, personal freedom and economic freedom. On the other hand, John Rawls was a philosopher who originated from America and fought or participated in the Second World War. He was responsible for developing the theory of justice which was a concept of ethical, rationality, law, equity and fairness (Bellamy). Rawls argues that justice is fairness and the same justice is responsible for the existence of liberty within the society. Rawls believes that for social institutions to be operational or function properly, justice is necessary in forming the foundations, defining the base and also veiling the position of ignorance within the society. Hayek and Rawls both supported liberalism in their different writings and speech. They talked in unison that people were free to exercise their ideas without barriers as long as their idea were not ill motivated or malicious in any way and that the state was there to support them and ensure that their rights, that is of freedom of speech, were practiced and equally enjoyed by all individuals from different classes, ages, ethnical backgrounds and races. Hayek and Rawls both agreed that the government was created for the citizens, by the citizens and to serve the citizens and rebuffed other notion of the other way round that the citizens were meant to serve the government. They were both liberal as they preached the principles of justice, freedom and equality to the public as they both advocated for basic rights such like education, food, shelter, medication and clothing to all citizens. Both Hayek and Rawls were using the society as their main source of reference in their various thoughts and intransient differences, thereby making the citizens the centre of their struggles for freedom and justice. This is as per what they experienced in world war one and world war two respectively. The various ideas they tried to put in action were all directed towards the unification of their different ideologies, in favor of the citizens, on how things are done or should be carried out within the society (Hayek 78). Both Hayek and Rawls place emphasis on Rawls theory of the veil of ignorance intended to make us blind to our unique differences as human beings. They both campaign on the interests of democracy as they try to shun the inhabitants of a strong and peacefully democracy. They both argue that in the interest of democracy, ideologies should be placed together to accommodate the different thoughts and lifestyles of individuals coming from different backgrounds and possessing different ideologies in the society. This is because the society consists if unique human beings with unique qualities, backgrounds, class and preferences. However, Rawls and Hayek do not come to an agreement thus do not resolve their arguments in order to find solutions and how solutions are reached in different situations. In fact, they completely clash and each has their own viewpoint of the solution to their matching theories and ideologies. Rawls argues that agreements on particular matters can be reached whereas Hayek does not believe that this can happen. Hayek believes that the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Compare and contrast the policy implications of the theories of justice in the works of John Rawls and Friedrich von Hayek. Illu
Connin substantiates this argument by emphasising that Frederick Hayek, clearly in a quite concise and enigmatic statement, has adopted the two premises of Rawls without any doubts (Wood & Woods 1991). The argument of Connin is that, because of the ‘ambiguity’ of the difference theory and the primacy given to the first theory, left scholars have to be careful in applying the theory of Rawls to support egalitarian, and particularly socialist, distribution strategies (ibid, p.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Hayek Essay Assignment The Road to Serfdom
He wrote, “We have progressively abandoned that freedom in economic affairs without which personal and political freedom has never existed in the past” (Hayek 67). From this perspective, Hayek continues to lay out his theories and beliefs about where the conception of the state is going based on its current trends.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Is Spontaneous Order a Form of Social Justice for Hayek
The objective will be achieved through a brief explanation of the terms like spontaneous order and social justice separately. The other supporting terms like the rule of law and catallaxy would also be discussed in general to provide a clear idea about all.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Preview 8 Hayek, The Road to Serfdom
In the book The Road to Serfdom, the author points out at pertinent issues which need to be addressed as far as acquisition of happiness and humankind peace are concerned. To make the issues come out clearly, he examines certain attitudes as usually displayed by man regarding man’s efforts to have peace and live in happiness.in regard to this, he points out that “Planning is the grand panacea of our age.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
In the present age of technological enlightenment, these thinkers have their own arguments towards the roots and basis of religion. In fact, frequent discoveries of new planets and scientific inventions have branded different religions as dogma, based on ethical dilemma.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Distributive justice, position of John Rawls,Robert Nozick, Milton Friedman, James Donaldson(comparing the relationship of state
The concept takes into account the goods available for distribution, the distribution process and the resultant allocation amongst the members of the society (Lamont 34). Distributive justice, unlike the just process, emphasizes the outcomes of the distributive process.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Rawls A theory of Justice
Rawls's in his book A Theory of Justice has constructed a hypothetical theory which is system based on equality that he calls "Justice as Fairness". Rawls's social theory discusses the role of institutions in a society, which aggravate bitterness creating isolation.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Rawls Theory of Justice
However, Rawls in concept of distributive justice goes further in hypothesizing the justice theory under the justice as fairness. The justice as fairness has two principle to drive the following Rawlsian principles of justice the first one is that the liberty principle and the second is the difference principle.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Rawls thinking
What he thought about international relations is another, interesting question. Although he claimed much of his thinking on the subject had practical implications, it was for the most part, especially in Law of Peoples, utopianism.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Rules that regulated colleges were outdated and were not appropriate for the college students whose ages were different from corresponding students’ ages
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Comparing Rawls and Hayek for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us