We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Hobbes & Unlimited Government - Essay Example

Hobbes posits that the government id the only thing that can protect mankind from the fatal consequences of natural liberty (Cox 38). This paper provides an explanation of Hobbes’s arguments in favor of unlimited government, criticisms advanced against these arguments, and Hobbes’s possible reactions to these criticisms.
According to Hobbes, humankind was originally created into the state of nature, where they were perfectly free. Life in the state of nature is characterized by solitude, brutality, poverty, nasty, and short-lived. The state of nature is undesirable and should be avoided because when man lives without a common authority, there will be war, man against man (Wolfenden1). Hobbes saw a strong government to be the necessary tool to avoid civil war and disorder basing his arguments on nature. Therefore, in order to eliminate this state of nature, sovereignty should be established as this will help in promoting peace. Hobbes’s is main argument for a sovereign society was that any form of government is better than the state of nature and that absolute sovereignty is most likely to eradicate completely the state of nature since for him, absolute sovereignty has unlimited power. Furthermore, Hobbes posits that society can only be peaceful and stable when it is subjected to an absolute sovereign. Man cannot coexist peacefully without a strong established authority since man is quarrelsome in nature (Wolfenden, p.1).
Since life in the state of nature is not good for anyone and following

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

SA Adventures Unlimited
The first organized trip by SA Adventures Unlimited which was a three-week excursion across Ecuador and Peru that became a resounding success which prompted the business to expand its size and scope. From that single trip, it has grown to having 16 different excursions
5 pages (1250 words)Essay
Are Hobbes theories of Politics on a Sicence of Human Nature as scientific as he might like to think
According to the research findings it can therefore be said that Hobbes argues that society needs an absolute sovereign who exerts control over a wide range of areas, and whom the subjects are not free to displace or to disagree with. He considers this to be necessary because of the inherent nature of humans that leads to conflict.
10 pages (2500 words)Essay
Fobbes is best known for his work in political philosophy and in the social sciences although he contributed to a diverse range of academic disciplines including physics of gases, geometry, history, ethics, general philosophy, theology and political science (Bunce & Meadowcroft 21).
5 pages (1250 words)Essay
Hobbes and Locke - Philosophy Paper
He explained that when all men lived without a strong power, they was in the state of war, and "such a war as is of every man against every man" (Hobbes, Chapter XIII). Hobbes therefore supposed that a general inclination of all mankind, a perpetual and restless desire of power after power.
5 pages (1250 words)Essay
Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke/pro John Locke
Indeed, it would hardly be an exaggeration were one to claim that the one's theory is the antithesis of the other's. The aforementioned is evidenced in the fact that both had very different notions of human nature and, accordingly, of the rationale behind the entry of citizens into a social contract, the implications of the said contracts and the rights of the populace versus the limits of government.
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Human Nature and Government
For example, Plato, the second othe trio of ancient Greeks laid the philosophical foundations of Western culture, saw man's true nature as rational and believed that civilized society must be organized, and civilized life conducted according to rational principles.
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Analyse & assess how hobbes & locke's views differ on the state of nature, the social contract, and the system of government. To what extent was each philosophe
Their arguments were influenced by their historical experiences. They were both social contract theorists and natural law theorists but beyond this, their views differed on the state of nature, the social contract, and the system of
5 pages (1250 words)Essay
Culture and ethical values
tise, Leviathan, Hobbes claims that men are naturally selfish and suspicious of the actions of others; this leads them to commit aggressive preventive acts to secure their lives (1651/2005). Thus, men come together in the state of nature to form a social contract in order to
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Compare Hobbes' and Locke's understanding of the state of nature and of natural law. Who is more convincing
he social contract treatise to reach the surprising conclusion that people have to surrender to the power and authority of a supreme and powerful ruler. His conclusion was reached due to his idea that a state of war is the state of nature. He thought there has to be a supreme
8 pages (2000 words)Essay
Analyse and assess Rousseau, Marx OR Nietzsches critique of Hobbes and/or Locke
Moreover, access to nutritious food, clean water, decent clothing and safety shelters remain a core projects in many nations. Thomas Hobbes believed that, in the society, no one is supposed
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
the troublesome of humankind, formation of a commonwealth is logical and necessary in order to maintain peace and security through a covenant....
Through this covenant, individuals surrender their freedom to Leviathan, the state, in order to escape from the terrible life in the state of nature. Under the monarch government, all the private and public interests are the same. However, he says that the authority of any government should stand for challenge by people because the government is a commonwealth. Moreover, Hobbes argues that monarch authority is the best since it concentrates power without any constraints (Wolfenden1). Some criticisms have been advanced against Hobbes’s arguments. Firstly, his theoretical explanation about the formation of the government is cannot be applied practically. Hobbes claims that all governments are formed through a covenant, but this is not the case because governments are imposed on willing subjects. Hobbes himself seems to justify this by stating that all men behaving rationally would want to consent to the commonwealth since the alternative, that is, the state of nature is so terrible and unappealing and actually no one would wish to leave in that state (Wolfenden1). Another criticism against Hobbes’ arguments was advanced by one of his main opponents, John Locke. Unlike Hobbes, Locke presented strong arguments for limited government. According to Locke, the state of nature is actually of freedom since no man is expected to obey any other and that there are laws of nature that guide individuals and ensure that they coexist peacefully (Dawkins). This criticizes Hobbes’ stand that the state of nature is unappealing and that man can only coexist peacefully in the presence of absolute authority. However, based on the first criticism, Hobbes would reply by stating that it is only when individuals come together to form a commonwealth


According to Hobbes, absolute monarchy is the best form of government since it is the only one that guarantees individuals absolute peace enabling them to coexist harmoniously to avoid the state of war. …
Author : shannastiedeman
Download 1
Hobbes & Unlimited Government
Read TextPreview
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Essay on topic Hobbes & Unlimited Government for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us