The Communist Manifesto
The class system has become deeply embedded in our society and the society has been divided into different segments due to this system. The gap between the elite class and the working class keeps on increasing. …
Download file to see previous pages...
This is because the framework of our society has been modeled by the elite groups who have structured the financial markets in a way that they achieve the maximum financial gains and keep on becoming richer whereas the working class does not gain much benefit. Thus, the rich individuals keep on becoming richer whereas the working class still struggles owing to their financial crisis. The existence of classes in the society is due to the persistence of capitalism where all the profits and the gains go in private hands and are not distributed evenly. Thus, the wealth remains in the hands of few and the working class keeps on struggling for financial benefits. A change is needed in the society so that equal opportunities of achieving success are created for all the members of the society. The working class and the elite groups are both reliant on each other and one cannot function properly without the other one. This can be understood as the upper class invests and it is the working class that works to reap the investment and provide for profits. When the functioning of both the classes runs hand in hand, the success should also be equally shared rather than the bounties only being granted to the upper class. The maximum share of the benefits is only gained by the elite class and thus they keep on becoming richer and this leads to an increase in the gap between the rich and the poor.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Thus, we can find in most libraries perspectives like Marxist sociology. On the other hand, we have works such as those by Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, both of whom have sociological perspectives that compete with and contradict Marxist perspectives. Another possible way of viewing the matter is that the ideas of Weber and Durkheim are sociological thought while the ideas of Marx are basically ideology not sociology.
Communist manifesto Your name Course Instructor Date Communist manifesto Industrial Revolution and the rise of various socialist movements in Europe in the early 19th century Studies have shown that powerful and populous European monarchy during the political revolutions in North American colonies of Britain ignited a variety of revolutionary movements in Latin America, Haiti, and Europe in initiating seemingly and profound irreversible effects on western society.
In that perspective, as per Marx, the rise of the contemporary bourgeois society is not a novelty or a ground breaking change, but rather the sprouting of a new system endowed with all the ills inherent in the previous feudalistic or class based societies.
This acts as the motivating force behind the development of the ideas. The relationship between classes is classified as an era of the means of production. However, this relationship does not exist as it becomes incompatible with the developing forces of production.
Today, the class struggle, is as real as it was then during French revolution. The middle class has taken the place of the bourgeoisie while workers and unemployed represent the proletariats. According to Marx, the middle class interest for a humongous profit would exploit the labor force due to forces of demand in the market.
A Critical Analysis of “The Communist Manifesto”. In 1848, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels together wrote the book, “The Communist Manifesto” which is often thought to one of the most powerful political manuscripts in modern world. It is said that the “Communist Manifesto” is the Bible of the communists.
He presents his suppositions about the operation of the society and politics. According to the authors, rising industrial workers exploitation will ultimately lead to a revolution under which capitalism is overturned. Marx’s theories about the society and politics reflect on the difficulties faced be industrial workers, who lived in abject poverty and worked in awful conditions with minimal political representation.
With market expansion, mercantilism paved the way for capitalism. However, with all its virtues, capitalism gave rise to inequality of income and wealth, resulting in inequality of economic and political power. The conflict between the bourgeoisies and proletariat worried many thinkers.