The Right of Habeas Corpus Instructor Date Introduction The attacks on the World Trade Centre towers in America on the 11th of September 2011 became a starting point to war on terror. The U.S government ultimately declared war on terror which later led to the death of Osama Bin Laden after a track period of ten years…
Download file to see previous pages...
The work that follows discusses the right of habeas corpus in the war on terror and its historical evolution. Historical Evolution of habeas corpus According to English tradition, habeas corpus fought for liberty of citizens after English land owners forced it on King John in their constitutional document named Magna Charta (Halliday, 2010). The constitutional document declared that no seizure, imprisonment, exile or injury shall occur on anyone except by lawful judgment by the law of the land. In other words everyone had a right to freedom unless they pass through due law process. The common-law courts became the first to use habeas corpus in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries competing with feudal courts, which local land owners controlled (King & Hoffmann, 2011:). These feudal courts had no consistency in their procedures, and the common-law courts began issuing orders demanding release of prisoners in the feudal courts. According to the U.S tradition, Americans believed habeas corpus as a weapon used to defend an individual’s liberty, and planned to protect it from suspension in times of peace through inclusion of a provision in Article I of their constitution (King & Hoffmann, 2011:). ...
?s war against terrorism, habeas corpus checks abuse of government power on alleged terrorists or suspected aliens or criminals to ensure protection of individuals’ liberty. Examples from U.S. history of the suspension of habeas corpus and their applicability to the present There are several examples of suspension of habeas corpus in the United States history, which are in application at present. An example of habeas corpus suspension is during the reign of Abraham Lincoln. Although authorizing order of the suspension took place in the year 1861, the suspension took place in March 1863 (Dueholm, 2008). The orders given stated that, first, throughout the war period, any person committing a disloyal practice or giving aid to rebels against the U.S authority would be liable to punishment by military commission or courts martial. Secondly, the orders stated that the suspension of habeas corpus was in respect to all persons arrested in places confined by military commission or authority. As Article I in the U. S constitution stated, the government had authority to suspend the writ of habeas corpus incase there is risk of security, and when the public safety requires it. Lincoln got authority to suspend habeas corpus after Congress passed an act, two years to the war (Dueholm, 2008). According to the article, the president had executive power vested in them, which gave authority to conduct any changes in the government. The suspension of habeas corpus still applies at present, as the president still has powers to execute changes in the government. Another example in U. S history is seen when Bush signed a law in October 2006 that suspended the rights of habeas corpus to persons whom United States considered an enemy in the war against terror (Longley, 2013). However, this
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It also allows detained suspects to challenge the legality and constitutionality of their arrest and confinement. Unfortunately, according to recent studies, court cases, and cases of suspension of the habeas corpus, this essential aspect of the U.S legal system has not turned out to the crucial check it was expected it to be (Stone, 2004, P.
For quite a while now, repression has been the answer to questions regarding security threats to the US. These activities, when critically analyzed, have been digging deep into lack of freedom for no particular reason. This paper takes a look at civil liberties that citizens are entitled to and the violations of these rights that occur in the course of fighting crime.
The United States, who is also the super power country in the world history since the end of the cold war marked by the falling of the berlin wall, has been involved in a number of war with other antagonistic countries around the world mainly from the Arabian states
government indicate that in 2004 alone, terrorist attacks increased and the death toll for such attacks reached close to 2,000 deaths documented from different parts of the globe (1). Just as various technological advancements in civil and international defense have
History of the writ of ‘habeas corpus’ can be traced to the early thirteenth century when the term was quite common as a language of civil procedure suggesting that it must have developed much earlier. The term ‘habeas corpus’ represents a
In order to challenge or proving the legality of a prisoner’s imprisonment, the Habeas Corpus writ does not include the accounts of prisoner’s virtue or fault. As per this plan, initially the court will
Habeas corpus is built on the premises that a government or law enforcement agencies only have two options that include charging an individual or letting them enjoy their liberty (The Rutherford Institute, 2015). In 1801 president Thomas Jefferson reiterated the critical
ights of the prisoners were never considered since the place where they were kept was beyond the reach of the constitution of the United States of America. It was the duty of the Supreme Court to protect the rights of the prisoners by the use of Habeas Corpus and given orders of
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror for FREE!