The paper "The habeas laws" examines the right of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror on the bid to offer protection to the detainees at GITMO and it origin development and existence in the American and British context today…
Download file to see previous pages...
. The notable ones among these include the Vietnamese war, the war with the Iraqi government under the strong leadership of the famous President Sadam Hussein, the war against Osama bin Laden and his Afghanistan based terrorists group, The Al Qaeda, commonly known as the war on terror are some of the most recognized wars that the America government has fought since the end of the cold wars. The war on terror against the terror group of Afghanistan under the leadership of Osama bin Laden begun as a result of the bombing attacks on the twins tower and world trade center in Washington DC which led to the death of hundreds of people, dozens escaping with injuries of various degrees and thousands around the world grieving for the loss of their loved ones, friends and relatives.
Over seven hundred prisoners have been captured In relation to these attacks, a couple of them have been tried and released without fines while some of them, around 169 are still serving jail terms in GITMO, a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, on land leased from the government of Cuba. The bush administration chose on this land for the detention of these prisoners in order to escape the legal challenges that would arise from the supreme courts of America questioning the authenticity for the indefinite detention of the prisoners of war by the bush administration contrary to the requirements of the habeas corpus laws which gives rights to the detainees to be heard before detainment. The habeas corpus laws states that, any persons detained by the government is entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention, that is, the law protects any detainee from detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence which is in line with article 1, section 9 of the constitution of the united states of America which states that “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." (Jackson, 2006, 312) This paper will examine the right of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror on the bid to offer protection to the detainees at GITMO and it origin development and existence in the American and British context today. The general meaning of the right of habeas corpus in the U.S. Constitution The habeas laws found their way into the American constitution through the suspension laws defined in the constitution of the United States of America which included the common laws of England. As a result this law was supported by the enactment of the article 1 section 9, clause 2 of the constitution demanding that “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it." (Turner, 2002, 115) Carpenter notes that from the onset of this enactment, the constitution of the united states accords every person an undisputable right to make a plea to the federal courts for the summons of habeas corpus in case of any form of detention filled as pro se cases whereby the government is usually called upon to answer before the court the logical reason behind the arrest and detention of an individual by state authorities (Carpenter, 1902, 25). The habeas laws were then transmitted down to the individual state governments which as well allow their respective citizens to petition the state authorities in their own state courts with respect to their individual state constitutions when they happened to be sentenced by the state authorities. The federal habeas did not apply to those under police custody even up to the time of the war on terrorism. In order to ensure that state courts implement the federal
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
At this point, there are some justifications that are connected to war. This is in reflection to the reasoning behind the eruption of war between countries, states and among regions. In simple terms, jus ad bellum is the law that has been instated to justify the eruption of war between involved parties (Chan, 2012:12).
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that every organization adherence to labor issues is important. Companies spend large amounts of money each year on their legal departments to make sure that they are not at risk in any manner which can bring bad name for the sake of their organization. They make sure everything is kept intact, as much as possible.
It also allows detained suspects to challenge the legality and constitutionality of their arrest and confinement. Unfortunately, according to recent studies, court cases, and cases of suspension of the habeas corpus, this essential aspect of the U.S legal system has not turned out to the crucial check it was expected it to be (Stone, 2004, P.
It has compromised the liberty of civilians and the execution of justice on suspects, where institutions or individuals fighting for suspects’ rights face opposition from corridors of justice. This led to introduction of habeas corpus, which is a court order that directs a prison warden to produce and justify a prisoner’s detention (Longley, 2013).
The availability of post-conviction trial is particularly designed to reduce the probability of convicting a truly innocent person, thus administering justice. However, it has also become a way for some to delay execution, asking for an endless litigation of the case.
History of the writ of ‘habeas corpus’ can be traced to the early thirteenth century when the term was quite common as a language of civil procedure suggesting that it must have developed much earlier. The term ‘habeas corpus’ represents a
In order to challenge or proving the legality of a prisoner’s imprisonment, the Habeas Corpus writ does not include the accounts of prisoner’s virtue or fault. As per this plan, initially the court will
Habeas corpus is built on the premises that a government or law enforcement agencies only have two options that include charging an individual or letting them enjoy their liberty (The Rutherford Institute, 2015). In 1801 president Thomas Jefferson reiterated the critical
ights of the prisoners were never considered since the place where they were kept was beyond the reach of the constitution of the United States of America. It was the duty of the Supreme Court to protect the rights of the prisoners by the use of Habeas Corpus and given orders of
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The habeas laws for FREE!