We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution?
The founding fathers of federalism for United States of America had great expectation and a desire for a functional government, to maintain order in the nation…
Download full paper
Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution

Download file to see previous pages... The push and the predicted effects of the constitution however created opposing forces to the ratification of the U.S. constitution. The federalists strongly supported the constitution and its formation of the central government because the formerly relied confederation articles were ineffective, and a strong national government would be able to control uncooperative states and excess powers of foreign policies that affected the U.S., and protect the right of its people who had delegated their powers back to the government. The anti-federalists had raised several objections over the approval of the constitution by the states and their population with respect to the envisioned ramifications, arguing that it would burden Americans in their future. Earlier on, the anti-federalist warned that State power would be threatened by a strong national government, where the centre of gravity would shift to the national government (“Antifederalists” gps.edu). Although power sharing between the national and States’ government was supported by both, the risk of giving too much power as supremacy to the national government at the expense of the States would be high. Considering the challenges facing the new republic, federal opposition “insisted that the freedom won by the Revolution would be best preserved not by expanding the power of the national government but by tightly circumscribing its power” (Mooney 51)....
The anti-federalists objections pushed federalists to include a bill of rights to guarantee civil liberties to the people. The aim of the opposition on the bill of rights was to limit the powers of the central government to prevent intrusion into the state powers. To both of the parties’ achievements, the bill was later adopted and the few states which were reluctant to ratify the constitution became convinced. First of all, the 10th amendment of the constitution only clarified the existing enumeration powers of the federal government, but refused to adjust its powers to make a change. As a result, the States felt obliged to support the constitution, due to the assurance of the tenth amendment, which confirmed that powers not delegated to the central government would reside with the respective States (Mooney 58). In other words, it was a meander to achieve support of the states by limiting the federal government the right to interfere with individuals and not the state. Nothing was new because individuals were already protected by the bill of rights in the respective States constitutions; the only change was its further inclusion in the national constitution, yet the federal powers over war, taxes, commerce, and implied powers were not restricted by the amendment (Dry 5). Today everyone realizes and sympathizes with the anti- federalist opposition for their fear of constitution to leave out the bill of rights that turned out to be very essential. Even with the 1st enactment of the bill of rights, suppressive scenarios like the approval of the Alien and Sedition Acts that threatened foreigners’ liberty, and seriously limited freedom of speech and especially of the press affirmed anti-federalist argument. The inclusion of the bill of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution
On the other hand, those who had various objections to the constitution were labeled as the Anti-federalists. The Anti-federalists had a variety of objections to the constitution. However, they were all united by their belief that liberty could only be secured in a small republic with limited powers in which the rulers were close to.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Essential Question: Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution Why or w
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams and John Adams were all parts of their particular Colonial councils some years soon after the Declaration of Independence. This exposed them to the means of governance and enabled them to administer the new country soon after the independence and plant the ideals of federalism.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
American Constitution of 1787 and pluralism
American Constitution of 1787 and pluralism. The constitution of the United States of America was adopted on the 17th day of September in the year 1787. The constitution was passed by a constitutional convention that took place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Fallacies of the Anti-Federalists
Too many of the former British colonists, any centralized government represented the possibility of unchecked despotism, and it was this objection that galvanized the anti-Federalist resistance. The memory of the intrusive acts passed by Parliament made many fear that an unchecked federal government would behave in much the same fashion, swiftly casting aside its mandate to create a free land, deciding instead to establish domination over a people that had just left that sort of existence behind them.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Analytical essay on debate and conflict between federalists and anti federalists
Those in favor of the proposed constitution including Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay wrote a series of essays (85) that were published in newspapers referred to as the
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists
While each side had strong arguments to support their positions, the Anti-Federalists proved the most idealistic and democratic,
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Why did Antifederalists oppose Constitution
The national government should not be able to overrule the states. It should function as a way of providing essential services that the nation needed, like negotiating treaties and raising an
2 Pages(500 words)Admission/Application Essay
Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution
It is true that a central national government with the power to tax and regulate trade has the same system as that used by the British, but it does not mean that the
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Essay about: Were the Anti-Federalists correct Was the 1787 Constitution a betrayal of the American Revolution
They asserted that the people did not behave tyrannically, and instead, they only guaranteed American liberty (51). Anti-Federalists are wrong because the 1787 Constitution did not
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Antifederalists: critics of the constitution
As indicated in the article, America consisted of various groups that had distinct economic, social, and political life. In essence, Main has succeeded in showing that the
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us