We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Nuclear weapons - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Some nations own or possess nuclear weapons based on the legitimacy they place upon themselves, where they are termed as being a source of security. However, many other reasons for which these weapons are in use or exist, which form the base of this essay. …
Download full paper
Nuclear weapons
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Nuclear weapons

Download file to see previous pages... This is addition to looking at the consequences of having such weapons on the world in terms of economic and social implications. Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons states clearly that nuclear weapons are used for their traditional role in the pursuit of national security, where even their deployment is for the same purpose (Lee 1996, p.2). This brings out the question of moral authority over why they own them, as without these weapons there can still be peace and security in any given country including those that possess these weapons. As such, the justification for the possession of the weapons does not lie with the efficiency of military power or even national security, in which case the implications are that provided those in military leadership find the possession and use acceptable, then they should be kept. It is as a result of this that countries own these weapons of mass destruction to achieve their own ends, and these ends are not necessarily the ends of every citizen whom they lead because the weapons are the disposal of the military, at the command of the president and even military leaders (Paret 1986, p.762). In addition to this, there is the potential that these weapons are owned by some nations for the sole purpose of intimidation so as to protect overseas interests and assists as said by Caldicott (2004, p.73). In this case, he argues that there is no way that any country or military power would use nuclear weapons against its own citizens, and then he goes on to state that some countries have enormous oversees interests. As a result, the legitimacy for having these nuclear weapons is to protect the country from any external acts of aggression by other nations, just as the tradition of war goes. Besides this, the argument of having a peaceful world that is free of threats to national insecurity is a new justification to the possession of nuclear weapons owing to the presentation of new information in makers of new strategy. In this case, it is said that all wars since the inception of the nuclear weapons have been irrational and impossible due to the possibility of destroying the enemy finally (Lee 1996, p.12). From this perspective, justification is that nuclear weapons make the world a safe place by use of the theory of nuclear deterrence, where no nation dares wage war due to the possibility of obviation in the event of nuclear warfare. Therefore, war becomes outdated considering the nuclear arsenal available to the world in modern times and the countries that hold this arsenal are the ones that control the eventuality of war and ensure that the world is protected from itself and international feuds likely to explode into full-blown wars. In addition, there is the question of power, which can be brought up in reply to why some nations own nuclear weapons, which can directly point towards abuse. With this, nuclear power amongst the countries in possession of these arms is indicative of how they keep the world in check concerning the improved tactics of warfare across the world that are not restricted to guerrilla warfare, but go as far as air strikes with enhanced accuracy. This is especially so in modern times and based on recent events and history that goes as far back as the 1950s to show what possession of nuclear weapons has saved the world from destroying itself. Looking again at the abuse of power, the cold war can be used to show the consequences of having nuclear arms, and this does not paint a good picture at all for the world as a whole. In spite of claiming that nuclear weapons ring stability to the world, they also focus power on a few nations that then get into conflict as shown in the cold war of the 1980s. Consequently, the justification of nuclear wea ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Nuclear Weapons and Terrorism
The format that this essay will do is first highlight major issues and then provide some insight and explanations in order to clarify the direct risks associated with terrorists possessing nuclear weapons. One major concern for major policy makers is the idea that terrorists could build nuclear weapons.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Nuclear Technology vs Nuclear Weapons
This paper will attempt to answer the question of whether the concerns of the critics are founded. It will also try to show whether proponents are honest when they say that it is the safest and green energy to use. This report will also explore whether radioactive waste is a permanent problem or can it be solved.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Israel's Right to Nuclear Weapons
The author provides some examples in the history of anti-Semitism: the Great Jewish Revolt against the Roman Empire; the First Crusade which resulted in the massacre of Jews; the Inquisition led by Torquemada and the Auto de fé against the Marrano Jews; as well as expulsions from Spain, France, Germany, and other countries in which the Jews had settled.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Why do states want nuclear weapons
These included U.S, U.K, China, France and Russia. The scenario changed after 1998 when two non-signatories joined the club by declaring and testing nuclear weapons; the sub-continental neighbors, India and Pakistan. The case of Israel is different, although commonly believed to certainly posses nuclear weapons it refuses to deny or accept its nuclear capability.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The Spread Of Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear proliferation has two branches - horizontal and vertical. Vertical proliferation occurs within a state, when countries which are already nuclear powers add up more to their arsenal. While on the other hand, horizontal proliferation occurs when the use of nuclear weapons spreads from one nation to another.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Nuclear Weapons
Today, five nations – the U.S., United Kingdom, Russia, China and France – are officially recognised as possessing nuclear weapons. Pakistan and India have tested nuclear weapons and it is not known if Israel possesses nuclear weapon capability. Recently,
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The Ethical Use of Nuclear Weapons

The potential damages of nuclear weapons are so dreadful that it creates a deterring effect on different countries (Schelling, 4). This is an ethical use of nuclear weapons because it puts violence to an end. Wars are a part and parcel of human civilization but now nuclear weapons can help eradicate violent conflicts.

2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Nuclear weapons should be abolished
The loss witnessed by the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki proves this point. Nevertheless, the superpowers at the time went ahead to build an arsenal of nuclear capacity enough to destroy the world, which we refer as weapons of
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Iran's Nuclear weapons
It is clear that at the moment Iran doesn’t have the nuclear weaponry and estimates that it will up to ten years to have developed sufficient weapons to use. With this in mind therefore it becomes clear
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Nuclear Weapons
Since 1945, the world has been spared from the sight of cities being devastated by the nuclear explosions. The only existing memories of nuclear explosions are those that happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, this first generation of weapons which had an
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework
Let us find you another Essay on topic Nuclear weapons for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us