Land, Growth, and Justice: The Removal of the Cherokees Introduction “Discovering the American Past” was written by William Bruce Wheeler starring Susan D. Becker and Lorri Glover. In this paper, we are going to deal with chapter seven of the book which deals with land, growth and justice…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Land, Growth, and Justice: The Removal of the Cherokees"
Download file to see previous pages
There are various evidences that show why the Cherokees were not supposed to have been removed from their homeland.. The following are the Cherokees source; the removal of Cherokees from their original homeland by the army as directed by their commander (pg 176).After being removed from their homeland, they were forced to work as interpreters at a disclosed rate of $2.5 per day (p.176). A lot of force was used to remove the Cherokees Indians from homeland whereby General Winfield Scott directed his army to drive them towards another land which was to the west of Mississippi river. This therefore meant that they could not live their normal life full of freedom since they had to offer services as directed by the army. The Cherokees did not deserve to be removed from their land since a prison was built by the army commander for them to be locked up. (pg 176) This was totally injustice because the Cherokees were being imprisoned without making any mistake. All the hardworking men who were in the field, were used to be arrested on the spot and taken to the prison. The soldiers also dragged the women from their homes by use of excess force as they were being commanded by their army commander. The children were also separated from their parents and taken to stockades built buy the army. After the removal of the Cherokees from their lands by the soldiers, the whites used to celebrate as they took over their possessions. (pg176). This was unfair since the whites used to occupy the new homesteads without the consent of the actual owners. The Whites used to take their gold since the land was full of gold and all their belongings that they left behind as they forced their way towards. On their arrival at their new land, they faced stiff resistance among themselves whereby the first group to arrive could not tolerate the second group thus leading to war. Recent research shows that over four thousand Cherokees died either in the prison or as they were relocating to Oklahoma (p.177). These deaths could have been avoided if the Cherokees could have been allowed to stay in their homeland. The second source of the Cherokees source: In the mid-July of 1827 Cherokee people signed a constitution aided by the US government.(pg 179) The constitution signed by the Indians as a nation was based on the US constitution just to show respect and courtesy to Americans and to prove that Cherokee people were able to follow the rules and regulations of the country. The basic principles of the constitution gave every person equal rights, there was a Cherokee council in which members had to be of certain age and all other postulates resembled the US constitution. This was a good move by the Cherokee people to show goodwill for the Americans showing that they welcomed American culture and were ready to be ‘Modernized’. The members of the council were assigned the task to sign treaties with the US government to fix the issue of land. 1They called themselves as a nation but considered themselves to be bounded by the US law. In the year 1823, the Supreme Court gave a decision in favor of Cherokee that they were allowed to inhibit the US land but they would not own fully the title of the land. According to this law, the Cherokees were only regarded as the inhabitants or occupying that land which in reality belonged to the US government. Therefore the Indian Right of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In the view of the author, the Act was enforced in the United States mainly in order to provide sufficient land to white invaders, to ensure security against foreign invaders, and to foster Native American civilization. However, the Indian Removal Act 1830 evidently violated the US constitution as the Indians were removed from their land by force.
Greed of revenge, paternalism as well as fear contributed greatly as projected factors leading to removal. Dissenting arguments as well as divergent opinions both from United States and amongst Cherokee
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the Cherokees. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was an act of the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States on May 26, 1830 in order to empower President Andrew Jackson to direct the transfer of the five largest Indian tribes or the “Five Civilized Tribes” – the Choctaws, the Cherokees, the Seminoles, the Creeks, and the Chickasaws – from the Eastern States to the area west of the Mississippi River in order to allow white settlers to gain more access to the original Indian lands (“Indian Removal Act,” 2012).
Today people increasingly depend on mortgage loans to purchase land/properties and to build homes. In order to secure their credit, mortgage lenders include strict repossession terms in the mortgage deed. It is observed that some complex legal provisions like restrictive covenants adversely affect land/property deals because such rules limit buyers’ rights on the property.
These people are settled to the Indian Territory situation in Western United States that is now known as Oklahoma. During this force relocation massive deaths of people occurred and according to estimates around 4000 Cherokees were met to death in this harsh move (Perdue and Green, p121).
This democracy has shaped the development of the United States and the people outside the country throughout history until the present day. However, a critical aspect of American history that cannot be forgotten is the development of Indian-EuroAmerican relations, especially from the time of the first contact to the time of the removal of the Indians.
Today, being around in almost every part of the world, it can be said that each society has its own history of tattooing.
If a modern person today is asked for a reason on why he or she would want something permanently engraved on his or her skin, the probable answers would include something that is in relation to concepts like "coolness," "anger," "strength," "criminals," "soldiers," "navy," "vanity," or "fraternities" "fad." Others who knew a bit of history would associate tattoos with concepts such as "culture," "art," "tradition," "leadership," "stature," or maybe "strength."
What is required under the concept of economic justice is that everyone, regardless of his station in his life, should be assured of some minimum income. Justice and power are the concepts of political science. Where there is politics, power has to be there. Justice in some or the other circumstances is related to power.
Likewise, the Old Testament emphasizes occasions where God reached out to sinning nations and gave them extraordinary grace. For instance, the Ninevites were given a chance to repent in the book of Jonah, although