Land, Growth, and Justice: The Removal of the Cherokees - Essay Example

There are various evidences that show why the Cherokees were not supposed to have been removed from their homeland.. The following are the Cherokees source; the removal of Cherokees from their original homeland by the army as directed by their commander (pg 176).After being removed from their homeland, they were forced to work as interpreters at a disclosed rate of $2.5 per day (p.176). A lot of force was used to remove the Cherokees Indians from homeland whereby General Winfield Scott directed his army to drive them towards another land which was to the west of Mississippi river.

This therefore meant that they could not live their normal life full of freedom since they had to offer services as directed by the army. The Cherokees did not deserve to be removed from their land since a prison was built by the army commander for them to be locked up. (pg 176) This was totally injustice because the Cherokees were being imprisoned without making any mistake. All the hardworking men who were in the field, were used to be arrested on the spot and taken to the prison. The soldiers also dragged the women from their homes by use of excess force as they were being commanded by their army commander.

The children were also separated from their parents and taken to stockades built buy the army. After the removal of the Cherokees from their lands by the soldiers, the whites used to celebrate as they took over their possessions. (pg176). This was unfair since the whites used to occupy the new homesteads without the consent of the actual owners. The Whites used to take their gold since the land was full of gold and all their belongings that they left behind as they forced their way towards. On their arrival at their new land, they faced stiff resistance among themselves whereby the first group to arrive could not tolerate the second group thus leading to war.

Recent research shows that over four thousand Cherokees died either in the prison or as they were relocating to Oklahoma (p.177). These deaths could have been avoided if the Cherokees could have been allowed to stay in their homeland. The second source of the Cherokees source: In the mid-July of 1827 Cherokee people signed a constitution aided by the US government.(pg 179) The constitution signed by the Indians as a nation was based on the US constitution just to show respect and courtesy to Americans and to prove that Cherokee people were able to follow the rules and regulations of the country.

The basic principles of the constitution gave every person equal rights, there was a Cherokee council in which members had to be of certain age and all other postulates resembled the US constitution. This was a good move by the Cherokee people to show goodwill for the Americans showing that they welcomed American culture and were ready to be ‘Modernized’. The members of the council were assigned the task to sign treaties with the US government to fix the issue of land. 1They called themselves as a nation but considered themselves to be bounded by the US law.

In the year 1823, the Supreme Court gave a decision in favor of Cherokee that they were allowed to inhibit the US land but they would not own fully the title of the land. According to this law, the Cherokees were only regarded as the inhabitants or occupying that land which in reality belonged to the US government. Therefore the Indian Right of