Name Subject Date National Security Strategy Safety and prosperity of the American people are the greatest priorities at the dawn of 21st century when America faces a multitude of complex challenges with regards to national security. “Sustaining U.S Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense” (DSG) and “Chairman’s Strategic Direction to the Joint Force” (CSDJF) present the administration’s vision for the future to adapt to the current security environment…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The NSS 2010 U.S strategy seeks to build coalitions with strong international support and participation to address these issues. The NSS focuses on the security of the United States, its citizens and the US allies and partners. In addition to detecting threats posed by weapons of mass destruction specially deployed by fundamental extremists operating from within and outside the borders mentored by state or non state actors 1. The Quadrennial Defense Report (QDR) identifies the changing environment in which America will confront the challenges and threats of future. CSDFG identifies itself with National Military Strategy (NMS) with regards to the aims of the National Security Strategy (NSS) as it describes a strategic plan for the military force. 1. National Security Strategy. The white House, Washington May 2010 The strategies set forth in the DSG and CSDJF recognize the changes required for success in the new environment to meet the challenges and threats. Accomplishing both objectives will require stronger cooperation from our partners to deal with global challenges. Complementing the objectives in the NSS, the Defense Strategic Guidance (DSG) highlights the importance of transitioning forces to address the challenges of the future. The guidance explains the need for rebalancing the US military to meet the ends. The assessment broadly echoes the president’s strategic direction of transitioning defense forces from present war to get organized for the future challenges that would broadly address the national security concerns of the United States. Thus, the current transition, states the Chairman’s strategic direction for the joint force, is a selective and non-negotiable assimilation of capabilities to reconstitute the forces after the long period of war. Whereas the ways of achieving this fully equipped joint force are described precisely in the CSDJF. For example, the force will have a command over the cutting edge information technologies in networked special operations, including cyber, intelligence and reconnaissance to ensure much controlled and collaborative operations 2. On achieving the ends, CSDJF further explains that, “the implementation of these strategies will be a regionally-postured, but globally networked and flexible force. It can close on its objective at a time and place of its choosing and produce irreversible and stable outcomes. Finally, it is a joint force that provides a degree of security in balance with what the nation demands and is willing to pay” 3. Hence, the DSG and CSDJF, to a great extant, are elaborative on the same issues that the NSS points out as areas related to our national security. 2. Dempsey, E. Martin. Chairman’s Strategic Direction to the Joint Force Joint Chiefs of Staffs 3. Ibid While CSDFJ is guidance in tandem with the NSS and the QDR, it is very vague in advising military objectives. Thus, many issues are left for interpretation, whereas, National Military Strategy (NMS) specifically recognizes the ends to achieve with appropriate allocation and use of resources. Both documents, NSS and QDR, are intentionally vague to allow for planning. The NSS specifies the policy of United States towards security threats caused by cross
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This article explores the model through which population, technology and growth can be fitted to come up with a functional and economic legacy. With three regimes that have lived to characterize the economic development, it is essential that these steps be fairly understood. In a situation where the progress in technology is slow with a growing population, there is a likelihood of reduced rise in output growth.
The author states that unlike the Department of Defense, which tends to military actions overseas, the Department of Homeland Security focuses on the safety of United States civilians within, at, and outside of the country. The goal is to keep America as safe as possible, and to be prepared to defend it at a second’s notice.
According to the strategy, intelligence operations must be strengthened in order to counter the elusive, in-flux nature of terrorist activities (Part IX). Ultimately, the purpose of this intelligence expansion is for the government to make a swift response against and thereby neutralize the enemy before the actual threat even materializes.
While the Cold War posed the primary threat to international order in the latter half of the last century, failed states have emerged as perhaps the greatest threat to international stability. There are currently some forty-six states that are effectively failed or are failing.
Lacking a grand strategy, the United States is today seen by too many peoples of the world as a great power without purpose a giant that pronounces rather than listens and thus as a great danger.
Without understanding the impact of the four simultaneous revolutions globalization, information, and change in the nature of both sovereignty and conflict a search for national security is futile.
On the one hand, the main difference between these approaches was caused by political situations and foreign policies provided by Bill Clinton and George Bush. Clinton's defeat motivated him to adopt a more cautious, pragmatic, and moderate approach reflected the post-Cold war situation needed the policy of "engagement and enlargement".
In dealing with terrorists, the primary modes of America’s response must be pre-emption and more than proportionate retaliation. This policy is consistent with our National Security Strategy of 2010 as well as with the document of Homeland
This included terror attacks on American soil, a notable example being the September 11, 2001 attacks. Consequently, this resulted to numerous attacks against different terror groups. Therefore, in the
Also prominent in the strategy is the Euro-Atlantic security structures. The strategy acknowledges Russia as a powerful nation that has the role of overseeing the way global affairs are conducted as an influential centre in the contemporary world. The country perceives itself as a superpower that greatly influences international developments even as it seeks to protect its interests and the safety and rights of its citizens both within and without national borders2.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"National Security Strategy"
with a personal 20% discount.