The US and middle east - Essay Example

However, the Second World War was a wakeup call in all regions of the world as it fuelled nationalism, and this instigated calls for the Arab Nationalism. The Arabs felt that they had had enough of the British and the French who were colonising them. The Americans were not left out, and this is what led to the conflicts that exist to date between the United States and the Middle East. The writer of the article is addressing the Middle East by opening up some of the unseen agendas of the American - Middle East relationship.

The writer explains the origin of the relationship between the Middle East and the United States of America, the factors that led to the sharp conflict, democracy in the Middle East as well as the effects of the September 11 attacks on the American Middle East relationship. The author attempts to convince the audience and actually sets forth credible points to support his arguments. The writer is also at times harsh and objective in putting his points across such as arguing that the United States has a huge disregard for the Middle East in respect to human rights and democracy.

The writer is convincing as his sources are credible and has conducted an in-depth analysis to make us understand what the relationship is all about. In addition, the writer looks at the historical relationship and where it was as well as where the relationship is headed. He also looks at who are the major beneficiaries of the relationship, which is very persuading. Nevertheless, at some instances the arguments are out of line; for instance, the claim that the United States does not care for the Middle East and for a very long time the relationship has been based on how they could acquire oil by fuelling conflict without making up for it.

Ethos, Pathos and Logos are the modes of persuasion that are used in argumentative essays. The writer uses Logos, which is a persuasion technique that embraces the use of logic or logical arguments. He uses deductive and inductive reasoning, which helps make the argument credible. The writer also uses pathos, which is meant to appeal to the reader’s emotion, as well as ethos, which is meant to convince the reader that the writer is an expert in the field he is writing about. The Ethos the writer uses in the paper includes quoting credible sources such as Colin L.

Powell, who is the former United States secretary of state; he also states his credentials as a scholar in the Middle East affairs, and hence the information he is presenting is credible. Reading through the essay, one is able to extract much information, e.g. the US policy on IRAQ, the US strategy on the Arab World as well as the relations between the US and Qatar, which for the a long time could be described as strained and problematic. The ethos can be defined by a quote by Powell (2004), who was defending the US policy in the Middle East: “The United States’ National Security Strategy does commit us to preemption under certain limited circumstances” (as quoted in Shunnag, p. 833) Finally, the other instance when the author resorts to Ethos in the paper is when he provides credible evidence and information about the US policy in Iraq and relations with Qatar as well as the strategy of the United States in the Middle East.

Those are among the sharp areas of focus that he uses to persuade the reader. In this case