The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) developed by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith’s (1993) and the Institutional Rational Choice theory formulated by Ostrom (1990, 1999) are two theories that are discussed by Birkland (298, 302). These theories provide comprehensive frame works to understand policy change (Birkland, 298, 302-319)…
Download file to see previous pages...
The strength of this framework lies in that it takes into consideration, all the actors at play, and their mutual dynamics, in a given policy situation. The shortcomings in the prevailing, stages heuristic theory, the problems with both “top-down and bottom-up approaches”, and the lacunae in the existing theories with respect to “scientific and technical information” had prompted the birth of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (Weible, Sabatier and McQueen, 122). This theory has looked at policy change as an attribute of several factors, namely, science and technology, time span, “policy subsystems”, and individual “beliefs” (Weible, Sabatier and McQueen, 122). It is the collective action of different advocacy groups that form into a temporary coalition on a specific issue (even if these groups differ among them on other issues) that is projected as a catalyst for policy change, according to this theory (Birkland, 300). Both the subsystem events and changes in the external policy environment have been viewed by this framework as to cause policy change (Weible, Sabatier and McQueen, 123-4). ...
The basic notion of this theory has been that “individuals- acting alone, or within organizations- are utility-maximizing, rational individuals who are goal-oriented and use near-perfect information to weigh a range of options before adopting the optimal choice based on their calculation of costs and benefits” (Birkland, 302). This is a rule-based framework (where rules are implicit rather than binding), where policy changes are determined by “encompassing efficiency, equity, accountability, “conformance to general morality”, (…), and adaptability” (Birkland, 304). From this theoretical perspective, the actors who bring about policy change are acting either “as individuals or as groups functioning as a corporate actor” (Warne, 20). This theory has also envisaged a three tier process of policy creation/change, the tiers being, “operational tier (…) collective tier (…) (and) constitutional tier” (Warne, 20-21). My personal experiences and understanding of public policy suggest that the Advocacy Coalition Framework has succeeded in identifying the wider and specific aspects of policy making and integrating them beautifully, but it has failed to notice that all negotiations can happen only within the given legal and moral realm. On the other hand, the theory of Institutional Rational Choice has stressed the universal aspect of a policy choice. It has been successful in incorporating the coalition element of the Advocacy Coalition Framework, as one among its three tier model and has thus went beyond the Advocacy Coalition Framework to put forth a more comprehensive theoretical model. But all the same, the Institutional
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Public Policy Analysis Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1457680-public-policy-analysis
(Public Policy Analysis Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Public Policy Analysis Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1457680-public-policy-analysis.
Thus a traffic problem can be defined as any hindrance that affects the policy that guides road traffic regulations. Every road traffic problem has a nature and until the nature of the problem is identified, it possess a much bigger problem that it seems.
The Government of Oman via the aid of its policy makers have been battling and debating on the right policies that will help in curbing this misnomer. The rising death tool due to motor vehicle accidents in Oman has reached an alarming crescendo and the Government and policy formulation makers have developed and proposed certain policies and or penalties in a bid to put an effeminate stop to this unwholesome saga.
I shall be referring to the Emergency Medical Conditions and Women in Labor legislation, in the manner as to what policy would need to be introduced. These options are emphasized in order to bring about a health system which leads towards a more efficient and
The Act in a nutshell creates a Public Accounting Oversight Board to impose on the accounting profession certain professional standards, ethics and thereby ensure competence. Independence of the auditing companies engaged in auditing of public companies is strengthened
The bill holds quite a significance since it has changed the course of healthcare in the US following Medicare and the Medicaid bills. The Obamacare bill is aimed at enacting the goal of enhancing quality as well as
Therefore, the use of discounting technique that facilitates effective evaluation of costs and benefits that occurs at different times is essential for the government. Discounting method is rationally viable for the government since it provides clear benchmarks and
The debate has been that the use of marijuana does not pose any significant risk to the health and life of the general public. According to Pew Research Center in a survey by the U.S. government, showed that 18.9 million
There are a number of criteria used to analyze public policies proposals (Araral et al. 263). These criteria include the efficiency of the policy proposal, the effectiveness, equity, social acceptability, liberty,