Honor Killing by Stoning Innocent yet Inconvenient - Essay Example

The nature of the crime seems to have involved a lot of ideologies. Soraya Manutchehri, who was thirty five years of age by then, happened to have been the victim talked about in this case. Not to forget is that she was also a mother of seven. She was considered an “inconvenient wife” due to her own prophetic words (Sahebjam, 2011). This came about after she was forced into a marriage at a tender age of thirteen and was left with no choice but to get married to a trivial criminal by the name Ghorban –Ali.

Soraya who got married to a twenty year old man, managed to bear nine children despite the kind of tribulations she went through (Ebert, 2011). Her husband being a criminal did all sorts of evil things that made her life uncomfortable but still made no move fore she had no powers having been forced by some external powers or ideologies that she could not run away from (Muchelemba, 2003). In the lawless days of the Iranian revolution, Sorayas husband found a fourteen year old girl who he was planning to marry having met her in a town where he was employed as a prison guard (Sahebjam, 1994).

Being that polygamy was encouraged in Ayatolla Khomeini’s Iran, Ghorban had to find ways of divorcing her first wife Soraya as he was tired of her (Saigeon & Sapergia, 2009). Divorce was also allowed but Ghorban did not want to return Soraya’s dowry (Saigeon, 2011). Due to this, he was left with no other alternative but to accuse Soraya of infidelity. The accusation was backed by Ghorban’s cousin even though he did not have any evidence to support his back up (Green, 1920). Soraya after the accusations was convicted by the “sharia” court and had to serve a death sentence by stoning (Green, 1920).

The village or nation did not practice freedom of speech especially to the feminine. Existence of freedom of speech could have helped Soraya out of the mess. The idea of free speech is one of the most controversial issues in liberal societies and in case the liberty to express oneself is not greatly valued, as has been the case in most states, there is no problem since freedom of expression is merely condensed in errand of other values. When free speech is valued extremely it becomes a variable issue due to the fact that it is only at this point when the precincts placed upon freedom of speech become contentious.

The right to free speech is one of the dearest rights an individual has as a citizen of the United States of America and is also practiced in other continents including Africa. Liberty to speech is a human right that provides people with a chance to express their feelings and opinions of what they think that it should take place. Throughout history such rights have been questioned and exercised, and have produced extremely positive things in a number of cases. The questioning of these rights is not isolated to one era of time; they have been questioned several times in the history of man and in dissimilar manner.

Currently, individuals have been going on rampage on the roads and streets usually complaining about the right to speech and this was the case even in the colonial era hence it is very important to put into mind individuals wished that their voice should be heard and so long as it is carried out in a diplomatic mode it became lawful, though it led to colonialists’ punishment. It is true that people have never queried whether or not these rights