Name: Topic: Political cultures of Canada and the United States There is a lot of similarity between the US and Canada, in various fronts. They both happen to share a common language, their systems of public sector governing alike and most interestingly, their political cultures seem alike…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Political Cultures of Canada and the United States"
Download file to see previous pages
However, there has been observed a tendency of the change of attitude on this perspective by the Canadians, becoming increasingly detached to their government, fading their support for the custom political parties, in favor of new ones with new ideologies. This raises the concern as to whether the Canadian people are becoming Americanized. This issue creates different opinions from scholars, with Paul Nesbitt-Larking supporting this viewpoint while Michael Adams sees it in the contrary, citing the support for government action and universal health policy as a characteristic of Canada only. According to Paul, there has been a lot of American influence on the Canadian domestic and foreign affairs, in an attempt to have Canada annexed to the US. Although Canada is the greatest trading partner to the US, the US does not seem to recognize this, attributing this status to Japan (Nesbitt-Larking 3).The US does not seem to appreciate the monarchial system of the Canadian government, always attacking it through diplomacy. Described as ‘Elephantine,’ the influence of the US on Canada is apparent in various fronts. From the economy, where the US dominates the Canadian economy, having the most profitable organizations in Canada owned by the Americans to the entertainment, military and political institutions which almost replicate those of the US (Nesbitt-Larking 4). Though Canada has for long greatly struggled to maintain its ‘communitarianism’ ideology, it has been greatly affected by the ‘Individualism’ ideology of the US to the extent of perceiving the US political culture as the most perfect. Thus, according to Paul, Canada is constantly struggling between adopting the US possessive individualism and the European collective and conservative communitarianism. This spirit of Americanization is observed to have crept into the minds of the Canadians who even think it wise to have a re-union of both countries. The advocates of such opinions are those who perceive the American spirit of entrepreneurship and individualism as the perfect spirit to embrace. Therefore, according to Paul, Americanization of the Canadians is slowly taking shape, and it might eventually turn rife and change the completely Canadian culture both economic and socio-political into the American one. The continued growth in popularity of the US political culture and the spirit of individualism is likely to cause a fading of the traditional political cultures of Canada and eventually have the new ideology adopted and the old political culture, systems and institutions done away with. This is what Paul refers to as the “danger of Americanization.’ Whether this occurs is dependent on the Canadian people’s ability to resist this cultural transformation, an aspect that has been there for long enough (Nesbitt-Larking 9). It is argued that the Canadian political parties and leaders have been propagating the individualism spirit and ideology over the past two decades. This can been through the advocacy of the free market systems (Nesbitt-Larking 11). Through the fiscal and monetary policies, these leaders reduced the size of the public sector, through cuts to the sector and the provinces in terms of funding. The policies created unemployment and leaned the middle class earnings, through taxation. All this was meant to reduce the importance of the public sector and promote the spirit of ind
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Due to the fact that the country is essentially divided into two political camps, the public, as can be seen in the election results or voter preferences, is not very fragmented. However, the two-party system has also resulted in sharp divisions among the populace.
Issues concerning immigration continue to be at the center of a great deal of ethical, social, and political debate. The United States is not the only country that struggles with the finding of the best possible policies to be applied to the immigrant populations within the country.
What is possibly more amazing is the reality that a broad range of neo-Marxism inputs to the country’s political economy rationally perceives of their contribution as the reasonable zenith of the already understood multiculturalism nature of the society.
In a research study to analyze the similarities and the differences in structures within the United States as well as the federal republic of Switzerland, it is therefore necessary to understand the structural frameworks that govern the two countries and their historical evolution into the status that they are in today.
Compare and Contrast the Cultures of the United States and Saudi Arabia
Societies around the whole world have major differences while they also exhibit similarities in some aspects. These differences in societies are usually a result of religious convictions, customs and traditions, economic and technological development, and most importantly the values a particular society attach to the general freedom.
News in the United States Political System
Newspapers, journals, radio, television, and now the Internet, have all made quantum leaps in the capabilities of people to stay informed, and to form opinions as well.
The United States, both as a democracy and as a dominant economic power, leads the world in freedoms of information and expression.
The question οf the proper role οf religion and οf religiously based moral convictions within American public life has been hotly debated during the past fifteen years. The rise οf the Moral Majority immediately prior to the first Reagan presidential campaign and the presidential candidacies οf ordained ministers Pat Robertson and Jesse Jackson directed the media spotlight to the issue οf religion and politics.
The critics of free market healthcare will point out the disparities in treatment between the rich and the poor. However, socialized healthcare would reduce the level of treatment for everyone. Both rich and poor would have sub standard treatment with socialized healthcare. Critics believe that the 40 million uninsureds would suddenly have access to healthcare.
Organizational cultures are embedded in and constructed by the prevalent national cultures. The U.S., United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia management systems are quite different owing to their differential cultural
te those beliefs and practices of the people of a cultural community since the scope of traditional cultural art is, to a great extent, restrained by the societal power factors, such as the state authority, various social organizations, and established dissident groups. Unlike
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Political Cultures of Canada and the United States"
with a personal 20% discount.