StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
 This essay focuses on an intention of questioning the Constitution of America through various lenses. This essay is going to shed some light on Federalist No. 69 and compare his executive branch with that under the Articles of Confederation which were perceived as producing a weak government…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.1% of users find it useful
Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch"

Download file to see previous pages A government consists of three branches; the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial. The President of America has the right to revisit a bill, which undergoes two of the branches and forms into a law if approved by two-thirds of the people from both houses. On the contrary, the King of Britain has “an absolute negative” regarding approval from the houses. This naturally means agitation both from the Parliament and the public before a law is implemented rather by play than force. This authority is only invested in the King and not the President. Then Hamilton states four concrete points of difference between the King and the President: 1. The President has the authority to command the militia occasionally unlike the King of Great Britain and the governor of New York, who can command the whole militia at all times remaining in their numerous jurisdictions. Hence the power of the President is second-rate as compared to the other two. 2.  It is the duty of the President to be commander-in-chief of the United States’ army and navy. This article brings the President on equal grounds with the King and the governor, however lesser in substance. The President cannot declare war or regulate fleets and armies. Only the legislature has this authority. 3. The President can pardon call cases except for the impeachment case. This is not the case with the governor of New York who can even deal with the impeachment cases except for assassination and treachery. This is aggressively questioned by Hamilton for its undeserving distribution of power vested in the President. 4. The King of Great Britain and the governor of New York respectively have the influence to disband the Parliament or the legislature of the State which may be a purposeful control employed by the governor in certain delicate matters. The President, however, remains at the level of just adjourning only the national legislature under a single case of disagreement circumstance (Hamilton, 1992). These differences have been pointed out to display the real character of the executive, the President of the United States, who may not be compared to the King of Great Britain, not even the governor of New York. In reality, the U.S. Constitutions only recently gained power as the American Legislators made a conscious effort to regain the executive branch through the trust of the people. The President is the magistrate elected by the people of the United States. He is not completely independent because he is chosen for four years through fair elections (Tocqueville, 1945). The power as it is seen in the constitution did not exist prior to the introduction to the Constitutions of the United States. The people lived under the Articles of Confederation, which did not have an executive branch and it lasted for forty years (Prince, 1867). It was considered weak without the executive branch.   ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch Essay”, n.d.)
Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1442211-federalist-no
(Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch Essay)
Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1442211-federalist-no.
“Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1442211-federalist-no.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch

The executive branch of state government

...The executive branch of state government Introduction The United State administration constituted of the three government branches which entail the legislative branch for law making, executive branch for law enforcement and the judiciary that decides appearing cased under the law. Each of these branches has unique roles towards the making and enforcement of the regulatory process. Discussion Executive The department comprises of the state leader, his assistant president and cabinets. The cabinet of the US comprise of about fifteen levels. These levels of division depend on the role played by each of the department. The US president has authority over this sector and he is in charge of selecting the assistant president as well... ,...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

The Executive Branch of the Russian Federation

...s The Executive Branch of the Russian Federation Summary This Assignment is correlated with the information about the political system of the Russian federation. It includes a thorough illustration of the Russian Federation’s Government, members of the Russian Executive branch, through which process they are being selected or elected and what are their responsibilities. Furthermore this assignment leads to know that how the presidential power that have been increased since last decade or more is affecting the whole Russian Federation. It is an attempt to discuss the critical and dramatic relationship of the two main characters of the Russian politics that have been...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Federalist vs Anti- federalist

... Question one. The views of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists on the role of the representatives derive from the ways in which each see therole of the federal, or central, government. The Federalists believed in a strong central government and they thought that it would protect the rights of individual citizens. In contrast, the Anti-federalists did not trust a strong central government and favored more the concept of "little republics" or states, each with their laws establishing their own authority to protect citizen rights and exercise power of government. Each of these positions had good and strong reasoning, as represented by James Madison in Federalist Letter #10 and the debating response by the writer 'Brutus'. Today... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework

Anti-federalist

...? (Assignment) Anti-federalists The anti-federalists who opposed the ratification of US constitution (1987) includedfarmers, tradesmen and other individuals notably from non wealthy segments. Patrick Henry and George Mason constituted some of the prominent personalities of anti-federalist group. The local politicians who feared of losing their power also joined the anti-federalists. “The arguments of anti-federalists relied on rhetoric of revolutionary war era which stressed on virtues of local rule and associated centralized power with a tyrannical monarch” (Constitution of the United Status-Federalists versus...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances between the Executive and Judicial Branch

...? The balance of powers between Congress (House and Senate), the President and the Judiciary, is one of the cornerstones of the US system of government. By 'balance', it is implied that providing each a certain amount of power, no single element can act with impunity and authority in a way that challenges the principles of a democratic union. This paper will examine the principals and the practice of the balance of powers, with a particular eye to Executive versus the Judicial branch. The notion of factionalism will be provided as the background for the balance of powers, followed by a brief overview of how these powers are defined, and then, an analysis of the Executive versus the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

Federalist Papers

...and their influence in the society and political activity could be controlled through the creation of a larger republic managed through representative democracy. Federalist#51 Federalist 51 is another important essay in the series of Federalist Papers outlining the need to have a proper check and balance system. Further it also outlines the need for separation of power in the government. Outlining the overall purpose of the paper, Madison argued that by creating separate branches of the government, the overall rights of the people can be safeguarded. By advocating less dependency of each member of different departments, it can be ensured that the overall influence of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Federalist and anti Federalist debates

..., allocation of powers to executive, legislative and judiciary, and especially the influence each state can contribute in the central government. A famous and insightful Anti-Federalist named Robert Yates, delegate to Constitutional Convention and a New York judge, withdrew in the Convention saying that it was exceeding its powers and instructions and the Supreme Court would soon become a source of over-reaching and unlimited federal powers (Galles, 2006). References: Galles, Gary. The Anti-Federalists Were Right, (2006). Web. 18 September 2011. Føllesdal, Andreas. "Federalism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Web. 18 September...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Forum on Executive Branch

...Andrew Jackson’s Seventh Annual Message Andrew Jackson’s Seventh Annual Message Andrew Jackson’s seventh annual message to the congress portrays his uncompromising and strong opinionated personality which is clearly reflected in this speech. The most significant thing to notice is that President Jackson makes no direct reference to the Indian Removal in this particular speech; however, the reference is implicitly made only when he talks about the sale of public lands most of which are Indian territories. He seems to defend the Indian Removal act by listing the advantages to the Americans as well as Native Americans. The use of language makes his policies sound voluntary and convinces the listener that they certainly will allow... Jackson’s...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Presidency/ executive branch revisited

...Essay, History and Political Science Topic: Presidency/ executive branch revisited The Editor, BRANDING IRON Dear Editor, I have learned something very interesting in my political science class and I think everyone should know about it. It relates to the executive powers of the American President. The American President is a twice-blessed individual. Firstly, he has specified legal powers under the Constitution as for his duties and responsibilities. Secondly his executive powers during the period of National crisis are awesome. His powers grow like octopus that grows in all the directions. At that level he is the most powerful individual of the most powerful...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Polycarp (ca,69-155)

...embraces something that is given. He did not resist, nor did he display any change in his state into agitation, or any such outward signs of distress. The discussions with the authorities and his refusal to renounce his faith constitute the key part of the letter, from the vantage point of the theological message of Polycarp. Another key message here too, is not that martyrdom was something to be desired in itself, but that the main thing is to follow the will of god and to be steadfast in ones witnessing of Jesus Christ, because as the text says there is no comparison between the fleeting moment of ones persecution and execution on this earth on the one hand and the promise of eternity and life with Jesus that is the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Federalist No. 69 and the Executive Branch for FREE!

Contact Us