U.S. Foreign Policy and Trade In this work, we examine how United States foreign policy impacts on U.S. trade relations. How do the objectives of U.S. foreign policy affect U.S. trade relations with Latin America?…
Download file to see previous pages...
Overview A country’s trade policy unavoidably implements a country’s foreign policy. This is because, at minimum, international trade reflects state recognition. This fact alone circumscribes foreign trade policy under a country’s overall foreign policy. In international trade, goods and services are exchanged. Conventional economic theories on international trade say that international trade promotes development and development in turn promotes equity consistent with Kuznets’s inverted U hypothesis (Todaro and Smith, 212). The choice of trade partners always implies a choice what countries the U.S. wants to have accelerated development. At the same time, trade has its own dynamics. The World Trade Organization, for example, was established precisely to depoliticize trade and make trade subject to multilateral rules rather than beholden to the unilateral rules of powerful nations. Although U.S. foreign trade policy will always be an extension of her overall foreign policy, international trade has its own dynamics and can influence or even subvert U.S. foreign policy. This means, for example that US influence can decrease as multilateral trade organizations assert their collective decisions even if the original intent of U.S. foreign policy is for the U.S. to increase its influence through the promotion of the policy. U.S. Foreign Policy and Trade with Latin America Latin America is the “largest supplier of foreign oil to the United States and a strong partner in the development of alternative fuels” (Barshefsky et al., xi). The country is also “the biggest supplier of illegal drugs” into the United States (Barshefsky et al., xi). Moreover, “Latin America is also the largest source of U.S. immigrants, both documented and not” (Barshefsky et al., xi). Thirty percent of U.S. oil imports come from Latin America compared to only 20 percent from the Middle East (Barshefsky et al., 6). Latinos constitute about 15% of the U.S. population (Barshefsky et al. 6). For the said reasons, Latin America is extremely important for the U.S. as well as a significant source of problems. It is important for America to influence Latin America but Barshefsky and colleagues emphasized that “the era of the United States as the dominant influence in Latin America is over” (xi). Latin American regard for U.S. “global and hemispheric leadership is at its lowest level” (Barshefsky et al., 7). This is shown by data: Latin Americans who favor U.S. political ideas were only 29 percent in 2007 compared to a high 45 percent several years ago in 2002 (Barshefsky et al., 7). The Monroe Doctrine provided the guiding principle for U.S. policy on Latin America for more than 150 years (Barshefsky et al., 5). The Monroe Doctrine asserts U.S. power in Latin America but U.S. policy for Latin America can no longer work under that assumption in view of changes in the political situation, particularly with regard to U.S. dominance over the region (Barshefsky et al., 5). Barshefsky and colleagues pointed out that “if there was an era of U.S. hegemony in Latin America, it is over” (5). During the years in which the U.S. enjoyed hegemony in Latin America, particularly from 1996 to 2006, “total merchandise trade in Latin America grew by 139 percent, compared to 96 percent for Asia and 95 percent for the European Union (EU)” (Barshefsky et al., 6). During the 1980s, as the Cold War started to subside, U.S. policy in Latin America moved from “
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Classical trade theories involve inquiring into and identifying explanations for a trade patterns, trade policies and the “welfare consequences of various trade policy instruments”. David Ricardo, a 19th century economist developed the theory of comparative advantage which is a basic trade theory that informs and explains trade patterns indicative of liberalization.
This expansion was also meant to empower its competition with the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union, countries which were, at that time, considered to be more influential and more financially stable nations than the US.
This paper is a similar attempt to analyze one of the major stakeholders of US foreign policy: public. In particular, the paper includes discussion and analysis of the perspective as whether public opinion matters in the decision-making process of US foreign policy or not.
Historically, Colombia foreign policy has allied itself to countries that differ ideologically with the United States such as Cuba. Randall (143) argues that such associations are motivated by strategic goals, especially diversifying and expanding its trade rather than ideological interests.
After the 9/11 New York terrorist attacks, the US government made a resolve, in 2001, on going to war with the terrorists group linked to the attacks in an attempt to eliminate terrorism and secure her borders from future terror threat. The tenth amendment on the US constitution permits the government to use force.
The author states that many contemporary scholars have tried to explain how international affairs are conducted and what foreign policies should be concerned with, but their views are very divergent and a policy maker has to decide the guiding theory or view. Three main competing paradigms: realism, liberalism and constructivism have different strands.
The investigator examines the foreign policy of China. It should be noted that China is still a one-party state ruled by the communist party. Besides, China has a “new political ideology” in former President Jiang Zemin's ‘Three Represents theory’, which is now starting to catch on with the Chinese masses after almost three years of nonstop official propaganda.
While much analysis has been made on the US Security policy in Middle Eastern terrorism, scant attention has been given to its policy with regard to Latin America.
The BBC, the world's largest broadcasting corporation, ran a series on Latin America early this year.
U.S. drug and immigration control strategies focus primordially on curbing the foreign supply and secondarily on identifying the sources of demand: consumers of drugs and employers of migrant workers. In a nutshell, US efforts have confronted the demand side of the problem--America's inherent dependence on both.
To improve the bilateral relationship and security, the ROC and the U.S. signed the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty in 1954. The economic aids from U.S. helped Taiwan to improve its economy and remained as a member of United Nation and also other major
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic U.S. Foreign Policy and Trade for FREE!