StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons" discusses that during the Yalta conference of February 1945, Stalin had agreed to join the war with Japan at the insistence of the USA and Britain. Stalin’s intention however has been to establish Soviet domination in the Asian region…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons"

?Soviet Union’s Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons and how it Overcame the Obstacles to Acquire Nuclear Weapons The second country to develop nuclear weapons after the US was the Soviet Union. Although they were allies during the Second World War, that was only temporary alliance. The use of nuclear weapons by the US at the end of the second world war and the fact that they kept it as a secret from the Soviet Union has created a fear for Soviet leadership that they might use it for dominating them (Krieger, 2005). The decision to make nuclear weapons was a political decision of Stalin. He made the decision in the same year the Second World War ended (Reed, 2010). It took only four years for Soviet Union to become nuclear. The first nuclear weapon that they fired was a copy of the bomb dropped in Nagasaki by the US. It added to their prestige and deterrent potential. The Soviet effort to develop nuclear weapon was led by Igor Kurchatov at a secret site known as Arzamas-16 (Cold War: A Brief History, 2011). They were helped by spies inside the Manhattan project, most notably by Klaus Fuchs. Fuchs had German origin, but took British citizenship and was send to US to work on the atom bomb. He passed detailed information on the project to the Soviet Union through a courier in 1945 (Klaus Fuchs , 2011). Using the detailed description made by Klaus Fuchs, Soviets constructed a similar copy of the Fat Man bomb (Cold War: A Brief History). It was tested at the Semipalatinsk Test Site in Kazakhstan on August 29, 1949 and its estimated yield was about 22 kilotons (Cold War: A Brief History). He also passed information regarding hydrogen bomb in 1946 an 1947, but that were not very useful. Reports of the unusual explosive force of the atomic bomb appeared in Soviet press for the first time in Pravda on 13th October 1941. Medvedev (n.d.) points out that the release of a spontaneous chain reaction by the fission of uranium-235, which had been done in 1938 in Germany by Otto Hahn, and by Frederic Joliet-Curie in France, was independently discovered by the young Soviet physicists Georgy Flerov in Leningrad and Yulii Khariton in Moscow in 1939. In the United States, the possibility of developing atomic bomb was discussed in the press in 1940. Flerov believed that research was taking place in Germany and the US in the field of uranium fission. He sent a letter to Stalin saying that nothing is being published about the nuclear program and there is something suspicious (Soviet Atomic Bomb Project, 2011). In that letter, he wrote, “we must build uranium bomb without delay (Thomas B. Cochran, 1995)”. Intelligence officials of Moscow had definite information about this. In the Soviet system during that period, only Stalin got all secret intelligence information. Medvedev argues that the intelligence communications about the atom bomb were also seen and considered firstly by Stalin. In 1942, the Soviet secret service received information from Cairncross, Fuchs and Pontecorvo. They were diehard communists. Klaus Fuchs was a physicist and atomic scientist who left Germany in 1933. John Cairncross was the secretary of Lord Hankey, one of the war ministers of the War Cabinet. Bruno Pontecorvo, was an Italian emigre and close collaborator of the famous Enrico Fermi, who, in 1942, was the first person in the world to construct a nuclear reactor (Medvedev). They send information as goodwill and on their own initiative. Much of the information passed by them was scientific in nature and only a physicist could understand them. In May-June 1942, Kaftanov reported on a letter addressed to Stalin from the physicist Flerov, who explained in a much clearer way what the atomic bomb represented, and why Germany or the USA could possess this bomb in the not too distant future (Medvedev). On hearing Kaftanov’s report, Stalin walked about a little in his Kremlin office, thought, and said ‘it is necessary to act’ (Medvedev). By this time, the intelligence departments have gathered 2000 pages of technical information regarding atomic bomb. A leader was required to conduct the nuclear program. The leader has to be familiar with intelligence departments also, because they had the information. In the autumn of 1942, several scientists were called to Moscow for consultation. But none of them were members of communist party. Amongst the academicians, the most senior were Abram Joffe, Vitali Khlopin and Pyotr Kapitsa (Medvedev). They were not very much interested in the bomb program. Young atomic scientists, Georgy Nikolayevich Flerov, Igor Vasilevich Kurchatov, Izaak Konstantinovich Kikoin, Abram Izaakovich Alikhanov and Yulii Borisovich Khariton were also called separately for consultations in Moscow that autumn. In February 1943, Stalin finally signed the decision of the State Committee of Defence (GKO) on the beginning of a programme of work in the Soviet Union to build the atomic bomb. The general responsibility of the task was entrusted to GKO vice-chairman V.M. Molotov (Medvedev). He approached several academicians to take the leadership of the project. Kurchatov showed some willingness and Molotov introduced him to secret documents and secret agents and presented him to Stalin. On 10th March 1943, Stalin signed the decision of the State Committee of Defence of the USSR on the appointment of Igor Kurchatov to the newly established post of scientific leader of work on the use of atomic energy in the USSR (Medvedev). He was also appointed as the director of the newly established scientific institute of atomic energy. Intelligence agencies provided information regarding developments in USA and how close it was to developing atomic bomb. But Soviet Union could not progress much in this regard as there was no uranium in the country. Search for uranium expanded. Professor Nikolaus Riehl, the main German expert on the production of pure uranium metal, at this time, freely agreed to meet Soviet people. He led Soviet scientists to Oranienburg, a town to the north of Berlin, where the main factory in Germany for the production of pure uranium for reactors was situated. The factory, however, had been completely destroyed by American bombers over some days before the end of the war (Medvedev). The damaged remains of the factory’s equipment were dismantled and taken to the Soviet Union. In July, the German team of Nikolaus Riehl began transforming the ‘Electrostal’ factory in the Noginsky district of Moscow into a uranium factory (Medvedev). By 1945, pure uranium was developed and the uranium-graphite experimental reactor commenced in January 1946. It was prisoners who worked in this factory. In 1950, the production of pure uranium reached one tonne a day. (Medvedev). The United States tested the first atomic bomb in the State of New Mexico on 16th July 1945 and Stalin got the information on 20 or 21 July. On July 24, President Truman told Stalin and Molotov that USA had a new highly explosive weapon. Within two weeks atom bombs were used in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. During the Yalta conference of February 1945, Stalin had agreed to join war with Japan at the insistence of USA and Britain. Stalin’s intention however has been to establish Soviet domination in the Asian region. Fuchs and Pontekorvo meanwhile reported that the production of uranium 235 and plutonium in the USA permitted the preparation of eight atomic bombs per month (Medvedev). In these new circumstances the atomic project became, for Stalin, the absolute priority (Medvedev). On August 20, 1945, Stalin signed GKO Decision No.9887. It established a new structure for the atomic project. The State Defence Committee established a ‘Special Committee’ with exceptional powers and Beria was appointed as the chairman. By the end of 1945, fifty thousand people were working for the project. Most of them were prisoners. By 1950, 700,000 were working on the nuclear project. By the middle of 1948, the nuclear reactor became operational. The successful testing of the first Soviet atomic bomb took place at a specially constructed testing range in the Semipalatinsk region of Kazakhstan on 29 August 1949 (Medvedev). Stalin honoured the persons who helped the nuclear project. The scientists Kurchatov, Flerov, Khariton, Shchelkin, and Dollezhal received the highest award – the title of Hero of Socialist Labour and the Gold Star medal (Medvedev). The German Professor Nikolaus Riehl also received the Gold Star and the title of Hero. Works Cited Cold War: A Brief History. (2011). Retrieved March 9, 2011, from Atomic Archive: http://www.atomicarchive.com/History/coldwar/page03.shtml Klaus Fuchs (1911 - 1988). (2011). Retrieved March 9, 2011, from Atomic Archive .com: http://www.atomicarchive.com/Bios/Fuchs.shtml Krieger, D. (2005, Novemebr). Why Nations Go Nuclear. Retrieved May 9, 2011, from Nuclear Age Peace Foundation: http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2005/11/00_krieger-why-nations-go-nuclear.htm Medvedev, Z. A. (n.d.). Stalin and the Atomic Bomb. Retrieved March 9, 2011, from http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/medvedev.pdf Reed, T. C. (2010, November 19). A Political History of Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved March 9, 2010 Soviet Atomic Bomb Project. (2011). Retrieved March 10, 2011, from WorldLingo: http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Soviet_atomic_bomb_project Thomas B. Cochran, R. S. (1995). Making the Russian Bomb from Stalin to Yeltsin. Retrieved March 10, 2011, from Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.: http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/files/nuc_01019501a_138.pdf Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons and how it Overcame Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1411059-soviet-unions-decision-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons-and-how-it-overcame-the-obstacles-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons
(Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons and How It Overcame Essay)
https://studentshare.org/history/1411059-soviet-unions-decision-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons-and-how-it-overcame-the-obstacles-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons.
“Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons and How It Overcame Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1411059-soviet-unions-decision-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons-and-how-it-overcame-the-obstacles-to-acquire-nuclear-weapons.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Soviet Unions Decision to Acquire Nuclear Weapons

Did the West Really Win the Cold War

This paper has agreed with scholars who argue that the soviet Union was coming close to a technological and economic decline by the 1980s and that sustaining the strength of its military and global aspirations was critically straining its limited resources.... Post hoc is not necessarily proper hot, but there is a prima facie case that the Western leaders forced the soviet leadership to confront internal weaknesses and narrowed the options open to them.... The Reagan administration, when it came to power, openly proclaimed it was altering the rules of the game with the soviet Union after a decade of detente (ibid, p....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Nuclear Weapon and Cold War

Critic of nuclear proliferation argued that nuclear weapons endanger the existence of international peace and the welfare of the world.... On the other hand, supporters of nuclear proliferation argue that nuclear weapons provide a deterrent against aggression from enemy countries.... As other nations developed the capability to produce nuclear weapons, limiting nuclear proliferation to the greatest degree possible became one of the primary goals of American foreign policy....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Cater Administration and the Evolution of American Nuclear Non-profileration Policy

The aim of the Carter administration's non-proliferation measures was to decrease the whole amount of nuclear weapons in the world and to control possible proliferation.... “Non-proliferation policy” refers to foreign policy measures directed at reducing world nuclear weapons through international treaties between states possessing nuclear technology or trying to have it.... The USA, one of the main nuclear countries in the world, waged the Cold War against the Soviet Union, and some critics of the Carter administration argued that in these conditions the....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The reation and Incidence of Nuclear Weapons

The reporter underlines that creation and incidence of nuclear weapons have led them to be ranked as the most dangerous weapons to exist on earth which possess the ability to destroy an area as massive as an entire city.... The paper will compare the articles written by John Muller and Robert Gallucci and discuss their viewpoints where Muller believes that nuclear weapons pose no threat to the world and Gallucci has stated that these weapons can be dangerous....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Using of Nuclear Weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the Second World War

In this context, a revolution was constituted soon after the inception of nuclear weapons in the modern warfare.... Comparatively, the use of nuclear weapons is deemed to impose brutal and more destructive effects in nature than any other war weaponries used throughout the centuries.... From the worldview, the nuclear weapons dropped by the American Air Force Bombers on respectively 6th and 9th August 1945 had been considered as the most destructive and consequential events in the modern warfare history2....
41 Pages (10250 words) Essay

Terrorism---criminal justice

Israel possession of nuclear weapons is shrouded in secretes and there are no clear regulations or policies indicating the Terrorism-criminal justice Terrorism refers to the use of threats to intimi the victims.... Israel possession of nuclear weapons is shrouded in secretes and there are no clear regulations or policies indicating the country's possession of these weapons.... Amimut refers to the Israel official policy of concealing information on nuclear weapons adopted in 1969 in the Nixon-Meir deal....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

British Nuclear Weapons: Strengthening Power and Influence in the World

The author of this paper "British nuclear weapons: Strengthening Power and Influence in the World" will discuss the United Kingdom's role during the Cold War and find out why it is necessary to adopt the United States doctrine of Massive Retaliation.... Does possession of nuclear weapons actually increase the power and influence of the United Kingdom?... In the following year, convinced that nuclear weapons would be the future of warfare and aiming for an actual nuclear defense of Western Europe (Baylis 1995, p....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Factor Preventing States from Acquiring Nuclear Weapons

The author of "What Is the Single Most Important Factor Preventing, or at Least Dissuading States from Acquiring nuclear weapons" paper states that the behavior of nuclear countries directly depends on the behavior and interaction of the other nuclear countries.... At the same time, states with nuclear weapons do not provide any additional benefits.... In order to maintain peace and reduce security dilemmas, the non – nuclear power nations have to avoid the development and use of nuclear weapons....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us