The world today has become a system of interdependent states, which need each other to survival in an increasingly competitive international system. This interdependence among states means that they have to find ways of relating with each other in order to maintain international security…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Theories of International Relations"
Download file to see previous pages
42). As a result of the complexity in international relations, this field of study has attracted numerous scholars who come up with theories to explain international behavior among states. For most theorists of international relations the state is the primary player that determines the direction in international matters. Olson and Groom (1992, pp. 274) state that the policies adopted by a certain state go along way into shaping its relationship with other states, thus molding international relations. The field of international relations widely accepts anarchy as one of the possible explanations for behavior in international politics. Different theorists of international relations have varying concepts on the issue of anarchy. To some pessimists, anarchy is totally appalling, while to some optimists, anarchy can be advantageous to a state. More specifically, there is a “myth” of international anarchy that provides that ‘Anarchy is what states make of it’. According to Weber (2004, pp. 63) this myth of international relations holds that the outcomes of global anarchy vary from one state to another. This means that one cannot predict how anarchy will affect a given state, since different states have different responses to anarchy. Essentially, anarchy may cause either cooperation or conflicts among states, depending on the policies of each individual state on international behavior (Griffith, 1999; pp. 154). Accordingly, it is critical to have deeper insight into the concept of international anarchy; its meaning, origins, the role it plays in international relations. It essential to consider how individual states have it in their power to shape international relations by choosing the consequences that anarchy is going to have on them and other states they interact with. For most people, especially those not concerned with the study of international relations, the term anarchy is associated with disorganization, violence, and absence of laws to govern the actions of people. This means that most people view anarchy as being characterized by severe social and political instability, meaning that anarchy is a threat to international order and security (Griffiths, 1999; pp. 145). With such a mindset, anarchy is depicted as the very opposite of civilization and most people would rather do without anarchy. However, in the study of international relations, different scholars have different views concerning international anarchy and its consequences on international politics. Some see anarchy as negative, while others see it a positive. Yet for some, international anarchy can have either negative or positive effects or both on a state and in the entire field of international politics. Nevertheless, all theorists of international anarchy agree that anarchy is caused by lack of a universal government. In the field of international relations, anarchy is not necessarily considered a theory; rather it is taken as a myth by theorists of international relations. Theorists of international anarchy hold that the world is made of sovereign states, each yielding power over its territory, people, and resources. According to Brown (2002, pp. 145,) such a sovereign state holds the ultimate power over its area of jurisdiction and no other authority, whether domestic or international, should challenge its position. Therefore, as far as international politics of anarchy are concerned, all states are sovereign, but the degrees of sovereignty vary from state to state. International independence among states varies, according to the political structures of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“Theories of International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Theories of International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1400735-theories-of-international-relations
(Theories of International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
Theories of International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1400735-theories-of-international-relations.
“Theories of International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1400735-theories-of-international-relations.
In accordance with this, a realist analysis may proceed in evaluating the importance of global security, international hegemony, natural resources, and “democratization” in reference to the NATO deployment in Afghanistan. The justification for the use of NATO forces in Afghanistan is based on the association of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden with the Taliban in the country, who were in control of the State apparatus in 2001 when the 9/11 attacks occurred.
However, the countries often interact in a number of way a fact that validates the existence of policies governing the international relations of the countries. Among the most common forms of inter countries relationship is through the establishment of multinational corporations such as Coca cola that is American yet access the international market.
This paper starts with an analysis on the very nature of the states existences and then proceeds to analyze how states interact with each. The author argues that it is because of the growing state necessity to be the global hegemon that states attempt to maximize their world power. States holistically operate in the sense of their own self interest.
The Marxist approach to international relations encompass both traditional Marxist and Neo –Marxist positivist paradigms which do not support the realist view of state conflicts and emphasises on the economic aspects of society with the social class as central to Marxist interpretations of society.
In the study undertaken, the main objective is to be able to present a view on the International Relations (IR) and other related social theories specifically the postmodernism theory. The present trend of the international community can be viewed towards the trend of globalization and oneness. The interaction can be considered as a significant focus.
This paper concerns the realism and liberalism as the two major theories of international politics. Although they differ with respect to their basic assumptions about the nation-state, the international order and the role of conflict in the international system, both of them provide substantial insight into the ways in which the international order is structured.
The author states that one of the core ideas in Liberal thinking is that of the democratic peace thesis derived from the Kantian maxim claiming that republican (democratic) states do not fight one another. For Kant, the reasoning was simple: democratic states were internally more peaceful due to the pacific effects of international trade.
h as the advancement of technologies implied in the worldwide communications, the emergence of global businesses and international trade, multinational companies and the likes. And all of these can be summed up in the celebrated maxim known as globalization, which at the start
Due to this independence from each other, the states are never interested in the happenings of another state. This theory can be seen as a classic case of self-preservation by the individual states. Therefore, one state
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Theories of International Relations"
with a personal 20% discount.