Nobody downloaded yet

In what ways was the Ottoman Empire different to its West European counterparts - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Differences between the Ottoman Empire and its West European counterparts Institution Date Introduction The following discussion attempts to evaluate differences between the Ottoman Empire and its Western European counterparts. In order to have a logically structured discussion, this paper provides an overview of the Ottoman Empire on one hand and its West European counterparts…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
In what ways was the Ottoman Empire different to its West European counterparts
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "In what ways was the Ottoman Empire different to its West European counterparts"

Download file to see previous pages During the reign of Muhammad II that lasted between 1451 and 1481, Ottoman Empire was actively involved in absorbing other states. Within this period Ottoman Empire was able to end all the other local Turkish dynasties hence becoming the superpowers of the region. With such a heavy backing from the fact that they had no dynasties to compete with, Ottoman Empire’s expansion started under Osman I, Orkhan, Murad I, and Beyazid I, which happened at the expense of numerous other empires such as Byzantine, Serbia, and Bulgaria. Due to pressure from Ottoman, another active and strong empire, Bursa fell in 1326, which was followed by the fall of Adrianople in 1261 (Said, 1978). Amazing, besides ensuring that these two (Bursa and Adrianople) empires fell, Ottoman Empire mocked them by making them the capital of the empire in turns that is, when Bursa fell it was made the capital and later on Adrianople was made the capital of the empire after its fall (Dale, 2010). This marked the beginning of expansion for Ottoman Empire, which continuously grew and developed through taking over other Turkish dynasties or empires. Period of Great Expansion Through Muhammad I, Ottoman Empire was united against other empires. Muhammad I strongly believed that the only way of expanding of the empire was to take over other empires that surrounded Ottoman Empire. Consequently, many empires were victims of such strategy thus marking the initial stage of the “Great Expansion” (Dale, 2010). Amongst the taking over that occurred during the period of Great Expansion include victory at Varna and the 1453 capture of Constantinople. It is amazing how Ottomans changed from nomads to being the heirs of most ancient existing empire within Europe (Palmer, 1992). The weakness and disunity of the adversaries that competed and surrounded Ottoman Empire was a great step in enhancing the empire’s success. In addition, Ottoman through Muhammad I created a well-organized military group, which ensured that all the captures and take over was successfully done (Dale, 2010). Their military organization was considered superior to all the other surrounding dynasties (Said, 1978). Surprisingly, such military organizations consisted of mainly Christians who were not only corps of Janissaries but also volunteers who were ready to fight for their empire (Dale, 2010). With such beautifully organized military organization, Ottoman was able to continuously expand until the 16th century where the expansion and growth of the empire reached its peak. Defeating the Hungarian in 1526 gave Ottoman Empire a boost and confidence in more capture and take-over especially the 1541 capture of Buda as well as taking in of major part of Hungary that form Ottoman’s empire. Continuous capturing and taking over of different dynasties led to the opening up of the empire’s boundaries into Persia and Arabia; a factor that enhanced the strength within the region. During the reign of Selim I, more dynasties were defeated giving opportunity and strength for the expansion and growth of Ottoman Empire. In 1535 when Sulayman I started his reign, the empire continued to capture and take over more empires in a bid to being the heir ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“In what ways was the Ottoman Empire different to its West European Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(In What Ways Was the Ottoman Empire Different to Its West European Essay)
“In What Ways Was the Ottoman Empire Different to Its West European Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF In what ways was the Ottoman Empire different to its West European counterparts

Safavids and Ottoman empire

.... The policies as well as the ideologies of these had been greatly shaped by the militarism of those empire-builders. Indeed the militarisms of these empires were fervently supported by the ideologies and policies that they adopted. Indeed the moral strengths and the popular support were achieved mainly by managing the commoners’ religiosity but in two different ways. When the Ottoman empire-builders upheld their image as the holy soldiers or the army of God, the Safavid rulers argued that only the true descendants of Hazrat Ali, one of the blood relatives of Holy Prophet, Muhammad and the followers of Ali can rule the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

History: Ottoman Empire

...of independence, and whose unique cultural realities enhanced and deepened that of the Ottoman Empire. Yet, as the Ottomans advanced toward West and the absorption of the Balkan and Greek peoples continued, the Persian and Turkic-oriented traditions of its rulers itself adopted several cultural aspects of the subjugated populations (Mansel 1996, 43). The Osmanli, or the men of the governing empire, got married to women of different indigenous groups (Aksan 2004, 58) and hence the leaders themselves were of varied cultural and racial legacy. Intellectual The integration of the Ottoman...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Ottoman Empire

...the soldiers attempted to grab from the villagers and the disciplined army considered only each one’s gain. This marked for the decline of the Empire. Economic Power: The Ottoman Empire in its golden age was set on a stable economy. It is said, “Istanbul and other major cities served as centers for transregional trade, where merchants from different lands bought or sold European woolens, Persian silk, Chinese porcelain, Indian spices, Arab sugar, and Anatolian iron” (New Challenges for Africa and the Islamic World 1450-1750, p.477). The market was governed by artisan and merchants guilds with elected leaders. There was a systematic...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Turkish Foreign Policy since the Ottoman Empire

...was the universal leader of the Muslims used propaganda and counter-propaganda. However, he did not anticipate that opposition could come from an Islamic perspective. This Sunni idea was largely opposed by the Shiite Iran who did not recognize the Ottoman Empire as it occupied what was traditionally land owned by the Arabs, due to endless persecution, the As Shiites and the Sunnis waged an endless war depending on which side they supported.1 As a method to re-engineer the state towards attaining legitimacy, the Ottoman Empire bought about education through the imposition of uniform religious values through primary and secondary education. This has however been proved to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Ottoman Empire golden age

...between the compounded parts of the Ottoman Empire at various times throughout history. One could argue that the centralisation that the use of Islam was able to affect far outweighed any of the drawbacks that it exhibited. Nonetheless, striking figures such as Vlad III and others attest to the fact that Ottoman rule and its utilization of Islam as a centralizing and homogenizing influence was often resented to the point that open insurrection and rebellion resulted. Yet another aspect of this utilization of Islam being negative for the growth and development of the Empire over time is with respect to the visceral response the jihadist often had within...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Ottoman Empire realize that the introduction of gold and precious metals had a vital impact on the Ottoman economy. Significantly, the introduction of various precious metals played a major influence on the European economy. Similarly, gold and precious metals played a major impact on the various aspects of the economy and these metals contributed to the increase in prices in the Ottoman Empire towards the end of the sixteenth century. "The great change in the European economy wrought by all this precious metal also had its effects on the Ottoman Empire. Since European merchants traded in...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The history of Ottoman empire

...Ottoman empire The Ottoman empire was an imperial that existed from 1299 to 1922. At the height of its power in the 16th century, it included Anatolia, the Middle East, parts of North Africa, and much of south-eastern Europe to the Caucasus. It comprised an area of about 5.6 million km squared, though it controlled a much larger area through indirect rule in adjoining areas dominated mainly by nomadic tribes. The Empire was situated in the Middle East and West, and interacted with both the East and the West throughout its six-century history . The Ottoman...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...and security by the government personnel (Agoston and Master 192). The use of coins and precious metal also changed the way trading was done across the empire as goods could be sold easily. Trade policies were also implemented in the Ottoman Empire, in order to restrict both the export and importation of goods. The Sultan was concerned with ensuring that its citizens had been enough goods. Because of this, the Sultan made policies that discouraged the exportation of goods to foreign nations. This was possible through the use of taxes and custom duty (Agoston and Master 192). On the contrary, the Ottoman government encouraged imports by...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Colonialism. Ottoman Empire

...side of colonization such as the Ottoman Empire is the fact that they ruled over numerous countries and did not treat them in a just fashion. At its heights of its powers, the Ottoman Empire ruled over the following nations: Turkey Egypt Greece Bulgaria Romania Macedonia Hungary Palestine Jordan Lebanon Syria Parts of Arabia Much of the coastal strip of North Africa This is a huge number and goes to show the amount of plundering the Ottomans did in order to sustain them. They ruled the roost in those days and colonization was the driving factor behind them having the surge they had in the medieval ages. The Turks very...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Ottoman Empire

...Legacy of the Ottoman Empire The contributions of Ottoman Empire to the development of Arab world in general and Turkey particular cannot be neglected. Even though Ottomans tried to extend their power to the entire Arab world, they were keen in preserving the values and beliefs of Islamic religion. They never tried to dilute religious principles and beliefs for economic and political gains. The contributions or the legacies of Ottoman Empire in political, economic and cultural circles are still helping Arab world in many ways. One of the major legacies left behind by the Ottoman...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic In what ways was the Ottoman Empire different to its West European counterparts for FREE!

Contact Us