This paper seeks to evaluate the nature and the concept of war on terror. It delves into seeking to understand the manner and the level in which the realism theories and ideologies explain the war on terror. …
Download file to see previous pages...
These are some of the questions that this paper seeks to address. In the quest to understand and clearly explain the understanding of war on terror from a realist’s angle this paper shall be divided into six main parts.
Part I shall be introductory chapter. Here the will be no deep analysis but rather introducing the subject matter. Here the paper shall be generally giving an overview of what shall be later broken down and explained in nitty gritty.
The second Part is dealing with Realism as a school of thought. Here the paper shall delve into what actually is the scope of the realism school of thinking. The paper shall also discuss the proponents of this school of thought as well as their contributions.
The third part shall be tackling war on terror itself. Here the paper talks about what components are considered when we are discussing the war on terror. The paper shall examine why is it that terrorism is treated as a war and not just a crime.
The next part shall be assessing the dilemma that exists between war on terror against the desire to protect human rights and the rule of law. Why is it that the proponents of realism theory especially on war on terror are normally in conflicting opinions with the human rights activists? After the analysis the paper gives position as to how human rights can be understood from the realist’s perspective.
This awareness has quite increased since the 9/11 bombing by Al Qaeda. This was not the first bombing as there had been others. However, after that the American government declared war on terror the question being asked is whether the average American feels safer than before or if there is paranoia. This war on terror extended to Afghanistan. For sometime people that this war would only lasts a few days or months but it took years. Some analysts began to view it as a political war. Then the human rights activists began questioning the legitimacy of the means by which this war on terror was generally being conducted. Debates emerged trying to explain the reasons and rationale for the wars. Several schools of thought emerged. Realism also emerged but has faced criticisms from other scholars especially whose with a bias towards human rights activism. What relationship is created between realism theory and the war on terror? Some scholars such Mearsheimer argues that war on terror is actuated by the fact threats exist and people are not safer than earlier before. It is for the this reason that Meiseshemier actually propounds that united states have used the realism school of thought as United State requires security. This is the reality according to Mearsheimer. Stephen D. Kranshen propounds that realism is all about international relations. These two theories as much as they are from the same realist angle they vary in meaning. However a critical analysis shows that there is a nexus between these two. 3.0 Realism as a school of reasoning Realism is a school of thought which in political science and a philosophical sense seeks to offer explanation on the foreign policy that has remained consistent and is still existent over a
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Can the war on terror be understood in terms of realism Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1394309-can-the-war-on-terror-be-understood-in-terms-of
(Can the War on Terror Be Understood in Terms of Realism Essay)
“Can the War on Terror Be Understood in Terms of Realism Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1394309-can-the-war-on-terror-be-understood-in-terms-of.
The “War on Terror” is a blanket cause that allows the United States to intervene on any activities it considers to be terrorism. The war is fighting a faceless enemy, therefore it could be anyone. President Obama has chosen to withdrawal troops as well as focus on humanitarian aid.
This was the day America would never forget and forgive. America realized the gravity of terrorism and the situation for the first time what most nations face on daily basis worldwide. It was also not a welcome fact that post 9/11 we discovered that the terrorist outfits which attacked us were actually trained by us.
For this purpose, realism, neo realism, liberalism and neo liberalism theories will be critically analysed and discussed. The United States attacked Afghanistan to safeguard its interest against terrorist activities by exercising its power and military dominance.
Theories relating to just war have always tried distinguish between the right and wrong in these power games. The terminological conclusions of this distinction are the terms ‘just war’ and ‘terrorism’. “Terrorism is the random killing of innocent people, in the hope of creating pervasive fear” (Walzer, 2006).
" (Thomas Diez 2006)
Governments of many western countries today have passed several legislations based on their anti-terrorists activity measures, which also have the effect of restricting the individual freedoms in a way that would not have considered legitimate prior to 9/11 incident.
The war on terror is going on thereby making the political grounds of the country vulnerable day by day and making more and more people psychologically weak. It seems as if both, 'war' and 'war on terror' has given nothing to the people but fear and anxiety to survive.
r answers to life’s questions, who are we, why are we here and what we should accomplish while we live are questions that have been pondered throughout the ages yet without definitive answers. Each person decides for themselves how they perceive their own existence, what
The effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York, which resulted in more than 3,000 innocent people killed spread human misery further than those persons affected directly by the loss of lives. The U.S. economy was held
For the purpose of this paper, war on terror will be understood from the U.S. perspective and what the U.S. think-tanks consider realism to formulate their war policies.
Realism itself isn’t a strict description. Looking at the variations in its definition
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Can the war on terror be understood in terms of realism for FREE!