New Christian Right in US Politics - Essay Example

?Running Head: New Christian Right in US Politics New Christian Right in US Politics [Institute’s TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 3 NEW CHRISTIAN RIGHT 4 RESERVE MOBILIZATION 6 REASONS FOR NEW CHRISTIAN RIGHT IN US POLITICS 9 CONCLUSION 18 REFERENCES 20 NEW CHRISTIAN RIGHT IN US POLITICS INTRODUCTION The famous social movement, Christian Right, once known as a raucous but in the end unsuccessful political power, reinvented itself during the last part of 1980s. Under the leadership of people who restored the clergy initiators, the altered faction apparently implemented an additionally practical political approach deferring better political pressure (Schafer, p. 29, 2011). Despite the fact that these campaigners looked like their republican as well as autonomous corresponding persons in quite a lot of respects, the representatives with Christian Right ties were not mainly successful and were unsuccessful to form an operational coalition with the majority republicans on the mission. The centre of the crisis was the continuance by the communal traditionalists of a ‘foreigner’ point of view that toughened their pedant point of reference to civic dealings (Culver & Dorhauer, p. 43, 2007). The Christian Right has attained considerable representation within American communal life. Even though this sort of demonstration may have presented significant representative advantages, the force to protect public agency was acceptable as the way towards putting a stop. The objective of the Christian Right, stating generally, has been to alter American public strategy in the way of what are known as family or conventional standards. Despite the fact that researchers have collected many statistics on the communal as well as electoral foundation of the faction, they have given very small amount of facts with reference to its impact on civic strategy (Ishay, p. 59, 2008). The fundamental issue is whether Christian Right leaders have made an unbeaten shift from ‘foreigner’ to ‘insider politics’, or if they stay traditionalists who have yet to change completely to the traditions of politics. The coalition between right-wing religious conviction and traditionalist politics had an extensive derivation in American political life, and the alliance would grow so long as it carried on to provide the concerns of both accomplices. Subsequent to a series of strategy failures throughout the presidency of its former enthusiast, the movement appeared to fall apart during the 1988 drive for the Republican presidential selection (Meyers, p. 193, 2006). As a number of the original tycoons who had driven the movement stepped out of political activities, quite a lot of researchers were fast to mark obituaries with reference to this latest fatality of America's determinedly incremental political structure. At base, the conversion of the Christian Right portrayed by supporters of the next generation concerned the progress grip on pluralism. In the pluralist assumption of American politics, the utter variety of clusters functional within the political structure mainly prevents fundamental alteration. In the pluralist point of view, the structure progresses by small strides, motivated mainly by stress from groups that can create a centre of attention for adequate supporters by logrolling as well as vote trading to make short-lived common coalitions. Faced with this cruel truth, movements that come into politics, in search for radical change have to reconcile instead for additional modification by implementing the standards of alliance formation as well as conciliation (Butler, p. 193, 2006). For that to take place, non-transferable requirements have to be substituted by negotiating as well as by taking trade-offs into consideration. The substitute is marginalization along with the political wilderness. NEW CHRISTIAN RIGHT At its core, the Christian Right was the interest group of ethical re-establishment that recognized settled as a ‘give in’ (Hedges, p. 172, 2007). Its organizers were uncomfortable pluralists who perceived obvious inconsistency as the most excellent policy and were more at ease with ‘hit and negotiate’ as compared to ‘bargain and settle’. They opted to demonize rivals as well as unenthusiastic supporters instead of working with them to get acknowledgments. As actual supporters, affirmed that the divine power is on their side, the organizers of Christian conservatism were reluctant to take part in the political competition by its conventional regulations (Gushee, p. 20, 2008). In implementing this approach, they looked like the shock groups of former ideological activities, right as well as left wing that have intermittently made American political atmosphere lively. The development of the faction from ‘old’ to ‘new’ includes modifications within strategic policy, specifically its booming utilization of broad-mindedness to get support of voters, its utilization of mass media interactions as a promotional device as well as its noticeable political activism mutually on nationalized as well as neighbouring stages. For the duration of its evolution, the policy as well as rhetoric of the Christian Right movement has transformed, turning out to be outstandingly secular, judicious, and politically familiarized in its policy to continuing communal alteration (Blaker, p. 103, 2003). The New Right, signified by the Christian alliance, uses political as well as governmental funds to assemble a communal expression of its discontented standard of living. This occurrence - the enlistment of discontented standard of living - needs an analysis of both the function of dissatisfaction within the course of enthusiasm along with the function of planned enlistment of that dissatisfaction. This occurrence as well includes phases of governmental arrangement. Overall, for a communal movement representation to be broad, it is required to include rank politics as well as reserve mobilization assumption with the intention of accounting for both joint activities - or enthusiasm - and governmental phases - or mobilization method (Berlet & Lyons, p. 153, 2000). RESERVE MOBILIZATION The reserve mobilization assumption has been a main hypothetical justification of communal as well as political activities. Contrasting the rank politics representation, which attempts to clarify the function of joint conviction in communal activities, reserve mobilization assumption de-highlights the function of communal conviction, specifically, personal as well as group communal psychosomatic variables in describing the growth of communal activities (Goldberg, p. 104, 2006). The reserve mobilization point of view discards the thought that criticisms as well as dissatisfaction are normal and unplanned reactions to the view of cultural alteration like a risk to a specific conviction structure. Instead, political mobilization is taken as the basis and the dissatisfaction occurred as the outcome of that mobilization. In accordance with the reserve mobilization representation, communal activities may not be supported by combined criticisms - position apprehensions - at all. To a certain extent, criticisms as well as restlessness may be classified, generated, and influenced by concerned entrepreneurs, along with unions (Rudin, p. 183, 2005). Senior residents were activated to campaign for Medicare just after legislation was taken sooner than legislative body as well as the American Medical Association had declared that senior residents had not been criticizing the Medicare activities. Alternatively, to say it in a different manner, the Medicare group did not grow from a mutually shared accusation with Medicare strategies; rather, it extended merely when judicious players within the political arrangement organized the necessary capital. In accordance with the reserve mobilization perspective, management of as well as involvement in communal activities are measured through objective variables, for instance, the ease of use of governmental, support base associated, financial, and alike assets (Waldman, p. 122, 2008). These variables are handled from the point of view of the judicious player occurrence. That is, the judicious player - single person or faction - utilizes planned way of thinking to carry out cooperative action attempts. This perceptive is separate from the combined behaviour point of views, for instance, position in politics representation, whereby the “crowd or masses” are the principal component of investigation for combined achievement. In addition, combined achievement, from the cooperative behaviour point of views, for instance, the standing in politics representation, is only an expression of conflict to a number of public damages, instead of an anticipated as well as controlled attempt on the part of various public groups. A significant component in the reserve mobilization plan is the considered part of governmental control: its technique of protecting assets and converting those assets into funds to sustain the established objectives of the movement (Neiwert, p. 132, 2009). Successful movement’s heads are required to be compelling - the talent to manipulate civic views so that they are steady with the directions of the movement. A compelling person in charge should as well be creative. Personality makes him or her affable; however his or her monetary as well as political abilities make the movement booming. With regard to the New Christian Rights, both the cooperative activities as well as the judicious player factors are apparent, that is, at the same time as the masses is a main unit of study so are the governmental reserve associated components (Boston, p. 184, 1996). As a result, cooperative activities as well as communal accomplishment do actually work together with one another, in that cooperative activities is rational if it is offered with reasonable as well as controlled resources, such as cash, political sustenance, a generally prosperous membership support, along with compelling control (Zwier, p. 82, 1992). Successful control is a particularly significant component since it extends joint group awareness. By the formation as well as utilization of symbols - given by the representative politics model - the successful leader recognizes and identifies the basis of restlessness for the essential support. In particular, “through use of symbols such as biblical references and allusions to millennial themes, leaders are able to frame political issues in such a way that they become comprehensible symbols of the movement goals” (Lienesch? p. 102 1993). That is, by metaphorically linking political concerns with well-known references, leaders are capable to politicize factions not otherwise politically dynamic. Judicious involves formation, plan, and political conciliation, while irrational is generally linked with the masses, anarchical, radical, anti-establishment activities (Lyons, p. 222, 2010). The judicious group is incorporating the key players within the joint communal, cultural, and political arguments who acquire, signify, and follow combined interests by means of rationality. Therefore, a new study categorizes the group with respect to two components: (1) the action that it carries out as a group, such as polling activities along with parliamentary lobbying and (2) the joint benefits that encourage action, such as the fundamental communal, structural, and cultural strains that prepare the field for restlessness on the part of some faction. As this paper states, the two essential components of this description of the faction as rational actor join the hypothetical point of views of both the reserve mobilization as well as the standing in politics models. The coordinating factors of reserve mobilization are: (1) aimed objectives (or movement objectives), (2) supporters, (3) citizens, (4) prospective beneficiaries, (5) conscience supporters, and (6) conscience citizens (Shields, p. 120, 2009). Every division has a set of aimed objectives, for example, a set of ideal communal, political, or cultural alterations toward which it is functioning. The total activity aimed on the achievement of some or all objectives is dependent on the capital held by that division, for instance, funds, access to as well as utilization of media exposure, amenities, and control. REASONS FOR NEW CHRISTIAN RIGHT IN US POLITICS The separation of Southern Democrats from the egalitarian party chipped in to the rise of the Right. Besides, as the egalitarian group turns out to be known for a pro-alternative spot on abortion as well as with non-conventional communal ethics, public conventional joined the Republican group in rising amounts. Study of any political faction must include the interactions as well as governmental capacities that are essential to political movement focussed at accomplishing the following aimed objectives: (1) time, (2) funds, and (3) civic expertise. The attainment, expansion, as well as allocation of these funds are an important aspect in the contemplation and calculation of the general accomplishment of a politically adjusted division, which is the New Christian Movement (Utter & True, p. 301, 2004). In calculating the achievement, or to some extent the impact of the New Right, the demographic profile of the faction sponsorship highlights the allegation that time, funds, and civic expertise are more realistic for this group as compared to its existing counterparts. That is, the generally notable sacred demographic feature of the faction is its always Southern, white, upper-middle group of people, college literate voters. Apparently, New Right associates have more funds, time, and civic expertise as compared to the members in other movements, which try to find societal as well as political policy alteration. This demographic outline contrasted with the New Right trademark, refined grassroots mobilization can be described by the political part of congregational churches as well as sacred political awareness associations, for instance, the ethical mainstream, and the Christian alliance: these associations - congregational churches in addition to religio-political interest factions - work as training positions for civic expertise (Stenger, p. 192, 2009). As a result, a main source during the configuration of a division is the devotion itself. This significant source is categorized into two separate partisanship clusters: first, are supporters and second are citizens. Supporters are those people as well as associations that are cognitive followers of the objectives or ideological foundation of the Movement. The citizens are the people as well as associations that in fact promote and make use of civic expertise to create assisting material resources, for instance funds, political influence in the shape of elector’s learning / orientation, and public relations. The urgent objective of the New Christian Right Movement, afterwards, is to transfer citizens into important elements - the supporters. Logical group is the part of combined interest in mobilizing achievement. Reserve mobilization premise states that the attainment of prospective supporters as well as the protection of immediate citizens is found out by whether they will gain directly from the achievement of objectives. Individuals who would gain directly from objective achievement are prospective beneficiaries. The real job of mobilizing reserves requires concentrating on those supporters who are prospective beneficiaries and / or try to transfer onlooker community - citizens - who are prospective beneficiaries into supporters (Gribben, p. 200, 2009). The Movement may as well develop the totality of its objectives, and therefore philosophy, to demand for an additionally diffuse prospective beneficiary faction. Such as the rhetoric of the New Christian Right movement reveals that it has developed its policy to attract every conventional, that is, anybody who has its socio-ethical standards in connection with political gains - one time concerns and other parliamentary schedules. Respectively, this trait of the Movement as well reveals the distinct political development of the movement during the last decade, that is, the planned way of thinking that governmental / interest faction power is legitimized by elector in addition to supporters as well as essential figures (Ryan & Switzer, p. 240, 2009). At last, it may make an effort to mobilize as supporters, those who are not prospective beneficiaries, mainly within the broader community. Conscience supporters are individuals as well as factions who have a combined concern, but whose loyalty would not assure key gains from objective success. Conscience citizens are direct fans, who do not rise to gain directly from objective success and as a result, may not enthusiastically take part in the communal or political lobbying actions. However, these citizens may operate as indirect and additionally subtle resources. Such as conscience citizens may reinforce the self-esteem of the real membership at the unofficial communal or even congregational (unofficial church) point. These human resources offer strengthening and support by putting in their verbal support to the civic responsiveness across different local organizations, for instance, the school, family unit, neighbourhood, and church (Beckwith, p. 66, 2010). Despite the fact that reserve mobilization hypothesis successfully offers a structure with which to analyze the formation and preparation, it does not describe when as well as why a group communal awareness, or mutual quality, is pertinent to the development of a communal movement association. For this reason, with regard to communal movements, the status politics representation is unable to identify the role of the specific logical player, and the reserve mobilization representation is unable to identify the part of the communal principles of the group as it cooperates in the wider communal, political, and cultural perspective. The case of the New Religious Right movement shows the requirement to combine the two forms. The status politics model effectively describes when and why a cooperative interest encourages the development of a communal faction. Respectively, the reserve mobilization representation effectively clarifies the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of communal action used to promote the cooperative interest (Bruce, p. 188, 1995). The anti-socialist, anti-Catholic, anti-communal interests Right dealt with political ideas, but its driving force was enlightening instead of political. In view of the fact that the New Christian Right is dynamic, as a communal, spiritual, and political group and carry on to develop with respect to its political approach. This revolution was rather abrupt as well as astonishing. Of all the changes and blows within modern political life, possibly nothing was as entirely surprising as the political revival of fundamentalist Protestantism (Marshall, p. 208, 2007). Indication of better political activism is general: (1) mass mailings carries out by key Christian associations, (2) countrywide fundraising attempts for political caucuses, elector-listing drives, along with media information. A remarkable addition of verification for this political beginning is apparent within an evaluation of appraisal records, which have quick differences within evangelical political approaches during two phases, (1) pre 1990 and (2) post 1990. Elector listing, in particular, offers a significant motivation to the political mobilization of the movement in the 1990’s. The approximate numeral of registered voters diverges extensively. The ethical mainstream only was in charge for the listing of more or less 2.5 million electors during 1990; the amount of listed electors was somewhere between 250,000 and 3,000,000 as of 1994 (Cormartie, p. 84, 1999). Research attempts earlier than 1990 were unable to give the value as well as representativeness of future studies, yet are steady in connection with the common evangelical character toward political dealings. Usually, evangelicals considered political procedures as further than the area of spiritual apprehension, and as a result were less expected to be politically dynamic. For instance, a recent research of Protestants within Indiana hints that any type of political activism, together with having correspondence with congressional members and joining society factions, was not very common in evangelicals in comparison with other spiritual factions. New York State reveals that individuals achieving high on an index of customary Protestant spiritual prevailing attitude were more liable to be of the same opinion as the statement. In particular, churches must attach to religious conviction and not worry themselves with communal, financial, as well as political issues in comparison with low scorers (Alexander, p. 99, 20008). On the other hand, it can be said that low scorers and / or less self-identified customary evangelicals were more apt to play a part in American political procedures as compared to conscientiously conformist Protestants. Survey records from the 1992 voting, shows that affiliates of fundamentalist, conventional denominations were less expected as compared to affiliates of less conventional, mainline denominations to have nominated, showed awareness in, or even appreciated the significance of political involvement. Outcomes for the clergy give same outcomes, that is, a research attempt involving more than 2000 Protestant clergy within California during the year 1998, shows that customary conformist way of life was pessimistically in linkage with having given a discourse on a divisive political or communal concern. In addition, it having categorized a number of politically linked society affair for the church, and having gathered a communal attitude on a divisive concern (Markham, p. 184, 1994). The previous evangelical inclination to depart from political procedures is logical, provided the past foundations of the movement, particularly the 19th century fundamentalist policy of safeguarding of harsh convention taking into consideration the modernizing drifts within American administration. On the other hand, survey records subsequent to 1990, shows a progressive alteration in evangelical approaches as well as activities in connection with cultural, communal, and political concerns. The New Christian Right varies significantly from the previous Right. The most considerable variations are showed within the movement’s inclinations for: (1) the organization of an accommodating countrywide as well as local governmental arrangement. (2) Secondly, the considerable and impressive participation of the movement in countrywide as well as local political procedures, and (3) the growth of a set of movement aims, ideological foundation stones in addition to a approach to appreciate those goals. Contrasting the old one, the New Christian Right is more perfectly considered as a communal movement group, where the level of governmental as well as following usefulness is sophisticated, refined, and developed. The New Right is composed of more plainly classified levels: (1) the central control along with its equivalent associations; (2) the varied ‘single concern’ factions that operate under or jointly with the fundamental organizations; and (3) the voters that the nationwide as well as local activist factions try to mobilize (Taylor, p. 109, 2005). The old right was short of the governmental, political, and ideological factors to make as well as support a broad based faction. The New Right gradually turns out to be better. It has developed to sustain quite a lot of big, nationwide associations, recognized national as well as local management, an open system of television evangelists, and even the working class support and funds to support a presidential candidate. That is, as it grows as a movement, it turns out to be more and more dominant as an association within American politics. Contrasting the New Christian Right, the political effectiveness of the old one consisted mostly of communal as well as cultural disturbances revealed by means of the awkward political attempts of organizers, for instance, ‘Hargis’ and ‘McIntire’ (Rozeli & Hamilton, p. 49, 2011). Governmental formation was slack and stalled by pious as well as ideological cleavages amid conformist and noninterventionist Protestants. The lack of a united movement philosophy, in addition to chaotic governmental solidity is apparent in the lack of distinct and steady voter bank. The old right electorate is as well described by a thin and narrow-minded form - white, politically conventional, southern, college literate churchgoers - revealing the lack of a broad support of admiration as well as demand of the movement for Americans. The New Christian Right management strengthened its disjointed followers in addition to prospective benefactors by expressing a definable objective to channel the movement. The New Right philosophy was a union of three sets of premises: (1) monetary libertarianism, (2) communal orthodoxy and, (3) revolutionary anti-Marxism (Weaver & Appleby, p. 233, 1995). These premises are not inevitably coexisting or hypothetically consistent with past. Nevertheless, the New Christian Right categorizes with these premises, and any particular concerns that connect to such premises. Monetary libertarianism is an ideological premise that attempts to classify modern financial crisis within the United States of America, for instance, rising prices, increase in taxes, joblessness, and falling output. The continuation of these dilemmas is recognized by the Religious Right as the outcome of noninterventionist monetary approaches, for instance government expenditure on communal programs in addition to government involvement in business. The perceptions of independence as well as individuality, with respect to market context, are observed as the solution to monetary setbacks. Communal orthodoxy is possibly fundamental within the New Right thematic expression, and is usually in linkage with the failure of family, society, religious conviction, and customary ethics within American way of life (Willis & Hardcastle, p. 34, 2005). Particular concerns linked with this premise are drugs, abortion, sexual liberalism, embargos on school prayer and, the secular set of courses in the public educational institutions. Similar to the financial issues in the monetary libertarianism, the New Right links these setbacks with the noninterventionist approaches of the centralized government. In particular, they claim that the noninterventionist organization within Washington has destabilized personal relations, religious conviction, and ethics via activities such as the in-house revenue facility attack on Christian private educational institutions’ tax-exempt standing, sustenance for the lack of restrictions as well as accessibility of abortion, soft drug regulations, and resistance to prayer in public educational institutions. The last part of the New Christian Right philosophy is revolutionary anti-Marxism. Despite the fact that it was vital during the 1970’s and 1980’s, its importance had since decreased. On the other hand, independence stays to be a main premise (Crawford, & Olson, p. 111, 2001). With respect to Christian-American perspective, America is similar to a city upon a hill that is, exquisitely appointed for a particular use, and to be as a model for every other country. The risk of Marxism, which supports rather a separate set of fundamental beliefs as compared to conformist Christianity, confronted the communal, educational, pious, and pro-independence realization of Christians. Once again, the New Christian Right perceives blame for the spread of Marxism as with the noninterventionist concerns within government. The noninterventionists hinder the fight in opposition to Marxism by jamming better protection spending as well as via advancing foreign policies of conciliation, withdraw and adjustment instead of approach of disagreement. The development of the New Christian Right from a communal faction enthusiasm to a mobilization demands a hypothetical re-understanding that deals with the number of associations that are present: the existing movement cannot be appreciated without taking into consideration both hypothetical representations (Marty et al, p. 394, 1996). The original status politics in addition to reserve mobilization representations have restrictions. On the one side, reserve mobilization premise is barely determined in that its purest adaptation almost prevents the concern of the inspirational results of the communal as well as cultural framework. A number of the more unyielding reserve mobilization philosophers even retain that inspirational issues, that is, resourceful leadership creates the mass movement grievance or basis of status / lifestyle discontent, instead of responded to by a communal, sacred, or political faction. On the other side, status politics provide solution for the thin reach of this dispute by setting up relative constituents of study, for instance, political as well as cultural alteration - developments that take place outside of the field of control of “issue-entrepreneurs” (Fairclough, p. 72, 2001), that faction organizers may generate representational connotations that subconsciously control political concerns. On the other hand, contrasting the reserve mobilization point of view and the essential guiding argument of representational politics states that ‘issue management’ is actually a response, or more accurately the confiscation of profitable prospect. As a result, this study recommends that whereas a considerable constituent within the arrangement of the movement is appropriate; the organization as well as continuation of the movement’s organization is mainly a job of the movement management. Status politics rules the communal structural momentum for movement’s development, while reserve mobilization beliefs direct the philosophy of representational strategy of issues and themes, the deployment of material in addition to other funds, and the common conversation among the movement and communal and political society (Hunt, p. 193, 2003). New Christian Right is a movement that networks within a wider communal and cultural framework on different levels. Their association with the movement’s continuing and interim goals chooses these levels. The continuing objectives, such as public restructuring / alteration, of the movement consist of the central declaration of pre-existing rank along with discontented way of life. On the other hand, the interim goals, such as protection of a body of affiliates along with other funds, consist of the methods considered necessary for the reserve acquirement in addition to mobilization process essential to attain the continuing objectives (McGowan, p. 299, 2008). The New Christian Right is both a communal faction association as well as a traditional pluralist interest group. That is, the New Christian Right can be described as a set of people that tries to use stress on countrywide as well as state governing bodies with the intention of achieving parliamentary objectives (Marshall, p. 230, 2008). On the other hand, to put lobbying stress on government, the New Christian Right must ascertain, take advantage of as well as effectuate the following four most important components: (1) discontent for rank / standard of living discontent; (2) goals; (3) leadership; (4) appropriate guiding principal. CONCLUSION The Christian Right has gained significant demonstration within American public life. The New Right, implied by the Christian coalition, utilizes both political and parliamentary resources to bring together a shared appearance of its restless way of life. The reserve mobilization supposition has been a most important theoretical explanation of public and political actions both. Study of some political group is required to incorporate the contacts and parliamentary aptitudes that are necessary for political pressure group concentrate on achieving the goals of time, funds, and civic expertise. The anti-communalist, anti-Catholic, anti-public interests Right dealt with political initiatives, but its motivational force was informative rather than political. The New Christian Right differs radically from the earlier Right. The previous one was without the parliamentary, political, as well as ideological issues to make and support a wider political group. REFERENCES Alexander, J. 2008. Stories of a Recovering Fundamentalist: Understanding and Responding to Christian Absolutism. AuthorHouse. Beckwith, F. 2010. Politics for Christians. IVP Academic. Berlet, C. and Lyons, M. N. 2000. Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort. The Guilford Press. Blaker, K. 2003. The Fundamentals of Extremism: The Christian Right in America. New Boston Books. Boston, R. 1996. The Most Dangerous Man in America. Prometheus Books. Bruce, S. 1995. The Rise and Fall of the New Christian Right. OUP. Butler, J. 2006. Born Again: The Christian Right Globalized. Pluto Press. Cormartie, M. 1999. No Longer Exiles: The Religious New Right in American Politics. University Press of America. Crawford, S. E. S. and Olson, L. R. 2001. Christian Clergy in American Politics. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Culver, S. and Dorhauer, J. 2007. Steeplejacking: How the Christian Right is Hijacking Mainstream Religion. Ig Publishing. Fairclough, A. 2001. To Redeem the Soul of America: The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Martin Luther King, Jr. OUP. Gushee, D. P. 2008. The Future of Faith in American Politics. Baylor University Press. Goldberg, M. 2006. Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism. W.W. Norton & Co. Gribben, C. 2009. Writing the Rapture: Prophecy Fiction in Evangelical America. OUP. Hedges, C. 2007. American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. Free Press. Hunt, S. 2003. Alternative Religions: A Sociological Introduction. Ashgate Pub Ltd. Ishay, M. 2008. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era, With a New Preface. University of California Press. Lienesch, M. 1993. Redeeming America: Piety and Politics in the New Christian Right. University of North Carolina Press. Lyons, G. 2010. The Next Christians. Doubleday Religion. Markham, I. S. 1994. Plurality and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press. Marshall, D. 2007. The Truth behind the New Atheism. Harvest House Publishers. Marty, M. E. Appleby, R. S. Garvey, J. H. and Kuran, T. 1996. Fundamentalisms and the State: Remaking Polities, Economies, and Militance. University Of Chicago Press. McGowan, A. T. B. 2008. The Divine Authenticity of Scripture: Retrieving an Evangelical Heritage. IVP Academic. Meyers, R. 2006. Why the Christian Right Is Wrong: A Minister's Manifesto for Taking Back Your Faith, Your Flag, Your Future. Jossey-Bass. Neiwert, D. 2009. The Eliminationists: How Hate Talk Radicalized the American Right. Paradigm Publishers. Rozeli, M. J. and Hamilton, M. A. 2011. Fundamentalism, Politics, and the Law. Palgrave Macmillan. Rudin, R. J. 2005. The Baptizing of America: The Religious Right's Plans for the Rest of Us. Thunder's Mouth Press. Ryan, M. and Switzer, L. 2009. God in the Corridors of Power: Christian Conservatives, the Media, and Politics in America. Praeger. Schafer, A. R. 2011. Countercultural Conservatives: American Evangelicalism from the Postwar Revival to the New Christian Right. University of Wisconsin Press. Shields, J. A. 2009. The Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right. Princeton University Press. Stenger, V. J. 2009. The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason. Prometheus Books. Taylor, M. L. 2005. Religion, Politics, and the Christian Right. Fortress Press. Utter, G. H. and True, J. L. 2004. Conservative Christians and Political Participation: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. Waldman, S. 2008. Founding Faith: Providence, Politics, and the Birth of Religious Freedom in America. Random House. Weaver, M. J. and Appleby, R. S. 1995. Being Right: Conservative Catholics in America. Indiana University Press. Willis, C. and Hardcastle, N. 2005. Jesus Is Not a Republican: The Religious Right's War on America. Thunder's Mouth Press. Zwier, R. 1992. Born-again politics: the new Christian right in America. InterVarsity Press. Read More