Reign and Election of Obama since 2009 - Essay Example

Health Care Reform Since, in the year 1912, US Health Care has yearned for new implementations that would effectively cater for it population’s wellbeing. This was after Theodore Roosevelt suggested health insurance meant for industrial workers in his campaign to power. Since then to date, health care debate continued to top media’s headline news concerning unending disagreements among the state’s administrators. These encompassed democrats and republicans who besides opposing each other bear varied opinions in their midst regarding the already implemented alterations (Carpenter 23). The onset of Obama’s leadership and implementation of what he promised while campaigning, has not successfully tackled the issue, though, some strides currently are evident. This is because the system is still expensive and inaccessible to numerous populaces, hence having many people uninsured, besides intense funding from the government. “Obama Is Not the First” confirms unending journey with numerous suggestions from varied American leaders who had devoted intention of improving the system (Carpenter 23). Besides varied efforts by high-spirited leaders intending to improve health care, this has not adequately convinced American masses. This is because its Health Care is still the most expensive among the developed states besides having numerous natives uninsured for better treatment if they become sick. America has encountered competing proposals meant for reforms especially in 1990s and 1970s during the reign of Clinton and Nixon respectfully (Carpenter 23 & 24). Great oppositions mainly did not emanate from one side, but both from the democrats and republicans due to the state’s Health Care complexity. Since, besides catering for the natives’ welfare, it also intended to include the already economically challenged immigrants. Carpenter observes how America’s Health welfare is inadequate compared to other states in developed states, besides funding the system immensely. “The United States is the only Industrialized country without universal coverage. So the question is, why everywhere else and not here? Atul Cawande, a surgeon on the faculty at Harvard Medical School, published an excellent assessment of how universal coverage was accomplished in other countries1 (Carpenter 24).” Atul Cawande is unable to comprehend how other states have effectively stabilized their health care systems and improved their citizen’s welfare contrary to America, which is a powerful state globally. He expounds how some nations like United Kingdom and France have advanced their health premises, which were in use throughout WW11 to cater for their citizens. Furthermore, Atul Cawande describes how Switzerland until 1994 depended on private and commercial insurance prior enacting coverage Act to improve their systems (Carpenter 24). This entailed each native to acquire private insurance with public subsidies purposely to aid low-income earners. According to Carpenter, US besides long History of trying to equal their counterparts in Health Care, prior to Obama’s reign, continued to encounter difficulties that emanated from poor strategies. In addition, diverse political philosophies held by both republicans and democrats worsen the state, which costs the state colossal of money apart from other resources. However, reign and election of Obama since 2009 has almost reversed the America’s state of health care with inclusion and recognition of diverse people in the state. For illustration, the former marginalized societies, who could not enjoy the health benefits due to their origin or economically challenged. The new implementations according to the incumbent president’s strategies encompassed answerability and transparency in the health sector, which necessitated physicians and insurers, undertake their roles seriously. “Greater integration among various parts of the medical system, the reduction of redundancies, and a cultural shift that assigns value to the personal connection linking physicians and patients are necessary to construct a more humane and effective system (Searles 138).” Besides, physicians being accessible when the ailing make fifteen minutes visits, they must cultivate a partnership or health relationship with patients, which will assist in effective provision of health care services. This eliminates tension amid the patient and doctor, which earlier implied that the patient could not dare question the conduct of medication process. In addition, the culture of accountability sensitized physicians that they should act beyond their profession’s boundaries with the aim of saving humanity and not from what they will benefit from the patient. “It is incumbent of every physician to take the Good Samaritan approach, no matter what the circumstances are; compassion must overrule legalism (Searles 139).” This is especially to the immigrants that have got in America illegitimately and need medication attention when they are ill. Since, “medicine is not a right but a privilege subject to rules that include citizenship (Searles 139).” This implies that, regardless of state’s ideologies or keenness to observe the law, diseases emanating from foreign-born people will have grievous effects on the entire population if not tackled early. Health Reforms presently are also evident in other associations that cater for diverse human requirements mainly the elderly- hospice care. Since, not all people with the current commitments will be able to care for own elderly while still working. Some members may be terminally ill to the extent where one’s members cannot manage to tackle the situation adequately even with the necessary resources availed. Hence, the state “With respect to end-of-life care, the Affordable Care Act focuses significantly on coverage of one medical specialty—hospice care (Cerminara 444).” Similar to other ordinary health service requirements, hospice care exercises their roles within the stated Act directives about both selection and admission of patients in its organization. Despite the already initiated reforms in Hospice care, citizens complain how “Congress has given with one hand while taking with the other2 (Cerminara 444).” This is evident from the impending overregulation strategies by government in settling payments and accessing Hospice. Medicare treatment regulations, besides enabling deserving patients access the health’s benefits; still deny some people chance because during the selection process may not adequately fulfill the required criteria (Cerminara 446). Since one’s illegibility for Hospice Care, must effectively pass the three-step inquiry process criterion where in contrary the patient’s members result to bearing the burden, which they had hoped Medicare would cater effectively. Work Cited Carpenter, Caryl E. "We've Been Down This Road Before-- Health Reform In The United States." Journal Of Financial Service Professionals 63.4 (2009): 23-26. Web. 10 Apr. 2012 Cerminara, Kathy L. "Hospice And Health Care Reform: Improving Care At The End Of Life." Widener Law Review 17.2 (2011): 443-473. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. Searles, Christopher. "Beyond Health Care Reform: Immigrants And The Future Of Medicine." Ethnic & Racial Studies 35.1 (2012): 135-149. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. Read More