Organizational commitment depends significantly and substantively on the perception of the high corporate ethical values; therefore, commitment refers to the institutional outcome of the ethical decision-making. Several theories are used in explaining the existing relationship between the commitment of the institution and corporate ethical values. For instance, the social identity, organizational justice theory, person-organization fit, and cognitive dissonance theory applicable within the company’s corporate ethical value. According to the cognitive dissonance theory, the employees usually tend to exert considerable efforts in minimizing the level of dissonance within the environment that puts in an organizational context implying strive and the desire of congruence of the employees and their level of ethical standards and harmonization (Sekhar, 2002, 201). In case there is dissonance or incongruence perception, there would be dissatisfaction and the desire for congruence with the ethical standards and institution.
The Health and safety of the employees are important in ensuring the achievement of the desired outcomes and enhancing the morale of their performance. Through the years, PUMA has managed to keep consistency in its profile on occupational health and safety for all its employees. Moreover, the company provides essentials and necessities, which are consistent with the required standards of the countries it operates. However, some of the necessities provided do not keep up to the standards within the safety of the employees. PUMA aims to be Forever Faster and the fastest sports brand globally. In line with such an objective, the company has able to redefine its global sustainability strategy to strike a balance between the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability to achieve the desired sustainable business development (Puma, 2013). With the company’s lifecycle approach that commences from the design of the product, the company is setting strong sourcing sustainable raw materials and encouraging the suppliers to adopt the Industry Good Practice during its manufacturing process and the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemical.
A company’s corporate ethical value, PUMA, the vendors, and subcontractors provide the workers with safe and healthy workplaces and making the necessary efforts in avoiding the damage to the health of the employees. Moreover, the company has ensured that the employees support its Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Policy and ensuring that workers follow all the applicable laws and regulations regarding health and safety. For PUMA, a safe workplace is of higher priority. Since poor working conditions could result in personal tragedy and financial loss for the business. The company aims at ensuring zero accidents within its operations and the contracted supplier production facilities within the company’s supply chain. Within the company, health and safety are a shared responsibility, which makes it the duty of every worker to report immediately to the manager any health and safety issue within the workplace (Puma, 2013). Furthermore, PUMA encourages the workers to play an active role in the identification of the hazards and offering ideas of improving health and safety. The company recognizes that it requires permanent efforts in keeping a safe working environment; therefore, there is an adequate commitment to improving continuously its performance. It is the responsibility of the OHS committee to monitor the health and safety conditions.
With the rising level of competition, companies within the sports industry are focusing on unsustainable methods of attracting customers. However, PUMA emphasizes trust in building an effective relationship with the customers. PUMA contributes to fair competition and refrains from various behavioral activities, which are likely to contravene the applicability of the antitrust laws.
Although the antitrust laws and regulations might differ from a place in wording, the legal systems tend to share the common goal of ensuring that there is fair competition between the market players (Spencer, 2009, 101).
Read More