The issue of discrimination arises from this story. Would it be that she tripped them because she is Hungarian, and they are not? This is an issue that can be considered as having occurred between people from different countries, one of which is developed and enjoying good economic growth while the other is struggling with war. These migrants could be filling up Hungary and might probably enjoy benefits that other Hungarians ought to have. Moreover, they might take up the jobs of Hungarians soon.
However, regardless of these factors, she should have applied normative ethics and dealt with the situation as it was, coming up with the best moral decision for the scenario (Lindsay, 2012). Moreover, she should have used applied ethics concerning journalism. As a journalist, she was only supposed to film the event and leave the rest to police. Even though the journalist lost her job after the incident and gave an apology to the victims involved, it is difficult to determine whether she would act in the same way in another similar situation.
I do not condemn her but rather try to fit in her shoes. She probably acted in a manner suggesting that she was helping the police, and probably thought that she would be a hero at the end of the day. However, ethics overrides every other form of glory, and she should have upheld the best morals of a journalist. Arrested for Making Clock The social media was filled with stories of a 14-year-old from Irving’s MacArthur High School when he created an alarm clock for a class project. He probably thought that he had made a big achievement having used simple semiconductor devices, gears, a circuit board and a display screen.
However, he was shocked when he received negative attention from his school, who ended up calling the police claiming that he had created a bomb and brought it to school (Fernandez & Hauser, 2015, 52). As young as he was, Ahmed Mohamed was arrested, handcuffed and taken to the police to answer questions regarding his alleged acts of terrorism. The police were embarrassed when it was confirmed that the invention was just a clock and that the boy had no ill intentions. As soon the story aired on T.V., I recognized the Islamic identity of the boy, and it hit me that stereotyping still exists.
This form of discrimination focuses on generalizing the behavior of certain people by comparing it to a small group of people from the same race or ethnicity (Dancy, 2004). For young Ahmed, his Islamic nature made people believe that he was a terrorist, including his teachers. Even though he had created something innovative in the fulfillment of a class project, it was felt that he was a threat that needed to be eliminated immediately. According to the American Declaration of Human Rights, people are created differently, and everyone is born with rights that cannot be alienated from them (The Universal Declaration, 2011).
Such rights include those of life and the pursuit of happiness. Ahmed is passionate about technology and NASA and hopes to study at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He shows this passion by creating an alarm clock, a device that most of his classmates had probably only bought and never thought of building. Immanuel Kant, a philosopher, noted that everyone has a worth dignity that should be respected. I believe this theory was not upheld when it came to the arrest of Ahmed. The boy is just a youngster who was experimenting with devices and gadgets and ended up loving them.
His appearance should not derail anyone into thinking that they can discriminate against him by comparing him to terrorists. Beyond the rights approach, the story would have been different had the clock exploded in school. The lives of many young students and a few adults would have been at stake. Therefore, the teachers can be credited for listening to their conscience. It would be inappropriate for one to condemn fully their act since they were only acting out of suspicion and out of the love and care they had towards other children studying in the school.
Read More