Understanding My Locality: Urban Planning - Personal Statement Example

Understanding My Locality: Urban Planning Understanding My Locality: Urban Planning Studies have it that the recent pattern of residential development within 10 Kilometers in the postal code, compares with that of the country in that, many designs are set to help in a way to accommodate new dwellings and additional households, within the 10 kilometer radius without adding up some meters. The aim is not to come up with an approximation but help understand how housing becomes accommodated, which happen when one is familiar with the area and the set statistical indicators can be compared with each other, not forgetting accessibility to the household. The named figures one and two explain how distribution of households vary. An example of the area around Cambridge (CB18NT) has a rapid building rate, while that of Lewisham in south London, SE61DF, is growing too at a faster rate of 0.87% and reflects that it is approaching ten times greater when compared to Cambridge which has 0.98%. This clearly indicates that, if growth rates in terms of development were to be constant, across the country, all points would lie on the fitted regression line. The effects are thus evidenced by the vertical distance between any points plotted from the regression line. Most dwellings have been built in the upper sides and adjoin London and major provincial cities to show that it is in the urban area leaving an additional space of new buildings after having accommodated over 15,000. The lower side is assumed to be the rural area, because it is sparsely occupied is under in as much as it is under represented. The above statement evidence that, the more a part of the country is populated, the more it gives no room for expansion, but becomes popular business wise. It tends to capture the market in an alarming rate. If sparsely populated, there is less investment done in the region but leaves room for expansion in later days, because it tends to attract attention. And no day will a country remain constant in both ends. There must be an area that has proper investment in terms of buildings, business and market. From 1990, there has been an increasing interest in recycling Brownfield sites with an aim of changing house buildings into urban areas. The activity became rapid after a revision in the Planning Policy Guidance Note 3, in the year 2000, which not only targeted that at least 60% of the new built houses should occupy Brownfield, but also had an aim of trying to equalize the density. Brownfield in a broader sense had a thought that when the urban land recycling is combined with high development density, it would reflect that the high building rates of the city would have no room for urban expansion. This means that, the free land is kept safe, while the residents maximize the resources within their reach to their satisfaction. Viability for residential development seems to be high on the lower side; this area is highly captured since it is scarce when compared to the upper side. An example, where Cottingham (HU164AS), which lies on the lower side, is taken to be Europe’s largest residential development since 1990 and continues to be built. The Europeans focused on this region because if compared to the upper side, the houses in the lower region are cheap and affordable, and in turn, give room for rapid development. Also if new residential areas are established in the name of households, it gives room for construction of new dwellings. For a place to become a household, it not only depends on new constructions, but also demolition of other old constructions that give room for new structures. By this, it tries to balance the ratio between those destroyed versus what the population decides to put up. From figure three, it tries to point out the importance of estates where it confirms that estates account for a share of non-residential establishments. This evidences that, estates tend to accommodate non-residential. It also shows that urban development where estates are built is less dense but they mark an importance in the physical development. Different categorical names used for various employment estates do not represent different mixes of those who occupy them, but the names have a relation to the naming fashions. An example in the 1960s and 70s, industrial estates were established, and with time, other estates changed their names to capture the markets. The nature of retail offer in the locality, is represented by crude indicators of the market positioning, and depend upon applying some names of organizational classification. It comes up with some retail fascias that are subjective, in that, U, represent up market image, M –midmarket image and D-down market image. Scores also vary where down market fascias is 1, midmarket 2 and up market 3 and allow for construction of an average score. Retail offer tend to be higher in the units that are sparsely populated. This is evidenced by most scores been found on the lower side in the earlier discussed study that was dominated by Europe. The statistics keep on varying between high and low side. Basing on distance around the postal code, an area of about 500m, and most retail centers have been suggested beginning from very tiny to larger areas. This means, very small centers that lack representation in big retail chains have been picked or chosen. It depicts an example of non-residential establishments where they occupy the least proportions but are very significant. For down market to succeed, and improve the score, it should come up with a strategy to raise the volume of the sales it has. TR11 2DR (Falmouth, Cornwall), is one among the local planning authority that lies on the lower side of the vertical margin. It occupies the unpopulated area and may be given time like in the next ten years to attract the market since Europeans invaded the region to promote the development of the area. Once new development comes in, there is need to come up with new dwelling units and to do this under the rule of Brownfield, that focus on recycling while maximizing appropriate use of resources, it would be wise to demolish those structures that will have become old so as to give room for new structures and squeeze some space. This will happen because once a building is brought down; little space is left for a new settlement. Also, the location in the lower side of the vertical margin is not populated like in the other side and in turn, this will give space for coming up with new structures hence the establishment of additional dwelling units after coming up with a strategy. Retail offer also comes into play, the areas is scored the lowest because it is sparsely built in and this increase interest where, the LPA will tend to increase their rates by coming up with strategies to promote and invest in the area to make it marketable in a period of the next ten years. Basing on distance around the postal code, an area of about 500m, and most retail centers have been suggested beginning from very tiny to larger areas. This means, very small centers that lack representation in big retail chains have been picked or chosen. So, LPA will mark the area and pick on it. This tries to explain an example of non-residential establishments where they occupy the least proportions but are very significant. For down market to succeed, and improve the score, it should come up with a strategy to raise the volume of the sales it has. The idea will be appropriate because, it shows that small centers that lack representation in big retail chains and have no competition, ending up been picked or chosen. So LPA is also not left with other options but to work on it and rise up among others in competition. Just like Retail offer, which points out the areas that are least scored this is because they are sparsely built; LPA will work hand in hand to increase interest. LPA will have to increase their rates by coming up with strategies to promote and invest in the area to make it marketable in a period of the next ten years. Also, the idea that the location in the lower side of the vertical margin is not populated like in the other side, strategies for LPA will give room for effectiveness and in turn, this will give space for coming up with new structures hence the establishment of additional dwelling units after coming up with new strategies. The strategies are expected to be effective because the already established buildings are left to serve people before been termed old. Once new development comes in, like LPA, there is need to come up with new dwelling units. This may be done still with a focus in one of the policies of and rule of Brownfield that focuses on recycling with an aim of maximizing appropriate use of resources. By this it would only be considered wise to demolish those structures that will have become old so as to give room for new structures and squeeze some space. This will happen because once a building is brought down; little space is left for a new settlement. Residential development seems to be high on the lower side and promising to be viable; this area is highly captured because it is scarce when compared to the upper side. An example, where Cottingham (HU164AS), which lies on the lower side, is taken to be Europe’s largest residential development since 1990 and continues to be developed. The Europeans focused on this region because if compared to the upper side, the houses in the lower region are cheap, affordable, and in turn, give room for rapid development. The area will become economically viable because of its affordability, this means that the area is easy to own a piece of land and invest because prices cannot compare to the already developed area in the higher side of the vertical line. It also easily accessible to LPA, and so there will be no wastage of time moving from one place to another. Also low rate of competition will make the area compete with their opponent in the higher side. This will be consistent with goals of LPA and NPPF. LPA has goals of coming up with new structures and if new residential areas are to be established in the name of households, it should look for ways to construct new dwellings. Not only will new constructions be established for a place to become a household, but also demolition of other old constructions were built earlier should be considered so as to give room for new structures. By this, it tries to balance the ratio between those destroyed versus what the population decides to put up. Figure three that talks of the relationship between log of dwelling Stock and log of Percentage of Charity Shops; 10km Relationship in Hinterlands, tries to point out the importance of estates where it confirms that estates account for a share of non-residential establishments. This evidences that, estates tend to accommodate non-residential. It also shows that urban development where estates are built is less dense but they mark an importance in the physical development. The idea that estates are sparsely populated, paves way for LPA and National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to note that the location in the lower side of the vertical margin is not populated in as much as it lies in the urban area. On the other side, it will give space for coming up with new structures and enhance the establishment of additional dwelling units after coming up with a strategy. In conclusion, the paper on business strategy focuses on, understanding of one’s’ of the nature of their own residential development around the pace one comes from that is in their home town. In as much as they would love to appreciate the relevant local policies already established and the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Bibliography Table 2: Principal Occupiers of Employment Estate Property within 10km of Student Addresses Table 3 Employment Estates within 10km of Student Postcodes https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf. This workshop is not concerned directly with policy but with residential development outcomes in the period 2001-2011 Figure 3 England: Estate Establishments as a Percentage of Non-Residential Establishments, 2010 Figure 3: Relationship Between Log of Dwelling Stock and Log of Percentage of Charity Shops; 10km Hinterlands Figure 3: Relationship Between 2001 Dwelling Stock and Use of Brownfield Sites http://www.wmra.gov.uk/documents/Employment%20Land%20Background%20Paper%20Revised%20Version%20March09.pdf). Read More