Comparison between NGOs and GOs, that work to conserve or preserve biodiversity and the environment - Essay Example

Comparison between NGOs and GOs, that work to conserve or preserve biodiversity and the environment Affiliation Date Comparison between NGOs and GOs, that works to conserve or preserve biodiversity and the environment Conservation of the environment has been the top one priority in many organizations that have taken upon the mandate of ensuring that the environment is conducive for both living and non-living things. Generally, three types of organizations are involved in ensuring environmental safety, and they include governmental organizations that have the authority to prosecute violations of environmental regulations that are committed within their jurisdictions.

The intergovernmental organizations, which is part of the multinational organization such as the United Nations that are responsible for regulating and legislating conservation efforts within signatory countries. A good example of such an organization is the United Nations Environmental Programme. Lastly, there is the Non-governmental organizations that work independently from the government to protect the endangered and threatened areas and species such as the Greenspace and WWF. This essay will focus on the Intergovernmental and non-governmental organization where they will compared and contrasted to understand their role and activities in the restoration and preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems.

United Nations Environment Programme is one of the agencies in the United Nations that organizes its environmental activities helping developing countries in implementing sound and practical environmental policies and practices (Gunter, 2004). World Wide Fund for Nature, on the other hand, is a non-governmental organization that works globally on issues relating to the research, conservation and restoration of the environment. Additionally, the Greenpeace is another nongovernmental organization, which ensures that the earth has the ability to nature lifecycle in all its multiplicity.

Moreover, it focusses on campaigning on international issues such as deforestation, climate change, commercial whaling, anti-nuclear issues and genetic engineering. Therefore, although the organizations are managed by different organizations they all works towards the same goal and that is conserving the environment. Additionally, the both non-governmental and intergovernmental organizations helping in creating awareness over global issues that affect the environment and the species that live in it.

However, although conveying several similarities there are various differences that include the methods on which the goals of each organizations are reached (Swiderska & International Institute for Environment and Development, 2008). For example, Greenpeace uses research, lobbying, and direct action, which have been to be effective in ensuring that they are heard and their goals are achieved. UNEP on the other hand, helps their signatories bring into law Acts of parliament that will help in conserving the environment.

Secondly, the two organizations are different in the sense that, the management of the organization depends on whether it governmental, intergovernmental or non-governmental (Markussen, M., & SpringerLink, 2005). WWF stands for World Wide Fund for Nature, which is a Universal non-governmental organization. The reason WWF uses a Giant panda, as a logo is solely that at the time the organization was beginning it was the only panda in western world meaning that there was an endangered species that needed to be protected (Guinness & Walpole, 2012).

Additionally, there was a need for an animal that would influence black and white printing. The main biodiversity campaigns in Greenpeace are defending the oceans, protecting the forests and promoting sustainable agriculture. Greenpeace practice direct action ensuring that people all over the world get to hear what they intend to put across. An action they have taken that has gotten the attention of the people is the “Go beyond Oil” a campaign that is concentrated on slowing and ending the universal depletion of oil eventually.

ReferencesGuinness, P., & Walpole, B. (2012). Environmental systems and societies for the IB Diploma.Gunter, M. M. (2004). Building the next ark. Hanover (N.H.: University Press of New England.Markussen, M., & SpringerLink (Online service). (2005). Valuation and conservation of biodiversity: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the convention on biological diversity. Berlin: Springer.Swiderska, K., & International Institute for Environment and Development. (2008). The governance of nature and the nature of governance: Policy that works for biodiversity and livelihoods.

London: International Institute for Environment and Development.