Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410704-establish-the-topic-from-the-paper
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1410704-establish-the-topic-from-the-paper.
There have been numerous comparisons made of the Federalist Papers to Locke’s theories and also interpretational differences with the Publius political theory by religious groups such as the Muslims. According to Locke’s initiative, an ideal government has as its foundation the natural rights, dignity, and of course unlimited ownership. Self-interest is a dominant trait of political liberalism as people naturally must respect their individual rights while safeguarding the rights of others.
The society as a whole must operate according to its needs and not answer to a system modeled on the divine right of kings and queens. Societies, and therefore, governments are best when they become a natural unfolding of the principle of together we stand, divided we fall. Locke deems that a person can give up their right to live by dedication to a cause such as war but property itself cannot be so easily sacrificed since mortality is abstract and property is tangible and acquired as the right of each individual.
In short, a governing body can take lives for defense of a system but possessions, such as land, is not under their realm of jurisdiction. The immutable standard of right is contained in a natural state of morality. Morality, in the state of nature, according to Locke, displays no subordination to a ruling dynamic but relies on a natural state of human customs, habits, and most notably, a universal law entombed within the natural human faculty of reasoning. Locke attributes this instinctual inclination of people as a logical avenue of expansion of life in sync with nature.
A community consists of a conscientiously guided network, not by rules of compulsion or tyranny, but through the inherent dignity of entitlement scorning superiority. The ultimate standard of a natural state of morality recognizes the sanctity of life through the collective judgment of good or bad behavior or conduct in consideration of all humans.. Society, when striped of all adornments, is fundamentally a contract that unites humanity in order to protect their investments, with property ownership being the paramount source of concern.
As a community, humankind begins to accumulate more land and more possessions, thereby creating a bona fide and dire need for the protection of these very things. Without a law that is capable of fairly regulating the action of all, society is left open to the corrupted ascendancy of the violation of natural rights. Locke’s society provides the rights, laws, and codes of behavior acceptable to curtail any tresspassing on the people’s perogative to sidestep violence and war. Locke’s ideology of equality adventageouly contributes to society but omits to consider those that are not landowners.
Such unfortunates are protected by the rules of the government but their privledges and voice in such matters is diminished. The stability of a society is the strongest indication of a successful centralized authority that protects the rights and privileges of landowners from arbitrary seizure of possessions. The creation of a division of authority strengthens the checks and balances system on government power over the people. The proper role of people in this manmade law of just, peaceful and protected existence depends on the basic need of interaction and general agreement between each other.
The appropriate conduct of people in a society is to take the responsibilities and the duties along with the benefits
...Download file to see next pages Read More