Download file to see previous pages...
Furthermore if it comes to a choice between regulated studies on a few animals and treatment for an incurable disease, most people reluctantly make the same choice (Morelle).On the other hand, and animal rights activists argue that animal testing and experimentation is ethically and morally wrong, because by experimenting carious medicines on animals, we are selfishly causing them pain for our own benefit. While the standpoint of the activists may be sympathetic, ultimately, in Western society as a whole accepts the sacrifice of animals in the name of science. Joan Ryan, an ex-home office minister quoted, “Animal research and testing has played a part in almost every medical breakthrough of the last century. It has saved hundreds of millions of lives worldwide”. (Ryan).
In fact, animal testing may not be the only way to discover new methods of treatment and diagnosis. The tests performed provide convenience as most of the test animals resemble the Human biological system and the results observed in these systems are quite similar to the effects expected to be observed in Humans. Since Humans can’t be used for testing and experimental purposes. Moreover, as animals share similar biological features to humans; animal testing has made strides in veterinary medicine as well.
On the other hand, there are many people who consider animal testing as cruelty being inflicted upon the animals, the issue of selfishness is also another reason that these experiments are considered wrong because of the fact that we hurt the animals just to gain benefit for our own self. Animal testing and experiments are also considered to violate animal rights; those who support this statement tend to believe that if testing on humans is considered wrong then the same should be considered for the animals (Shukla). All of these procedures and experiments are previously approved by the relevant
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
forms his or her own identity.2 Critical race theories which recognizes the categorization of white and black and homosexuals and heterosexuals assumes that racial minorities and non-heterosexuals are marginalized in sports.3 This research study argues however, the critical race theory and intersectional theory offer limited insight into both the opportunities for acceptance and rejection of minorities in sport.
Future historians exploring the political, social, and legal developments in the United States will likely recognize the debate over the legal and social acceptance of same-sex marriage as one of the most crucial issues of national policy of the new millennium.
There is lots of proof to this fact that people can sometime seek out something because it frightens. Questions have always been asked on the reason why people get scared by something that they know does not exist. An example is a group of people watching a horror movie and they get scared yet they know that what is taking place is just fiction and nothing serious.
There are many authors and general people who feel that this form of prohibition is unfair and homosexual people including both gays and lesbians must be allowed to become members of the US military. It is unfair to practice discrimination on the basis of the sexual preferences of individuals and deny homosexuals the rights of serving in certain forms of essential services.
This means that even couples that are of the same gender; gays and lesbians, should be able to enjoy these benefits even outside their heterosexual unions .while most people define marriage as an institution that is characterized by a union between man and woman, with an aim of childrearing and child bearing.
It has diverse aims ranging from inquiry, persuasion, negotiation and conviction. Each and every one of the aims aforementioned has different writing techniques. This paper, however, delves into one of them, writing to persuade. Persuasion begins from a point of differences between the parties but culminates at a point of agreement.
Dantzker (2005) states that according to Black’s Law Dictionary police discretion can be defined as “the power to act in an official capacity in a manner which appears to be just and proper under the circumstances”. Discretion denotes the
ildren, having a vulnerable and yet susceptible perceptions, most likely be influenced by what has been being exposed to them or what they were able to perceive visually, like watching television. In this manner, it can be assumed that television, as a medium, could be use to
is includes individuals with terminal illnesses, those who have little or no insurance or money to pay for the services and individuals belonging in specialized groups like the prisoners, soldiers among others (Shi and Singh 2011).
When there was the terrorist attack in the US,
The author explains that the scientific investigations that have been done on this issue are many and varied. In the following two articles, two different views have been presented with regard to the way these concussions sustained during play can lead to the players having long term negative impacts.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Arguing a postion for FREE!