The manner in which different institutions punish students for making mistakes or breaking the rules is a documented process that requires ethical clearance and understanding between the rule breaker and the authority responsible for punishing it. In this case, Zero Tolerance…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Zero tolerance policies are not effective as they cause more harm than good to an institution and the student offender at hand.
Despite the conflicting arguments on the zero tolerance policies, it has been widely used as a means of controlling school disruption and chaotic instances. Punishments given to all offences are severe disregard of the intensity of the incidents. The zero tolerance policies has its limitations in that it fails to address the underlying causes of the incidence therefore making it ineffective in countering crimes effectively. Recently, most schools in the America and Europe have embraced this policies which has led to most students being suspended or even expelled from their respective schools. A number of concerns and questions have aroused due to a research on this policies. Among the questions include, “Do zero tolerance policies in schools reduce incidents of bad behavior? and What are the societal consequences of suspension and expulsion of students who violate these policies? Juárez, pp. 415-416)”. Little evidence is available to credit school safety and improve behavior in students subjected to this policies.
Research on the effectiveness of expulsions and suspensions as an educational intervention, and other ethical concerns has generated data that shows the negative effects of the zero tolerance policies. This data has led to a change in punishments adopted in different schools which matches the offences committed and preventive measures of bullying and improvement in class management. Research done on finding of alternative ways of punishment will help schools in developing more effective and intrusive methods of school discipline.
In September 17, 1999, a fight broke between students of rival gangs in a football game at Decatur High School in Decatur. In October 1, 1999 the School Board expelled the seven students, all black from the school for two years. This move provoked reaction
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Others feel threatened by an overwhelming threat of violence in their institutions. Certain schools use zero tolerance because it is supported by the authorities. A literature review on the policy is imperative in determining whether these justifications are well-founded.
This article is about zero tolerance policies in the work place. Zero tolerance policies refer to strategies that allow for meager compromise on consequences of certain work place mistakes (Punch, 2007). This may relate to scenarios such as violence, harassment, internet and intranet policies.
The author states that Zero tolerance policy eliminating students who involve themselves in deviant behaviors will prohibit others from becoming disruptive. This will eventually create an improved and peaceful learning environment for the remaining students. These policies are widely spread among the schools in America.
Even schools are finding ways to ensure the safety of their students by maintaining a safe learning environment. The fact that in a school reigned by chaos, disruption and fear, teachers cannot teach effectively and children cannot learn successfully is a primary concern.
emotional and psychological. In this study we are trying to find out the extent of the problem and to see if the policy of zero tolerance will be effective in reducing bullying incidents that are taking place. The data has been gathered from a multi-cultural society to ensure that the results are not biased and represent the whole society not just a sub-sector.
There is also the harsh reality of about three percent of educators and students in urban schools, and one to two percent in their rural counterparts, are either robbed or physically attacked monthly. In fact, according to studies, at least 17,000 students suffer from serious physical injuries requiring medical attention.
To achieve this, the department of Zero Tolerance Policing should be made independent so that it may be free from any external interference by "the invisible hand". In the United Kingdom, this policy has been widened to even cover the internet misuse and sexual harassment that were initially not covered.
Cases of knife stabbing, mass shootouts, as well as, physical bullying continue to be significantly challenging issues, especially in public schools. It is irrefutable that, even a single case of student noncompliance poses a significant
This principle, in effect, reverses the burden of proof. The presumption of innocence is replaced by a presumption of guilt.
In contrast, Innes (2003) argues that reassurance or neighbourhood policing should be a key component of a 'total policing' philosophy which recognizes that neighbourhood safety is both objective (local crime rates are falling) and subjective
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Zero tolerance policies"
with a personal 20% discount.