Download file to see previous pages...
That is a question that haunts us all at some point in our lives. “Weve all got both light and dark inside us. What matters is the part we choose to act on. Thats who we really are.” (Rowling, n.d.) Those who choose the light are expected to fight for it at all times. However, is being a hero an obligation? It is really a choice. In essence, evil, obligation and heroism are separable in various circumstances and this explains the belief that no one has the obligation to fight evil whereas he/she puts the lives of the loved one in danger. This essay seeks to dissect various aspects relative to evil, obligation and intellectuality.
The word evil is associated with all sorts of bad things which may endanger the lives of people in a society. The question as to whether some people who have the ability to fight evil can do so even if the lives of their loved ones is in danger is debatable. Whereas I agree that, those with ability in political, religious or economic arenas to fight evil for the sake of the numerous lives of the other members of the society other philosophers such as Rousseau (1999), argues that there should be values attributed to any kind of heroism. Rousseau (1999) asserts that heroism requires recognition of values and a cognitive decision to undertake the top most risk in the fight for the attainment or defense of such values. This explains that despite that fact that heroism can be attributed to an element of choice, the fundamentals includes cognizance of the values and the greatness of the danger. This belief can be counter argued that heroism can be justified not only by choice by necessity. For instance, if only one option to save a life exists then this is attributed to personal sacrifice. In cases where personal sacrifice is foremost and the only way, then there is no aspect of choice in this situation. This explanation disqualifies the belief that heroism is by choice, because there is a possibility of making a choice not to save
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The word ‘hero’ is derived from Greek language which means a mortal that has done something which a normal human can’t do and are considered and regarded as divine figures (LaBarge 2010). According to Jennifer Warner (2004), “the Greek term for hero literally meant someone who was semi-divine and born from one mortal and one divine parent, and eventually Greek society went on to view sporting champions as "born of the Gods.” Without heroes, society can’t achieve progress or greatness, because society wouldn’t have examples of “achieving greatness” or a way to “define our ideals like courage, honor and justice which largely define us” or in other words, who we are in soc
Accidental Heroes Whether heroes are born or made is a hotly debated issue. My position is that heroes are made by the decisions they have had to make under tough circumstances. In some cases, heroes even come out of breaking the established norms and rules in their respective worlds.
governments tend to fail a) USSR and communism 10) Conclusion Abstract: This paper attempts to answer to questions: whether or not every individual must be responsible for fighting evil, even when it puts their lives or their loved ones in danger, and whether intellectuals might be better leaders than other people because of their ability to understand right and wrong.
While the heroes “though subjected into concealing the crime at first” they strive to overcome their oppressors and prove their morality.The heroes in the films viewed in the class have double identities which they try unmask therefore highlighting their heroism as they grapple with concealing the negative identities.
Some think that the word hero or the title for heroes has been overused by people while others seem to think that America as a nation has failed to recognise most of its heroes. This topic has been critically addressed by authors such as Nicholus (pp. 347-348) and Klinkenborg (Para 1) who look at the issue of heroism in America in different lights.
The conventional meaning of the term hero as implied by the way it has been represented in media over the last century is that of a person with massive powers, typically physical, that he uses to accomplish noble tasks for the betterment of the mankind. While the concept of a hero is fairly old, no society in the history of the world has probably seen as many heroes and that too in such a short span of time as America has since the 9/11 attacks.
Or if it is female, that someone happens to be beautiful and kind.
The characteristics of a hero, however goes beyond the jurisdiction of strength, beauty, or goodness. It also lies in inner qualities like wisdom, extraordinary simplicity, fortitude in the face of adversity, and even genuine concern and caring nature which some people happen to practice in their daily lives without being noticed.
the most obvious reason for the gratuitous creation of heroes where none would otherwise exist has a host of politically expedient, as well reasons directly related to social cohesion and role model creation. As such, this brief essay will seek to analyze this unique trend
Martin Luther is arguably one of the U.S hero but his heroism permeated across the world. It is not uncommon for leaders to quote his wise words in speeches. Nelson Mandela is also recognized as a hero in South Africa as well as the rest of the
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Heroes and Intellectuals for FREE!